510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · 2005

Haemonetics Cardiovascular Perioperative Autotransfusion System

K043127510(k) TraditionalCleared Jan 4, 200553-day reviewClass II21 CFR 868.5830Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Haemonetics Corp. · CAC Apparatus, Autotransfusion

Cleared on Jan 4, 2005 after a 53-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 1 later device descends from it. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Jan 4, 2005
Review
53 days
Class
Class II
Product code
CAC
Recalls
1
Predicates
0

1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2005: 1 descendant cleared20052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK043127 Haemonetics Cardiovascular Perioperative Autotransfusion SystemHaemonetics Corp. · 2005
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK053000 Haemonetics Cardiovascular Perioperative Autotransfusion System…Haemonetics Corp. · 2005 · Recalled

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K053000Haemonetics Cardiovascular Perioperative Autotransfusion System (Cardiopat)Haemonetics Corp. · 2005 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K043127Haemonetics Cardiovascular Perioperative Autotransfusion SystemHaemonetics Corp.2005—
+1K053000Haemonetics Cardiovascular Perioperative Autotransfusion System (Cardiopat)Haemonetics Corp.20053

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K043127, 2005–2005Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in CAC? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new CAC device

  1. #1 K240426 Aventus Clot Management Systemscore 11.2 · 4 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—Haemonetics® Orthopedic Perioperative Autotransfusion System (OrthoPAT®)
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K053000Haemonetics Cardiovascular Perioperative Autotransfusion System (Cardiopat)Haemonetics Corp.20050

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Jul 22, 2005Not classifiedZ-0174-06OtherBlood clotting of patient post operative while on the cardioPAT Cardiovascular Perioperative Autotransfusion System

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K053000 (Haemonetics Corp., 2005) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All CAC devices

CAC Apparatus, Autotransfusion: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · CAC

3in 2024

2008: 12010: 42011: 22012: 32013: 12014: 32016: 22017: 12018: 22019: 12020: 12021: 42022: 12023: 22024: 3
2007high 4 (2010) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · CAC

91in 2024

2010: 123 days median2012: 90 days median2014: 269 days median2021: 155 days median2024: 91 days median
2007high 269 (2014) · low 90 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · CAC

7in 2023

2007: 12008: 52009: 252010: 32011: 32013: 92017: 22018: 22019: 232023: 7, 2 Class I
2007high 25 (2009) · low 0 (2012)2026

Class I (2 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · CAC

128in 2025

2007: 352008: 122009: 682010: 1152011: 9392012: 2492013: 1532014: 902015: 872016: 732017: 882018: 872019: 642020: 1082021: 732022: 652023: 392024: 1292025: 128
2007high 939 (2011) · low 12 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code CAC, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—135
20081—512
20090—2568
201041233115
20112—3939
20123900249
20131—9153
20143269090
20150—087
20162—073
20171—288
20182—287
20191—2364
20201—0108
20214155073
20221—065
20232—7 (2)39
20243910129
20250—0128
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Haemonetics® Cardiovascular Perioperative Autotransfusion System (cardioPAT ) is indicated for use to salvage red blood cells from blood lost intraoperatively and postoperatively during cardiovascular surgical procedures, where the expected rate of processing of salvaged blood and fluid aspirated from the surgical site is less than or equal to two liters per hour. Autotransfasion is indicated for patients who meet at least one of the following…

Read the full statement (162 words)

The Haemonetics® Cardiovascular Perioperative Autotransfusion System (cardioPAT ) is indicated for use to salvage red blood cells from blood lost intraoperatively and postoperatively during cardiovascular surgical procedures, where the expected rate of processing of salvaged blood and fluid aspirated from the surgical site is less than or equal to two liters per hour.

Autotransfasion is indicated for patients who meet at least one of the following criteria:

* The patient is expected to lose sufficient blood in the perioperative period, so as to require red blood cell transfusion, and autotransfusion will likely reduce or eliminate the need for allogeneic blood transfusion.

* Religious beliefs cause the patient to refuse allogeneic transfusion, but accept autologous transfusion.

* Compatible allogeneic blood is not available.

* The patient is unable to donate sufficient quantities of autologous blood prior to surgery to adequately cover the anticipated transfusion requirement.

* The patient or physician prefers perioperative autotransfusion rather than preoperative autologous donation or transfusion of allogeneic blood.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K043127: Haemonetics Cardiovascular Perioperative Autotransfusion System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K043127

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026