510(k) · Cleared
ClearedLCR
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
3M Company · EMA Cement, Dental
Cleared on Sep 27, 2005 as substantially equivalent to K925032 (3M Company, 1992) and 2 other predicates after a 41-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1992. 6 later devices descend from it.
- Decided
- Sep 27, 2005
- Review
- 41 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- EMA
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 3
Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K925032 (1992). 3 ancestors in all. 6 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.
- Root · 1 generation backK925032 3M Vitremer Tri-Cure Glass Ionomer System3M Company · 1992
- This deviceK052235 LCR3M Company · 2005
- Descendant · cites it directly · 4 of its ownK130223 Rmgi FillPulpdent Corporation · 2013
- Descendant · 2 generations on · 1 of its ownK153249 Pulpdent Solo Flowable Composite with MCPPulpdent Corporation · 2016
- Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK250953 Equia LC OneGC America, Inc. · 2025
- Descendant · 3 generations on · 0 of its ownK210045 Activa Presto PackPulpdent Corporation · 2021
- Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK192530 Surefil one Self-adhesive Composite HybridDentsply Sirona · 2020
Showing 5 of 6 descendants. See all descendants
Descendants cleared per year
Most influential descendants
Showing 5 of 6 · See all- K130223Rmgi FillPulpdent Corporation · 2013 · cites it directly4descendants
- K153249Pulpdent Solo Flowable Composite with MCPPulpdent Corporation · 2016 · 2 generations on1descendant
- K250953Equia LC OneGC America, Inc. · 2025 · 2 generations on0descendants
- K210045Activa Presto PackPulpdent Corporation · 2021 · 3 generations on0descendants
- K192530Surefil one Self-adhesive Composite HybridDentsply Sirona · 2020 · 2 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | K925032 | 3M Vitremer Tri-Cure Glass Ionomer System | 3M Company | 1992 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K052235 | LCR | 3M Company | 2005 | — |
| +1 | K130223 | Rmgi Fill | Pulpdent Corporation | 2013 | — |
| +2 | K153249 | Pulpdent Solo Flowable Composite with MCP | Pulpdent Corporation | 2016 | — |
| +2 | K250953 | Equia LC One | GC America, Inc. | 2025 | — |
| +3 | K210045 | Activa Presto Pack | Pulpdent Corporation | 2021 | — |
| +2 | K192530 | Surefil one Self-adhesive Composite Hybrid | Dentsply Sirona | 2020 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1993 | 1 | 0 |
| 2000 | 1 | 0 |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 1 | 0 |
| 2016 | 2 | 0 |
| 2020 | 1 | 0 |
| 2021 | 1 | 0 |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in EMA? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new EMA device
- #1 K254109 G-Cem Universalscore 15.0 · 13 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (3)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K925032 | 3M Vitremer Tri-Cure Glass Ionomer SystemSummary page 1…me: .............. Dental Cement Common Name:..................Glass lonomer Restorative Predicate Devices: Vitremer Core Buildup/Restorative System.....K925032 Photac-Fil Aplicap .................. K925027 Fujii Il LC.............................K993973 LCR is… | 1992 |
| * | K925027 | Photac-Fil AplicapSummary page 1…......Glass lonomer Restorative Predicate Devices: Vitremer Core Buildup/Restorative System.....K925032 Photac-Fil Aplicap .................. K925027 Fujii Il LC.............................K993973 LCR is classified as a Dental Cement (21 C.F.R. § 872.3275) because it is… | 1993 |
| * | K993973 | Fuji II LC CapsuleSummary page 1…Vitremer Core Buildup/Restorative System.....K925032 Photac-Fil Aplicap .................. K925027 Fujii Il LC.............................K993973 LCR is classified as a Dental Cement (21 C.F.R. § 872.3275) because it is a resin modified glass ionomer base cement used as a… | 2000 |
What descends from it? (6)
2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
How does its category compare?
All EMA devicesEMA Cement, Dental: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · EMA
10in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · EMA
106in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · EMA
1in 2023
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · EMA
9in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code EMA, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 6 | 48 | 0 | 33 |
| 2008 | 13 | 71 | 2 | 50 |
| 2009 | 10 | 86 | 1 | 90 |
| 2010 | 14 | 86 | 1 | 106 |
| 2011 | 8 | 79 | 5 | 224 |
| 2012 | 10 | 128 | 0 | 249 |
| 2013 | 12 | 178 | 0 | 385 |
| 2014 | 4 | 174 | 0 | 207 |
| 2015 | 9 | 134 | 0 | 85 |
| 2016 | 10 | 182 | 0 | 16 |
| 2017 | 3 | 141 | 0 | 13 |
| 2018 | 3 | 237 | 0 | 4 |
| 2019 | 7 | 127 | 0 | 12 |
| 2020 | 8 | 164 | 0 | 5 |
| 2021 | 4 | 184 | 0 | 8 |
| 2022 | 7 | 245 | 0 | 3 |
| 2023 | 2 | — | 1 | 6 |
| 2024 | 3 | 59 | 0 | 5 |
| 2025 | 10 | 106 | 0 | 9 |
| 2026 | 7 | 150 | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
Primary teeth restorations
Small Class I restorations
Class III and Class V restorations
Transitional restorations
Filling defects and undercut areas in crown preparations
Core buildup where at least half the coronal tooth structure is remaining to provide structural support for the crown
Laminate sandwich technique
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K052235 · printed Nov 4, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K052235: LCR.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K052235
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026