510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Wavelight Sinon

K050218510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 15, 200515-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.4810

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Wavelight Laser Technologie AG · GEX Powered Laser Surgical Instrument

Cleared on Feb 15, 2005 as substantially equivalent to K040433 (Wavelight Laser Technologie AG, 2004) and 5 other predicates after a 15-day review. Its family tree reaches back 9 generations to 1992.

Decided
Feb 15, 2005
Review
15 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GEX
Recalls
None
Predicates
6

Its longest line of descent runs back 9 generations to K910422 (1992). 102 ancestors in all, the oldest K820106 (1982). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 9 generations backK910422 Model RD-1200 Ruby Laser SystemSpectrum Medical Technologies, Inc. · 1992
  2. 5 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK022226 Altus Medical Family of Coolglide Lasers, Models Coolglide I…Altus Medical, Inc. · 2002
  4. 2 generations backK032220 Adept 1064/532 LaserAdept Medical Concepts · 2003
  5. 1 generation backK040384 Mydon CWavelight Laser Technologie AG · 2004
  6. This deviceK050218 Wavelight SinonWavelight Laser Technologie AG · 2005
Show all 9 generations
  1. Root · 9 generations backK910422 Model RD-1200 Ruby Laser SystemSpectrum Medical Technologies, Inc. · 1992
  2. 8 generations backK961279 Sharplan Lasers, Inc. Ruby Laser SystemSharplan Lasers, Inc. · 1996
  3. 7 generations backK962446 Sharplan Ruby Laser SystemSharplan Lasers, Inc. · 1997
  4. 6 generations backK974536 Photoderm HR SystemEsc Medical Systems, Ltd. · 1998
  5. 5 generations backK991935 Epilight Hair Removal System, Photoderm HR SystemEsc Medical Systems, Ltd. · 2000
  6. 4 generations backK014040 Family of Altus Medical Modified Coolglide Aesthetic Lasers, Models…Altus Medical, Inc. · 2002
  7. 3 generations backK022226 Altus Medical Family of Coolglide Lasers, Models Coolglide I…Altus Medical, Inc. · 2002
  8. 2 generations backK032220 Adept 1064/532 LaserAdept Medical Concepts · 2003
  9. 1 generation backK040384 Mydon CWavelight Laser Technologie AG · 2004
  10. This deviceK050218 Wavelight SinonWavelight Laser Technologie AG · 2005
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−9K910422Model RD-1200 Ruby Laser SystemSpectrum Medical Technologies, Inc.1992—
−8K961279Sharplan Lasers, Inc. Ruby Laser SystemSharplan Lasers, Inc.1996—
−7K962446Sharplan Ruby Laser SystemSharplan Lasers, Inc.1997—
−6K974536Photoderm HR SystemEsc Medical Systems, Ltd.1998—
−5K991935Epilight Hair Removal System, Photoderm HR SystemEsc Medical Systems, Ltd.2000—
−4K014040Family of Altus Medical Modified Coolglide Aesthetic Lasers, Models Coolglide…Altus Medical, Inc.2002—
−3K022226Altus Medical Family of Coolglide Lasers, Models Coolglide I, Coolglide II…Altus Medical, Inc.2002—
−2K032220Adept 1064/532 LaserAdept Medical Concepts2003—
−1K040384Mydon CWavelight Laser Technologie AG2004—
0 (this device)K050218Wavelight SinonWavelight Laser Technologie AG2005—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198210
198810
199010
199140
199350
199480
199560
199680
1997100
199870
199960
200090
2001120
2002130
200310
200410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K050218, 1992–2005Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GEX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new GEX device

