510(k) · Cleared
ClearedKika Imaging Lab Viewer, Model 2.0.1.0
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Kika Medical, Inc. · LLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological
Cleared on Jun 3, 2005 as substantially equivalent to K020995 (Efilm Medical, Inc., 2002) after a 31-day review. Its family tree reaches back 5 generations to 1990.
- Decided
- Jun 3, 2005
- Review
- 31 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- LLZ
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 1
Its longest line of descent runs back 5 generations to K896095 (1990). 6 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.
- Root · 5 generations backK896095 Images-on-Call Teleradiology SystemDevices & Services Co. · 1990
- 4 generations backK962699 Radworks Medical Imaging SoftwareApplicare Medical Imaging, B.V. · 1996
- 3 generations backK982862 Radworks Medical Imaging Software with Quality Control ModuleApplicare Medical Imaging, B.V. · 1998
- 2 generations backK012211 Efilm WorkstationEfilm Medical, Inc. · 2001 · Recalled
- 1 generation backK020995 Efilm Workstation with ModulesEfilm Medical, Inc. · 2002 · Recalled
- This deviceK051127 Kika Imaging Lab Viewer, Model 2.0.1.0Kika Medical, Inc. · 2005
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −5 | K896095 | Images-on-Call Teleradiology System | Devices & Services Co. | 1990 | — |
| −4 | K962699 | Radworks Medical Imaging Software | Applicare Medical Imaging, B.V. | 1996 | — |
| −3 | K982862 | Radworks Medical Imaging Software with Quality Control Module | Applicare Medical Imaging, B.V. | 1998 | — |
| −2 | K012211 | Efilm Workstation | Efilm Medical, Inc. | 2001 | 1 |
| −1 | K020995 | Efilm Workstation with Modules | Efilm Medical, Inc. | 2002 | 2 |
| 0 (this device) | K051127 | Kika Imaging Lab Viewer, Model 2.0.1.0 | Kika Medical, Inc. | 2005 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1991 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in LLZ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new LLZ device
- #1 K230955 syngo Application Softwarescore 21.5 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (2)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K020995 | Efilm Workstation with ModulesSummary page 1…eFilmTM WorkstationTM with Modules Predicate Device Manufacture: eFilm Medical, Inc. Predicate Device 510(k) Number: K020995 Date Received: Decision Date: Decision: Substantially Equivalent Panel Code Device Reviewe… | 2002 |
| * | — | UltrPro PACs Named without a submission number |
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 15 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.8 years on median.
- 2 of the 6 ancestors have a recall of any class.
- 14 other devices also cite its predicate K020995.
How does its category compare?
All LLZ devicesLLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · LLZ
58in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · LLZ
173in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · LLZ
11in 2025
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · LLZ
116in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code LLZ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 76 | 36 | 20 | 152 |
| 2008 | 94 | 52 | 32 | 154 |
| 2009 | 70 | 62 | 21 | 145 |
| 2010 | 51 | 98 | 17 | 145 |
| 2011 | 106 | 79 | 30 | 454 |
| 2012 | 82 | 87 | 12 | 266 |
| 2013 | 95 | 84 | 64 | 1,130 |
| 2014 | 78 | 89 | 6 | 15,631 |
| 2015 | 64 | 90 | 16 | 211 |
| 2016 | 82 | 90 | 12 | 290 |
| 2017 | 78 | 107 | 5 | 104 |
| 2018 | 104 | 105 | 7 | 72 |
| 2019 | 74 | 107 | 2 | 88 |
| 2020 | 81 | 115 | 6 | 82 |
| 2021 | 83 | 116 | 3 | 70 |
| 2022 | 65 | 137 | 4 | 28 |
| 2023 | 87 | 157 | 8 | 26 |
| 2024 | 62 | 131 | 6 | 42 |
| 2025 | 58 | 173 | 11 | 116 |
| 2026 | 45 | 110 | 14 | — |
What is it indicated for?
KIKA Imaging Lab is intended to be used for diagnostic image management, archiving, annotation, acceptance, transfer, display, storage, image processing of diagnostic ultrasound, CD, MRI, and X-ray images, including manipulation, compression and quantification of images. The KIKA Imaging Lab brings is typically used in web data sharing domains, especially in clinical trial management, post marketing surveillance, adverse event management, tele-expertise…
Read the full statement (123 words)
KIKA Imaging Lab is intended to be used for diagnostic image management, archiving, annotation, acceptance, transfer, display, storage, image processing of diagnostic ultrasound, CD, MRI, and X-ray images, including manipulation, compression and quantification of images.
The KIKA Imaging Lab brings is typically used in web data sharing domains, especially in clinical trial management, post marketing surveillance, adverse event management, tele-expertise or telemedicine.
When interpreted by a trained physician, reviewed images can be used as an element for diagnosis.
Lossy compressed mammographic images and digitized film screen images must not be reviewed for primary image interpretations. Mammographic images may only be interpreted using an FDA approved monitor that offers at least 5 Mpixel resolution and meets other technical specifications reviewed and accepted by FDA.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K051127 · printed Nov 4, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K051127: Kika Imaging Lab Viewer, Model 2.0.1.0.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K051127
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026