510(k) · Cleared
ClearedStarlite 2006
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Laser Dental Innovations · GEX Powered Laser Surgical Instrument
Cleared on Dec 16, 2005 after an 86-day review. The summary cites one number, which could not be confirmed as its predicate (see the table below). 1 later device descends from it.
- Decided
- Dec 16, 2005
- Review
- 86 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- GEX
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 1
1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.
- This deviceK052604 Starlite 2006Laser Dental Innovations · 2005
- Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK082445 CURATIVE980 Diode LaserOroscience, Inc. · 2008
Most influential descendants
Showing 1 of 1 · See all- K082445CURATIVE980 Diode LaserOroscience, Inc. · 2008 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 (this device) | K052604 | Starlite 2006 | Laser Dental Innovations | 2005 | — |
| +1 | K082445 | CURATIVE980 Diode Laser | Oroscience, Inc. | 2008 | — |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in GEX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new GEX device
- #1 K222064 The Alma Soprano Titaniumscore 38.1 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (1)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary; numbers the summary cites that cannot be its predicate are marked – and kept off the family tree.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kept off the family tree | K091994 | FDA’s K091994 is Mountaineer Laminoplasty System Not matched in our reading of the summary (scans can blur digits), so it is kept off the family tree | 2010 |
What descends from it? (1)
1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
| Number | Device | Decided | Descendants |
|---|---|---|---|
| K082445 | CURATIVE980 Diode Laser | 2008 | 0 |
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- Of its descendants, K082445 (Oroscience, Inc., 2008) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
How does its category compare?
All GEX devicesGEX Powered Laser Surgical Instrument: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · GEX
83in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · GEX
90in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · GEX
3in 2024
Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · GEX
2,720in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code GEX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 73 | 79 | 9 | 342 |
| 2008 | 107 | 86 | 2 | 232 |
| 2009 | 69 | 100 | 0 | 209 |
| 2010 | 50 | 96 | 4 | 1,711 |
| 2011 | 41 | 83 | 18 | 3,024 |
| 2012 | 45 | 118 | 5 | 2,000 |
| 2013 | 46 | 144 | 3 | 2,236 |
| 2014 | 61 | 147 | 6 | 2,036 |
| 2015 | 47 | 112 | 0 | 2,099 |
| 2016 | 51 | 114 | 1 | 2,585 |
| 2017 | 67 | 90 | 5 (1) | 2,977 |
| 2018 | 51 | 78 | 5 | 3,525 |
| 2019 | 41 | 88 | 6 | 2,709 |
| 2020 | 52 | 90 | 1 | 2,183 |
| 2021 | 53 | 123 | 0 | 3,465 |
| 2022 | 60 | 152 | 0 | 2,288 |
| 2023 | 52 | 87 | 6 | 2,337 |
| 2024 | 82 | 90 | 3 | 2,187 |
| 2025 | 83 | 90 | 0 | 2,720 |
| 2026 | 57 | 90 | 2 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The Starlite 2006 will be used with the following lasers for the excision, ablation., vaporization and hemostasis of soft tissue. Diolase ST produced by American Dental Technologies (810 Nm operating wavelength) Twilight produced by Biolase (810 Nm operating wavelength) Diodent produced by Hoya Con Bio (810 Nm operating wavelength) Softlase produced by Zap Lasers (810 Nm operating wavelength) Aurora produced by Premier Lasers (810 Nm operating…
Read the full statement (130 words)
The Starlite 2006 will be used with the following lasers for the excision, ablation., vaporization and hemostasis of soft tissue.
Diolase ST produced by American Dental Technologies (810 Nm operating wavelength)
Twilight produced by Biolase (810 Nm operating wavelength)
Diodent produced by Hoya Con Bio (810 Nm operating wavelength)
Softlase produced by Zap Lasers (810 Nm operating wavelength)
Aurora produced by Premier Lasers (810 Nm operating wavelength)
indications of use summary statement:
The StarLite laser fiber optic can be used for all the of the lasers cited above as well as other diode soft tissue lasers operating using the same wavelengths.
The StarLite will become an integral part of the laser system and by default be cleared for the same indications and procedures as the laser it is deployed on
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K052604 · printed Nov 5, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K052604: Starlite 2006.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K052604
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026