510(k) · Cleared
Recalled · 2008Permanent Pacing Lead, Model PY2
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Oscor, Inc. · DTB Permanent Pacemaker Electrode
Cleared on Aug 6, 2004 after a 31-day review. FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate. It has been recalled once.
- Decided
- Aug 6, 2004
- Review
- 31 days
- Class
- Class III
- Product code
- DTB
- Recalls
- 1
- Predicates
- 0
FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA 510(k) statement (indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in DTB? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
- Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
- Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
What was it cleared against?
FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
Recalls of this device
| Date | Class | Recall | Root cause | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2008 | Not classified | Z-2333-2008 | Nonconforming Material/Component | The O-rings are over tolerance making it hard to connect the leads to the pacemaker. |
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
How does its category compare?
All DTB devicesDTB Permanent Pacemaker Electrode: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · DTB
1in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · DTB
Too few DTB 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.
Recalls per year · DTB
1in 2015
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · DTB
25,591in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code DTB, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 0 | — | 0 | 5,401 |
| 2008 | 0 | — | 1 | 6,469 |
| 2009 | 0 | — | 2 | 7,565 |
| 2010 | 0 | — | 2 | 14,285 |
| 2011 | 0 | — | 0 | 12,555 |
| 2012 | 0 | — | 0 | 12,230 |
| 2013 | 0 | — | 0 | 10,102 |
| 2014 | 0 | — | 0 | 13,324 |
| 2015 | 3 | — | 1 | 11,071 |
| 2016 | 8 | — | 0 | 11,839 |
| 2017 | 5 | — | 0 | 11,495 |
| 2018 | 6 | — | 0 | 15,209 |
| 2019 | 7 | — | 0 | 16,812 |
| 2020 | 6 | — | 0 | 17,859 |
| 2021 | 3 | — | 0 | 18,442 |
| 2022 | 4 | — | 0 | 19,444 |
| 2023 | 7 | — | 0 | 34,542 |
| 2024 | 3 | — | 0 | 25,689 |
| 2025 | 1 | — | 0 | 25,591 |
| 2026 | 2 | — | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
Permanent pacing lead, Model PY2, is indicated for pacing and sensing of the ventricle and/or atrium of the heart. This lead is used in conjunction with a compatible, market cleared, implantable pulse generator (pacemaker).
Indications for use as stated in the FDA 510(k) statement.
https://510kreport.com/device/K041809 · printed Nov 4, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K041809: Permanent Pacing Lead, Model PY2.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K041809
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026