  1. #1 K222064 The Alma Soprano Titaniumscore 38.1 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (6)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K040433SINON
Summary page 1
…Panel: Dermatology and Plastic Surgery 3. Predicate Devices This submission refers to the SINON device registered under 510(k) number K040433. Therefore the SINON described here is substantially equivalent to the SINON registered under 510(k) number K040433.…
Wavelight Laser Technologie AG2004—
*K991285Laser System Rubystar with Q-Switch and Normal Mode
Summary page 1
…K040433. The SINON laser system is furthermore substantially equivalent to the Aesculap-Meditec RubyStar Laser System with Normal and Q-Switch Mode (K99 1285), the Spectrum Medical Technologies RD-1200 (K910422), the MLT Laser Technologies Inc. MLT R694 (K9909002), the Mehi/Bioph…
Aesculap-Meditec North America1999—
*K910422Model RD-1200 Ruby Laser System
Summary page 1
…substantially equivalent to the Aesculap-Meditec RubyStar Laser System with Normal and Q-Switch Mode (K99 1285), the Spectrum Medical Technologies RD-1200 (K910422), the MLT Laser Technologies Inc. MLT R694 (K9909002), the Mehi/Biophile Inc. Chromos 694 (K971814) and WaveLights…
Spectrum Medical Technologies, Inc.1992—
*K990902Modification of MLT R694 Ruby Laser SystemMedical Laser Technologies, Ltd.1999—
*K971814Improvements to the Mehl Ruby Laser
Summary page 1
…(K99 1285), the Spectrum Medical Technologies RD-1200 (K910422), the MLT Laser Technologies Inc. MLT R694 (K9909002), the Mehi/Biophile Inc. Chromos 694 (K971814) and WaveLights SINON device (K040384). 0…
Mehl/Biophile Intl., Inc.1997—
*K040384Mydon C
Summary page 1
…hnologies RD-1200 (K910422), the MLT Laser Technologies Inc. MLT R694 (K9909002), the Mehi/Biophile Inc. Chromos 694 (K971814) and WaveLights SINON device (K040384). 0 021…
Wavelight Laser Technologie AG2004—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 13 years and passes through 6 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.0 years on median.
  • 3 of the 102 ancestors have a recall of any class.

How does its category compare?

All GEX devices

GEX Powered Laser Surgical Instrument: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · GEX

83in 2025

2007: 732008: 1072009: 692010: 502011: 412012: 452013: 462014: 612015: 472016: 512017: 672018: 512019: 412020: 522021: 532022: 602023: 522024: 822025: 832026 (partial year): 57
2007high 107 (2008) · low 41 (2011)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GEX

90in 2025

2007: 79 days median2008: 86 days median2009: 100 days median2010: 96 days median2011: 83 days median2012: 118 days median2013: 144 days median2014: 147 days median2015: 112 days median2016: 114 days median2017: 90 days median2018: 78 days median2019: 88 days median2020: 90 days median2021: 123 days median2022: 152 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 90 days median2025: 90 days median2026 (partial year): 90 days median
2007high 152 (2022) · low 78 (2018)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · GEX

3in 2024

2007: 92008: 22010: 42011: 182012: 52013: 32014: 62016: 12017: 5, 1 Class I2018: 52019: 62020: 12023: 62024: 32026 (partial year): 2
2007high 18 (2011) · low 0 (2009)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GEX

2,720in 2025

2007: 3422008: 2322009: 2092010: 1,7112011: 3,0242012: 2,0002013: 2,2362014: 2,0362015: 2,0992016: 2,5852017: 2,9772018: 3,5252019: 2,7092020: 2,1832021: 3,4652022: 2,2882023: 2,3372024: 2,1872025: 2,720
2007high 3,525 (2018) · low 209 (2009)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GEX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200773799342
2008107862232
2009691000209
2010509641,711
20114183183,024
20124511852,000
20134614432,236
20146114762,036
20154711202,099
20165111412,585
201767905 (1)2,977
2018517853,525
2019418862,709
2020529012,183
20215312303,465
20226015202,288
2023528762,337
2024829032,187
2025839002,720
202657902—

What is it indicated for?

1. In the Q-Switch Mode, for the cutting, vaporization, or ablation of soft tissue.

This includes the removal of tattoos and treatment of benign pigmented lesions.

2. In the Free-Running Mode, for the removal of unwanted hair in patients with

Fitzpatrick skin types of I and II.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K050218: Wavelight Sinon.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K050218

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026