510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Tetric Evoceram

K042819510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 9, 200428-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.3690

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Ivoclar Vivadent, Inc. · EBF Material, Tooth Shade, Resin

Cleared on Nov 9, 2004 after a 28-day review. FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate. 72 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Nov 9, 2004
Review
28 days
Class
Class II
Product code
EBF
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

72 later devices descend from it, 14 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2006: 1 descendant cleared2019: 4 descendants cleared2022: 5 descendants cleared2009: 2 descendants cleared2014: 4 descendants cleared2007: 4 descendants cleared2020: 5 descendants cleared2013: 3 descendants cleared2016: 4 descendants cleared2024: 10 descendants cleared2012: 1 descendant cleared2008: 1 descendant cleared2017: 4 descendants cleared2018: 4 descendants cleared2026: 7 descendants cleared2010: 1 descendant cleared2025: 6 descendants cleared2021: 3 descendants cleared2023: 3 descendants cleared200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK042819 Tetric EvoceramIvoclar Vivadent, Inc. · 2004
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 43 of its ownK091388 GCUC-505GC America, Inc. · 2009
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 39 of its ownK123631 MFP-051GC America, Inc. · 2013
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 32 of its ownK133824 CerasmartGC America, Inc. · 2014
  5. Descendant · 3 generations on · 26 of its ownK160425 CAD/CAMouflage Milling BockPrismatik Dentalcraft, Inc. · 2016
  6. Descendant · 4 generations on · 25 of its ownK162537 CAD/CAMouflage Milling BlockPrismatik Dentalcraft, Inc. · 2016

Showing 5 of 72 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2006: 12007: 42008: 12009: 22010: 12012: 12013: 32014: 42016: 42017: 42018: 42019: 42020: 52021: 32022: 52023: 32024: 102025: 62026: 7
2006high 10 (2024) · low 0 (2011)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 72 · See all
  • K091388GCUC-505GC America, Inc. · 2009 · cites it directly43descendants
  • K123631MFP-051GC America, Inc. · 2013 · cites it directly39descendants
  • K133824CerasmartGC America, Inc. · 2014 · 2 generations on32descendants
  • K160425CAD/CAMouflage Milling BockPrismatik Dentalcraft, Inc. · 2016 · 3 generations on26descendants
  • K162537CAD/CAMouflage Milling BlockPrismatik Dentalcraft, Inc. · 2016 · 4 generations on25descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K042819Tetric EvoceramIvoclar Vivadent, Inc.2004—
+1K091388GCUC-505GC America, Inc.2009—
+1K123631MFP-051GC America, Inc.2013—
+2K133824CerasmartGC America, Inc.2014—
+3K160425CAD/CAMouflage Milling BockPrismatik Dentalcraft, Inc.2016—
+4K162537CAD/CAMouflage Milling BlockPrismatik Dentalcraft, Inc.2016—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200610
200740
200810
200920
201010
201210
201330
201440
201640
201740
201840
201940
202050
202130
202250
202330
2024100
202560
202670
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K042819, 2004–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA 510(k) statement (indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in EBF? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new EBF device

  1. #1 K202846 Tera Harzscore 18.5 · 7 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.

What descends from it? (72)

See all 72

14 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K091388GCUC-505GC America, Inc.200943
K123631MFP-051GC America, Inc.201339
K061860Clearfil Majesty EstheticKuraray Medical, Inc.200611
K070583Nano CompositeCosmedent, Inc.20073
K201707Opallis, Opallis FlowDentscare Ltda20202
K182921Infinix Universal CompositeNobio, Ltd.20192
K2216953M Filtek Supreme Flowable Restorative3M Company Espe Dental Products20221
K240112Light Cure CompositeSincera Technology (Changchun) Co., Ltd.20240
K192178R&D Series Nova Compo NImicryl Dis Malzemeleri Sanayi VE Ticaret AS20190
K182780XP CompositeS&C Polymer Silicon- Und Composite Spezialitaeten GmbH20190

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K091388 (GC America, Inc., 2009) has gone furthest, with 43 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All EBF devices

EBF Material, Tooth Shade, Resin: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · EBF

15in 2025

2007: 192008: 142009: 202010: 192011: 192012: 112013: 132014: 102015: 172016: 202017: 152018: 152019: 172020: 152021: 132022: 172023: 92024: 182025: 152026 (partial year): 16
2007high 20 (2009) · low 9 (2023)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · EBF

43in 2025

2007: 49 days median2008: 79 days median2009: 84 days median2010: 75 days median2011: 81 days median2012: 86 days median2013: 153 days median2014: 112 days median2015: 123 days median2016: 205 days median2017: 108 days median2018: 115 days median2019: 159 days median2020: 190 days median2021: 178 days median2022: 63 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 120 days median2025: 43 days median2026 (partial year): 59 days median
2007high 205 (2016) · low 43 (2025)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · EBF

1in 2020

2007: 12008: 422009: 12010: 62011: 72017: 42019: 22020: 12026 (partial year): 2
2007high 42 (2008) · low 0 (2012)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · EBF

1in 2025

2007: 62008: 102009: 82010: 312011: 312012: 622013: 2462014: 1952015: 1192016: 1432017: 422018: 82019: 112020: 22021: 22022: 22023: 82024: 52025: 1
2007high 246 (2013) · low 1 (2025)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code EBF, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007194916
200814794210
2009208418
20101975631
20111981731
20121186062
2013131530246
2014101120195
2015171230119
2016202050143
201715108442
20181511508
201917159211
20201519012
20211317802
2022176302
202398708
20241812005
2025154301
202616592—

What is it indicated for?

Anterior restorations (Class III, IV)

Class V restorations (cervical caries, root erosion, wedge-shaped defects)

Restorations in the posterior region (Class I and II)

Veneering of discolored anterior teeth

Splinting of mobile teeth

Repair of composite and ceramic veneers

Indications for use as stated in the FDA 510(k) statement.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K042819: Tetric Evoceram.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K042819

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026