510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Cardioscope Sonoplus 3000

K051126510(k) TraditionalCleared May 19, 200516-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.2340

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Pulsonic Ag, Medical Technology · DPS Electrocardiograph

Cleared on May 19, 2005 as substantially equivalent to K990809 (Caditec AG, 1999) after a 16-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1995.

Decided
May 19, 2005
Review
16 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DPS
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K954066 (1995). 3 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 1996: 1 other ancestorK954066 · Miniscope MS-3 · Schiller America, Inc. · 1995K990809 · Cadiscope Electronic Stethoscope · Caditec AG · 1999199619982000200220042006
Other ancestors, by generation 2 generations back: 1 other ancestor K990809 · Cadiscope Electronic Stethoscope · Caditec AG · 1999K954066 · Miniscope MS-3 · Schiller America, Inc. · 19950
  1. Root · 2 generations backK954066 Miniscope MS-3Schiller America, Inc. · 1995
  2. 1 generation backK990809 Cadiscope Electronic StethoscopeCaditec AG · 1999
  3. This deviceK051126 Cardioscope Sonoplus 3000Pulsonic Ag, Medical Technology · 2005
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K954066Miniscope MS-3Schiller America, Inc.1995—
−1K990809Cadiscope Electronic StethoscopeCaditec AG1999—
0 (this device)K051126Cardioscope Sonoplus 3000Pulsonic Ag, Medical Technology2005—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K051126, 1995–2005Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DPS? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new DPS device

  1. #1 K212112 Cardiologs Holter Platformscore 18.6 · 5 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary; numbers the summary cites that cannot be its predicate are marked – and kept off the family tree.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K990809Cadiscope Electronic Stethoscope
Summary page 1
…ardiograph 9-Device Classification Name: Electrocardiograph 1O-Substantial Equivalency is claimed against the following device: CADITEC's CADISCOPE, 510k #K990809 11 -Description of the Device: This device SONOPLUS 3000 is a combination product that includes Electrocardiograph and manual St…
Caditec AG1999—
Kept off the family treeK980105Unnamed device
Not in FDA’s 510(k), De Novo or PMA lists as we hold them (a misreading, a typo, or a number FDA does not list), so it is kept off the family tree
Summary page 2
…attached. Indeed, this device is SIMILAR to the predicate device. REFER TO MAIN SUBMISSION FOR COMPLETE DETAILS FDA file reference number 510k# K980105 Attachments inside notification submission file 510Ok summary print out TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS Compar…

Also cleared against K990809: 5 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 10 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 5.9 years on median.
  • None of the 3 ancestors has a recall.
  • 5 other devices also cite its predicate K990809.

How does its category compare?

All DPS devices

DPS Electrocardiograph: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · DPS

6in 2025

2007: 112008: 132009: 142010: 112011: 222012: 122013: 102014: 112015: 82016: 112017: 92018: 142019: 32020: 62021: 52022: 62023: 102024: 82025: 62026 (partial year): 6
2007high 22 (2011) · low 3 (2019)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DPS

163in 2025

2007: 87 days median2008: 31 days median2009: 84 days median2010: 104 days median2011: 154 days median2012: 117 days median2013: 134 days median2014: 253 days median2015: 178 days median2016: 229 days median2017: 177 days median2018: 221 days median2019: 178 days median2020: 224 days median2021: 135 days median2022: 244 days median2023: 236 days median2024: 260 days median2025: 163 days median2026 (partial year): 258 days median
2007high 260 (2024) · low 31 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · DPS

3in 2025

2007: 22009: 12010: 22011: 12019: 92020: 22021: 12022: 12023: 32024: 4, 1 Class I2025: 32026 (partial year): 4
2007high 9 (2019) · low 0 (2008)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DPS

55in 2025

2007: 92008: 172009: 142010: 212011: 1212012: 562013: 152014: 152015: 302016: 122017: 152018: 192019: 272020: 592021: 242022: 592023: 542024: 642025: 55
2007high 121 (2011) · low 9 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DPS, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007118729
20081331017
20091484114
201011104221
2011221541121
201212117056
201310134015
201411253015
20158178030
201611229012
20179177015
201814221019
20193178927
20206224259
20215135124
20226244159
202310236354
202482604 (1)64
20256163355
202662584—

What is it indicated for?

This device is a patented combination device that includes Electrocardiograph and manual Stethoscope with an integrated graphics display of ECG signal, heart rate, presence of a pacemaker, as well as a standard acoustic stethoscope that reduces interference ("Anti-Interference System") This device is intended for use as a diagnostic aid as part of physical assessment of patient by healthcare professionals or other individuals trained to administer…

Read the full statement (160 words)

This device is a patented combination device that includes Electrocardiograph and manual Stethoscope with an integrated graphics display of ECG signal, heart rate, presence of a pacemaker, as well as a standard acoustic stethoscope that reduces interference ("Anti-Interference System")

This device is intended for use as a diagnostic aid as part of physical assessment of patient by healthcare professionals or other individuals trained to administer emergency first aid or otherwise care for a patient.

It can be used for the amplification of heart, lung, blood vessel, enteral and other body sounds.

When the device's integral electrodes are placed on the chest of the patient, it is capable of verifying, measuring, storing and transmitting to a database the cardiac biopotential activity. The quality of the biopotential activity display depends upon user technique and environmental conditions and it is in no way meant to be diagnostic.

SONOPLUS 3000 is not intended for use in intensive care. Simultaneous use with defibrillators is prohibited.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K051126: Cardioscope Sonoplus 3000.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K051126

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026