510(k) · Cleared
ClearedFemtex and Private Label Plastic Applicator Tampons
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
First Quality Hygienic, Inc. · HEB Tampon, Menstrual, Unscented
Cleared on May 12, 2005 as substantially equivalent to K023479 (First Quality Hygienic, Inc., 2002) after a 58-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1989.
- Decided
- May 12, 2005
- Review
- 58 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- HEB
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 1
Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K896994 (1989). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.
- Root · 2 generations backK896994 Kotex Security Tampons (Several Type)Kimberly-Clark Corp. · 1989 · Recalled
- 1 generation backK023479 Femtex Tampons and Other Private Label Plastic Applicator Tampons…First Quality Hygienic, Inc. · 2002 · Recalled
- This deviceK050660 Femtex and Private Label Plastic Applicator TamponsFirst Quality Hygienic, Inc. · 2005
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −2 | K896994 | Kotex Security Tampons (Several Type) | Kimberly-Clark Corp. | 1989 | 1 |
| −1 | K023479 | Femtex Tampons and Other Private Label Plastic Applicator Tampons; Consumer… | First Quality Hygienic, Inc. | 2002 | 1 |
| 0 (this device) | K050660 | Femtex and Private Label Plastic Applicator Tampons | First Quality Hygienic, Inc. | 2005 | — |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in HEB? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new HEB device
- #1 K251033 Unscented menstrual long applicator tampon…score 14.3 · 6 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (1)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K023479 | Femtex Tampons and Other Private Label Plastic Applicator Tampons; Consumer Packages and…Summary page 1…and Private Label Slender Regular Plastic Applicator Tampons are substantially equivalent to legally marketed Femtex and other Private Label Plastic Applicator tampons (K023479). Device description: Femtex and Private Label Plastic Applicator Tampons are menstrual tampons used to absorb menstrual fluid.… | 2002 |
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 16 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 12.9 years on median.
- 2 of the 2 ancestors have a recall of any class.
How does its category compare?
All HEB devicesHEB Tampon, Menstrual, Unscented: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · HEB
6in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · HEB
82in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · HEB
29in 2025
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · HEB
452in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code HEB, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 0 | — | 0 | 38 |
| 2008 | 1 | — | 0 | 31 |
| 2009 | 7 | 136 | 0 | 30 |
| 2010 | 3 | 76 | 1 | 138 |
| 2011 | 3 | 28 | 1 | 291 |
| 2012 | 3 | 114 | 0 | 416 |
| 2013 | 2 | — | 0 | 259 |
| 2014 | 4 | 173 | 0 | 167 |
| 2015 | 5 | 114 | 0 | 132 |
| 2016 | 1 | — | 0 | 101 |
| 2017 | 2 | — | 0 | 194 |
| 2018 | 5 | 140 | 4 | 363 |
| 2019 | 7 | 182 | 0 | 3,034 |
| 2020 | 2 | — | 0 | 1,714 |
| 2021 | 6 | 60 | 0 | 1,403 |
| 2022 | 3 | 81 | 0 | 1,055 |
| 2023 | 5 | 109 | 0 | 702 |
| 2024 | 2 | — | 0 | 534 |
| 2025 | 6 | 82 | 29 | 452 |
| 2026 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
As a Class II Device, the menstrual tampon is defined as follows: (21CFR884.5460 and 21CFR 884 5470).
Ferntex and Private I abel Plastic Applicator Tampons are a plug of Cellulosic or synthetic material that is inserted into the vagina and -used to absorb menstrual or other vaginal discharge.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K050660 · printed Nov 3, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K050660: Femtex and Private Label Plastic Applicator Tampons.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 3, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K050660
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026