510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Teratech Model 8IOC4, 8IOL4 & 10LAP4 Probes

K043278510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 13, 200417-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1570

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Teratech Corp. · ITX Transducer, Ultrasonic, Diagnostic

Cleared on Dec 13, 2004 after a 17-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 23 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Dec 13, 2004
Review
17 days
Class
Class II
Product code
ITX
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

23 later devices descend from it, 4 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2006: 2 descendants cleared2010: 1 descendant cleared2007: 1 descendant cleared2005: 1 descendant cleared2008: 1 descendant cleared2018: 1 descendant cleared2009: 1 descendant cleared2015: 2 descendants cleared2016: 2 descendants cleared2020: 2 descendants cleared2021: 1 descendant cleared2023: 3 descendants cleared2025: 3 descendants cleared2022: 1 descendant cleared2024: 1 descendant cleared200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK043278 Teratech Model 8IOC4, 8IOL4 & 10LAP4 ProbesTeratech Corp. · 2004
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 12 of its ownK050347 Modification to Cryocare CS Surgical SystemEndocare, Inc. · 2005
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 9 of its ownK060279 Cryocare CS Surgical SystemEndocare, Inc. · 2006 · Recalled
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 8 of its ownK101333 Cryocare CS Surgical SystemEndocare, Inc. · 2010 · Recalled
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 7 of its ownK141110 Cryocare CS Surgical SystemHealthtronics · 2015
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 7 of its ownK061153 Gynesonics EC6 TransducerGynesonics, Inc. · 2006

Showing 5 of 23 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2005: 12006: 22007: 12008: 12009: 12010: 12015: 22016: 22018: 12020: 22021: 12022: 12023: 32024: 12025: 3
2005high 3 (2023) · low 0 (2011)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 23 · See all
  • K050347Modification to Cryocare CS Surgical SystemEndocare, Inc. · 2005 · cites it directly12descendants
  • K060279Cryocare CS Surgical SystemEndocare, Inc. · 2006 · 2 generations on9descendants
  • K101333Cryocare CS Surgical SystemEndocare, Inc. · 2010 · cites it directly8descendants
  • K141110Cryocare CS Surgical SystemHealthtronics · 2015 · 2 generations on7descendants
  • K061153Gynesonics EC6 TransducerGynesonics, Inc. · 2006 · cites it directly7descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K043278Teratech Model 8IOC4, 8IOL4 & 10LAP4 ProbesTeratech Corp.2004—
+1K050347Modification to Cryocare CS Surgical SystemEndocare, Inc.2005—
+2K060279Cryocare CS Surgical SystemEndocare, Inc.20063
+1K101333Cryocare CS Surgical SystemEndocare, Inc.20102
+2K141110Cryocare CS Surgical SystemHealthtronics2015—
+1K061153Gynesonics EC6 TransducerGynesonics, Inc.2006—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200510
200620
200710
200810
200910
201010
201520
201620
201810
202020
202110
202210
202330
202410
202530
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K043278, 2004–2025Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in ITX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new ITX device

  1. #1 K260114 Align® Cover and Pad Guidance Toolscore 13.6 · 6 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (4)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—Philips L19-5
Named without a submission number
—
*—Teratech 10V5
Named without a submission number
—
*—Philips C8-4
Named without a submission number
—
*—Philips LAP L9-5
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (23)

See all 23

4 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K050347Modification to Cryocare CS Surgical SystemEndocare, Inc.200512
K101333Cryocare CS Surgical SystemEndocare, Inc.20108
K061153Gynesonics EC6 TransducerGynesonics, Inc.20067
K072266Acuson P50 Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.20071

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K050347 (Endocare, Inc., 2005) has gone furthest, with 12 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All ITX devices

ITX Transducer, Ultrasonic, Diagnostic: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · ITX

4in 2025

2007: 102008: 122009: 172010: 102011: 102012: 72013: 32014: 42015: 12016: 42017: 62018: 22019: 12020: 32021: 32022: 22023: 62024: 32025: 42026 (partial year): 6
2007high 17 (2009) · low 1 (2015)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · ITX

126in 2025

2007: 26 days median2008: 73 days median2009: 28 days median2010: 42 days median2011: 16 days median2012: 25 days median2013: 105 days median2014: 41 days median2016: 151 days median2017: 110 days median2020: 120 days median2021: 139 days median2023: 213 days median2024: 81 days median2025: 126 days median2026 (partial year): 158 days median
2007high 213 (2023) · low 16 (2011)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · ITX

2in 2025

2008: 42009: 42010: 42011: 12012: 12014: 12015: 52017: 12018: 152020: 32021: 10, 10 Class I2022: 62023: 12024: 12025: 2
2007high 15 (2018) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (10 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · ITX

571in 2025

2007: 162008: 392009: 232010: 302011: 342012: 292013: 382014: 432015: 1832016: 2692017: 4122018: 1302019: 1192020: 1162021: 1462022: 872023: 1382024: 9882025: 571
2007high 988 (2024) · low 16 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code ITX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071026016
20081273439
20091728423
20101042430
20111016134
2012725129
20133105038
2014441143
20151—5183
201641510269
201761101412
20182—15130
20191—0119
202031203116
2021313910 (10)146
20222—687
202362131138
20243811988
202541262571
202661580—

What is it indicated for?

Diagnostic ultrasound imaging or fluid flow analysis of the human body as follows: specific indications for use are tabulated in Section 4.3 of this submission.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K043278: Teratech Model 8IOC4, 8IOL4 & 10LAP4 Probes.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K043278

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026