510(k) · Cleared
ClearedGlaid Ocular Electrophysiology Device
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Lace Electronica S.R.L. · GWE Stimulator, Photic, Evoked Response
Cleared on Nov 17, 2005 after a 344-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 2 later devices descend from it.
- Decided
- Nov 17, 2005
- Review
- 344 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- GWE
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 0
2 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.
Most influential descendants
Showing 2 of 2 · See allView FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 (this device) | K043367 | Glaid Ocular Electrophysiology Device | Lace Electronica S.R.L. | 2005 | — |
| +1 | K081591 | Neucodia | Verisci Corporation | 2009 | — |
| +2 | K101763 | Diopsys Nova Vep Vision Testing System | Diopsys, Inc. | 2011 | — |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 1 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in GWE? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new GWE device
- #1 K211643 Vision Monitor - MonpackONEscore 5.0 · 2 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (3)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | — | Electro-Diagnostic Imaging, Inc. VERIS System Named without a submission number | |
| * | — | Doran Instruments Inc. Maculoscope Named without a submission number | |
| * | — | LKC Technologies Inc. Electroretinograph Named without a submission number |
What descends from it? (2)
1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
| Number | Device | Decided | Descendants |
|---|---|---|---|
| K081591 | Neucodia | 2009 | 1 |
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- Of its descendants, K081591 (Verisci Corporation, 2009) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.
How does its category compare?
All GWE devicesGWE Stimulator, Photic, Evoked Response: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · GWE
2in 2022
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · GWE
Too few GWE 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.
Recalls per year · GWE
1in 2015
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · GWE
1in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code GWE, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 0 | — | 1 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0 | — | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 1 | — | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 2 | — | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2026 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The GLAID device is indicated for use in the measurement of visual electrophysiologic potentials, including the electroretinogram (ERG), pattern electroretinogram (PERG), visual evoked potential (VEP) and electrooculogram (EOG), as an aid in the diagnosis and management of Glaucoma when used in conjunction with other established methods of diagnosis and disease management
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K043367 · printed Nov 4, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K043367: Glaid Ocular Electrophysiology Device.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K043367
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026