510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Affinity (Cabinet Name), AC440, HIT440, or the Combination of Systems

K043219510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 4, 200574-day reviewClass II21 CFR 874.1050

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Interacoustics AS · EWO Audiometer

Cleared on Feb 4, 2005 after a 74-day review. FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Feb 4, 2005
Review
74 days
Class
Class II
Product code
EWO
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2015: 1 descendant cleared20052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK043219 Affinity (Cabinet Name), AC440, HIT440, or the Combination of SystemsInteracoustics AS · 2005
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK141524 Neuro-AudioTeleemg, LLC USA · 2015

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K141524Neuro-AudioTeleemg, LLC USA · 2015 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K043219Affinity (Cabinet Name), AC440, HIT440, or the Combination of SystemsInteracoustics AS2005—
+1K141524Neuro-AudioTeleemg, LLC USA2015—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K043219, 2005–2015Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA 510(k) statement (indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in EWO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new EWO device

  1. #1 K234095 OtoNova/OtoNova Proscore 9.3 · 7 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K141524Neuro-AudioTeleemg, LLC USA20150

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K141524 (Teleemg, LLC USA, 2015) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All EWO devices

EWO Audiometer: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · EWO

2in 2024

2007: 52008: 12009: 22010: 22011: 32012: 42013: 22014: 12015: 42017: 22018: 22019: 12022: 12023: 12024: 2
2007high 5 (2007) · low 0 (2016)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · EWO

173in 2015

2007: 69 days median2011: 151 days median2012: 137 days median2015: 173 days median
2007high 173 (2015) · low 69 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · EWO

4in 2023

2008: 12023: 4
2007high 4 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · EWO

13in 2025

2007: 12008: 12009: 12010: 42011: 22015: 12019: 62020: 72021: 32022: 62023: 32024: 22025: 13
2007high 13 (2025) · low 0 (2012)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code EWO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200756901
20081—11
20092—01
20102—04
2011315102
2012413700
20132—00
20141—00
2015417301
20160—00
20172—00
20182—00
20191—06
20200—07
20210—03
20221—06
20231—43
20242—02
20250—013
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The AC440 system is intended to be used for the detection and diagnosis of suspected hearing loss.

The HIT440 system is intended to be used as a means to get an objective indication of the characteristics of a hearing aid and as a help for making the adjustments of the hearing aid to the patient. It is used by manufacturers of hearing aids and in clinics for hearing aid fitting.

These two devices can either be sold individually or together in the same housing. The HIT440 system may also be used with other approved Hearing aid test chambers

Indications for use as stated in the FDA 510(k) statement.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K043219: Affinity (Cabinet Name), AC440, HIT440, or the Combination of Systems.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K043219

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026