510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Gore Resolut Regenerative Material, Gore Resolut XT Regenerative Membrane, Gore Osseoquest Regenerative Membrane

K051267510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 15, 200530-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.3930

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · NPK Barrier, Synthetic, Intraoral

Cleared on Jun 15, 2005 as substantially equivalent to K960724 (Geistlich-Pharma, 1997) and 2 other predicates after a 30-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1997. 3 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Jun 15, 2005
Review
30 days
Class
Class II
Product code
NPK
Recalls
None
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K960724 (1997). 3 ancestors in all. 3 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2000: 1 other ancestor2013: 1 descendant cleared2010: 1 descendant cleared2011: 1 descendant clearedK960724 · Bio-Gide Resorbable Bilayer Membrane · Geistlich-Pharma · 1997K011695 · Collagen Dental Membrane · Collagen Matrix, Inc. · 2001 · recalled1995200020052010201520202025
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor 1 generation forward: 2 descendants2 generations forward: 1 descendant K011695 · Collagen Dental Membrane · Collagen Matrix, Inc. · 2001 · recalledK960724 · Bio-Gide Resorbable Bilayer Membrane · Geistlich-Pharma · 19970
  1. Root · 2 generations backK960724 Bio-Gide Resorbable Bilayer MembraneGeistlich-Pharma · 1997
  2. 1 generation backK011695 Collagen Dental MembraneCollagen Matrix, Inc. · 2001 · Recalled
  3. This deviceK051267 Gore Resolut Regenerative Material, Gore Resolut XT Regenerative…W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · 2005
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK091120 Medpor Contain ImplantPorex Surgical, Inc. · 2010
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK132325 Guidor Bioresorbable Matrix BarrierSunstar Americas, Inc. · 2013
  6. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK102184 Medpor Contain Can ImplantPorex Surgical, Inc. · 2011

Most influential descendants

Showing 3 of 3 · See all
  • K091120Medpor Contain ImplantPorex Surgical, Inc. · 2010 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K132325Guidor Bioresorbable Matrix BarrierSunstar Americas, Inc. · 2013 · cites it directly0descendants
  • K102184Medpor Contain Can ImplantPorex Surgical, Inc. · 2011 · 2 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K960724Bio-Gide Resorbable Bilayer MembraneGeistlich-Pharma1997—
−1K011695Collagen Dental MembraneCollagen Matrix, Inc.20011
0 (this device)K051267Gore Resolut Regenerative Material, Gore Resolut XT Regenerative Membrane…W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.2005—
+1K091120Medpor Contain ImplantPorex Surgical, Inc.2010—
+1K132325Guidor Bioresorbable Matrix BarrierSunstar Americas, Inc.2013—
+2K102184Medpor Contain Can ImplantPorex Surgical, Inc.2011—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200010

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201010
201110
201310
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K051267, 1997–2013Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in NPK? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new NPK device

  1. #1 K221851 Lumina-PTFE Titaniumscore 7.4 · 4 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K960724Bio-Gide Resorbable Bilayer Membrane
Summary page 1
…LUT® ADAPT Regenerative Membrane, and GORE RESOLUJT'~ ADAPT LT Regenerative Membrane 3. Predicate Devices: BIO-GIDE®' Resorbable Bilayer Membrane (K960724), BIOBAR Biodegradable Collagen Membrane (K001598), and Collagen Dental Membrane (K01 1695). 4. Device Des…
Geistlich-Pharma1997—
*K001598Biobar, Implantable Biodegradable Collagen Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration
Summary page 1
…T'~ ADAPT LT Regenerative Membrane 3. Predicate Devices: BIO-GIDE®' Resorbable Bilayer Membrane (K960724), BIOBAR Biodegradable Collagen Membrane (K001598), and Collagen Dental Membrane (K01 1695). 4. Device Description: These devices are composed of synthetic…
Col-Bar, Ltd.2000—
*K011695Collagen Dental Membrane
Summary page 1
…icate Devices: BIO-GIDE®' Resorbable Bilayer Membrane (K960724), BIOBAR Biodegradable Collagen Membrane (K001598), and Collagen Dental Membrane (K01 1695). 4. Device Description: These devices are composed of synthetic resorbable copolymers and have been desi…
Collagen Matrix, Inc.20011

Also cleared against K960724: 10 other devices →

What descends from it? (3)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K091120Medpor Contain ImplantPorex Surgical, Inc.20101
K132325Guidor Bioresorbable Matrix BarrierSunstar Americas, Inc.20130

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 8 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 4.2 years on median.
  • 1 of the 3 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K091120 (Porex Surgical, Inc., 2010) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.
  • 10 other devices also cite its predicate K960724.

How does its category compare?

All NPK devices

NPK Barrier, Synthetic, Intraoral: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · NPK

3in 2023

2009: 12010: 22011: 12013: 12015: 22016: 12017: 12021: 12022: 12023: 3
2007high 3 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · NPK

529in 2023

2023: 529 days median
2007high 529 (2023)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · NPK

No recall names NPK since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · NPK

3in 2022

2008: 12009: 22010: 132011: 352012: 172013: 62014: 12017: 12020: 12021: 22022: 3
2007high 35 (2011) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code NPK, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—01
20091—02
20102—013
20111—035
20120—017
20131—06
20140—01
20152—00
20161—00
20171—01
20180—00
20190—00
20200—01
20211—02
20221—03
2023352900
20240—00
20250—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

it is intended for use during the process of guided bone regeneration as a bioabsorbable membrane for supporting: augmentation around immediately placed endosseous implants or existing endosseous implants (e.g., dehiscence and fenestration defects, extraction sockets); ridge augmentation for later implantation of endosseous implants; and sinus procedures (e.g., sinus window, sinus lift).

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K051267: Gore Resolut Regenerative Material, Gore Resolut XT Regenerative Membrane, Gore Osseoquest Regenerative Membrane.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K051267

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026