510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Nexflex Total Hip System

K042252510(k) SpecialCleared Dec 6, 2004108-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3358

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Alphatec/Nexmed · LPH Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented

Cleared on Dec 6, 2004 as substantially equivalent to K033580 (Nexmed, Inc., 2004) and 2 other predicates after a 108-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1999.

Decided
Dec 6, 2004
Review
108 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LPH
Recalls
None
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K990369 (1999). 3 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 2004: 1 other ancestor2000: 1 other ancestorK990369 · Synergy Cemented Hip Stem · Smith & Nephew, Inc. · 1999199619982000200220042006
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 2 other ancestors K990369 · Synergy Cemented Hip Stem · Smith & Nephew, Inc. · 19990
  1. Root · 1 generation backK990369 Synergy Cemented Hip StemSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 1999
  2. This deviceK042252 Nexflex Total Hip SystemAlphatec/Nexmed · 2004
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K990369Synergy Cemented Hip StemSmith & Nephew, Inc.1999—
0 (this device)K042252Nexflex Total Hip SystemAlphatec/Nexmed2004—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200010
200410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K042252, 1999–2004Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LPH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LPH device

  1. #1 K233498 Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Systems Labeling Updatescore 24.3 · 20 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K033580Nexflex Total Hip System
Summary page 2
…vices: Trade/Proprietary Name Manufacturer Clearance NexFlexTM Total Hip System Nexmed, Inc. K033580 Synergy HA Coated Porous Smith & Nephew, Inc. K002996 Femoral Stems Synergy Cemented…
Nexmed, Inc.2004—
*K002996Synergy HA Coated Porous Femoral Stems
Summary page 2
…Clearance NexFlexTM Total Hip System Nexmed, Inc. K033580 Synergy HA Coated Porous Smith & Nephew, Inc. K002996 Femoral Stems Synergy Cemented Hip Stems Smith & Nephew, Inc K990369 VIII Performance Dat…
Smith & Nephew, Inc.2000—
*K990369Synergy Cemented Hip Stem
Summary page 2
…rgy HA Coated Porous Smith & Nephew, Inc. K002996 Femoral Stems Synergy Cemented Hip Stems Smith & Nephew, Inc K990369 VIII Performance Data: Mechanical and dynamic testing of the SIERRA TM Femoral Hip Stem was performed.…
Smith & Nephew, Inc.1999—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • None of the 3 ancestors has a recall.

How does its category compare?

All LPH devices

LPH Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LPH

12in 2025

2007: 102008: 102009: 32010: 152011: 162012: 252013: 112014: 202015: 182016: 102017: 122018: 92019: 222020: 72021: 82022: 142023: 102024: 62025: 122026 (partial year): 8
2007high 25 (2012) · low 3 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LPH

153in 2025

2007: 116 days median2008: 86 days median2009: 112 days median2010: 100 days median2011: 110 days median2012: 76 days median2013: 135 days median2014: 129 days median2015: 111 days median2016: 150 days median2017: 121 days median2018: 145 days median2019: 164 days median2020: 164 days median2021: 410 days median2022: 247 days median2023: 111 days median2024: 92 days median2025: 153 days median2026 (partial year): 256 days median
2007high 410 (2021) · low 76 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LPH

4in 2025

2007: 162008: 12009: 22010: 222011: 262012: 302013: 92014: 32015: 12016: 82017: 142018: 22019: 82020: 62021: 42022: 22023: 22024: 12025: 42026 (partial year): 2
2007high 30 (2012) · low 1 (2008)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LPH

6,163in 2025

2007: 5092008: 7062009: 1,1562010: 2,0072011: 3,3202012: 3,7852013: 5,0022014: 5,1632015: 5,8302016: 4,9002017: 5,3122018: 5,9542019: 7,1302020: 5,4292021: 5,9782022: 5,2232023: 5,3452024: 5,6262025: 6,163
2007high 7,130 (2019) · low 509 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LPH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071011616509
200810861706
2009311221,156
201015100222,007
201116110263,320
20122576303,785
20131113595,002
20142012935,163
20151811115,830
20161015084,900
201712121145,312
2018914525,954
20192216487,130
2020716465,429
2021841045,978
20221424725,223
20231011125,345
202469215,626
20251215346,163
202682562—

What is it indicated for?

1) When used as a hemi-hip replacement system, it is intended for osteo-, rheumatoid, and post-traumatic arthritis of the hip with minimal involvement of the corresponding acetabulum, femoral head or neck fractures, aseptic necrosis of the femoral head, previous failed hip arthroplasty where there is evidence of sufficient bone quality to adequately set the implant. 2) When used as a total hip replacement system, it is intended for osteo-, rheumatoid…

Read the full statement (174 words)

1) When used as a hemi-hip replacement system, it is intended for osteo-, rheumatoid, and post-traumatic arthritis of the hip with minimal involvement of the corresponding acetabulum, femoral head or neck fractures, aseptic necrosis of the femoral head, previous failed hip arthroplasty where there is evidence of sufficient bone quality to adequately set the implant.

2) When used as a total hip replacement system, it is intended for osteo-, rheumatoid, and post-traumatic arthritis of the hip with minimal involvement of the corresponding acetabulum, femoral head or neck fractures, aseptic necrosis of the femoral head, previous failed hip arthroplasty where there is evidence of sufficient bone quality to adequately set the implant.

3) In addition, the NexFlex MT Total Hip System is intended for cases where alternative modes of treatment appear less preferable and the associated risks of a total hip replacement are thought to be acceptable. It is intended for severely disabled joints, which could result from arthritis or late stages of avascular necrosis and revisions of unsuccessful acetabular cup arthroplasty and/or femoral procedure.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K042252: Nexflex Total Hip System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K042252

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026