510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Energist Ultra VPL Intense Pulse Light System

K060216510(k) TraditionalCleared Mar 16, 200648-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.4810

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Energist, Ltd. · GEX Powered Laser Surgical Instrument

Cleared on Mar 16, 2006 as substantially equivalent to K040659 (Mccue Plc, 2004) and 1 other predicate after a 48-day review. Its family tree reaches back 7 generations to 1992.

Decided
Mar 16, 2006
Review
48 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GEX
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 7 generations to K910422 (1992). 66 ancestors in all, the oldest K892514 (1990). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 2005: 1 other ancestor2004: 1 other ancestor2003: 3 other ancestors2002: 8 other ancestors2001: 1 other ancestor2000: 4 other ancestors1999: 3 other ancestors1998: 5 other ancestors1996: 7 other ancestors1995: 6 other ancestors1997: 6 other ancestors1994: 7 other ancestors1993: 3 other ancestors1991: 3 other ancestors1990: 1 other ancestorK910422 · Model RD-1200 Ruby Laser System · Spectrum Medical Technologies, Inc. · 1992K961279 · Sharplan Lasers, Inc. Ruby Laser System · Sharplan Lasers, Inc. · 1996K962446 · Sharplan Ruby Laser System · Sharplan Lasers, Inc. · 1997K974536 · Photoderm HR System · Esc Medical Systems, Ltd. · 1998K991935 · Epilight Hair Removal System, Photoderm HR System · Esc Medical Systems, Ltd. · 2000K020453 · Palomar Estelux Pulsed Light System and Palomar Coolroller · Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc. · 2002K040659 · Mccue PLC Energist Ultra Variable Pulsed Light System · Mccue Plc · 20041990199520002005
  1. Root · 7 generations backK910422 Model RD-1200 Ruby Laser SystemSpectrum Medical Technologies, Inc. · 1992
  2. 6 generations backK961279 Sharplan Lasers, Inc. Ruby Laser SystemSharplan Lasers, Inc. · 1996
  3. 5 generations backK962446 Sharplan Ruby Laser SystemSharplan Lasers, Inc. · 1997
  4. 4 generations backK974536 Photoderm HR SystemEsc Medical Systems, Ltd. · 1998
  5. 3 generations backK991935 Epilight Hair Removal System, Photoderm HR SystemEsc Medical Systems, Ltd. · 2000
  6. 2 generations backK020453 Palomar Estelux Pulsed Light System and Palomar CoolrollerPalomar Medical Technologies, Inc. · 2002
  7. 1 generation backK040659 Mccue PLC Energist Ultra Variable Pulsed Light SystemMccue Plc · 2004
  8. This deviceK060216 Energist Ultra VPL Intense Pulse Light SystemEnergist, Ltd. · 2006
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−7K910422Model RD-1200 Ruby Laser SystemSpectrum Medical Technologies, Inc.1992—
−6K961279Sharplan Lasers, Inc. Ruby Laser SystemSharplan Lasers, Inc.1996—
−5K962446Sharplan Ruby Laser SystemSharplan Lasers, Inc.1997—
−4K974536Photoderm HR SystemEsc Medical Systems, Ltd.1998—
−3K991935Epilight Hair Removal System, Photoderm HR SystemEsc Medical Systems, Ltd.2000—
−2K020453Palomar Estelux Pulsed Light System and Palomar CoolrollerPalomar Medical Technologies, Inc.2002—
−1K040659Mccue PLC Energist Ultra Variable Pulsed Light SystemMccue Plc2004—
0 (this device)K060216Energist Ultra VPL Intense Pulse Light SystemEnergist, Ltd.2006—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199010
199130
199330
199470
199560
199670
199760
199850
199930
200040
200110
200280
200330
200410
200510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K060216, 1992–2006Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GEX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new GEX device

  1. #1 K222064 The Alma Soprano Titaniumscore 38.1 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K040659Mccue PLC Energist Ultra Variable Pulsed Light System
Summary page 1
…ical instrument for use in General and Plastic Surgery and Dermatology Product code: GEX 21 CFR 878.4810 5.8 Legally marketed Predicate Devices McCue Energist ULTRA TM , K040659 Cyden IFL Professional System, K050165 5.9 Device Description The Energist ULTRA VPLTM System is a light based medical device tha…
Mccue Plc2004—
*K050165Modification to Ifl Professional System, Model C100
Summary page 1
…Plastic Surgery and Dermatology Product code: GEX 21 CFR 878.4810 5.8 Legally marketed Predicate Devices McCue Energist ULTRA TM , K040659 Cyden IFL Professional System, K050165 5.9 Device Description The Energist ULTRA VPLTM System is a light based medical device that delivers a beam of pulsed non-ionisin…
Cyden Limited2005—

Also cleared against K040659: 2 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 14 years and passes through 6 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.8 years on median.
  • 1 of the 66 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K040659.

How does its category compare?

All GEX devices

GEX Powered Laser Surgical Instrument: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · GEX

83in 2025

2007: 732008: 1072009: 692010: 502011: 412012: 452013: 462014: 612015: 472016: 512017: 672018: 512019: 412020: 522021: 532022: 602023: 522024: 822025: 832026 (partial year): 57
2007high 107 (2008) · low 41 (2011)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GEX

90in 2025

2007: 79 days median2008: 86 days median2009: 100 days median2010: 96 days median2011: 83 days median2012: 118 days median2013: 144 days median2014: 147 days median2015: 112 days median2016: 114 days median2017: 90 days median2018: 78 days median2019: 88 days median2020: 90 days median2021: 123 days median2022: 152 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 90 days median2025: 90 days median2026 (partial year): 90 days median
2007high 152 (2022) · low 78 (2018)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · GEX

3in 2024

2007: 92008: 22010: 42011: 182012: 52013: 32014: 62016: 12017: 5, 1 Class I2018: 52019: 62020: 12023: 62024: 32026 (partial year): 2
2007high 18 (2011) · low 0 (2009)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GEX

2,720in 2025

2007: 3422008: 2322009: 2092010: 1,7112011: 3,0242012: 2,0002013: 2,2362014: 2,0362015: 2,0992016: 2,5852017: 2,9772018: 3,5252019: 2,7092020: 2,1832021: 3,4652022: 2,2882023: 2,3372024: 2,1872025: 2,720
2007high 3,525 (2018) · low 209 (2009)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GEX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200773799342
2008107862232
2009691000209
2010509641,711
20114183183,024
20124511852,000
20134614432,236
20146114762,036
20154711202,099
20165111412,585
201767905 (1)2,977
2018517853,525
2019418862,709
2020529012,183
20215312303,465
20226015202,288
2023528762,337
2024829032,187
2025839002,720
202657902—

What is it indicated for?

The Energist ULTRA Th VPL Intense Pulsed Light System is intended for permanent hair reduction and the treatment of mild to moderate inflammatory Acne Vulgaris. It is also indicated for photocoagulation of dermatological vascular lesions, photothermolysis of blood vessels and the treatment of benign pigmented lesions. Intense Pulsed Light Energy / wavelengths (530 - 950nm) The 530 - 950nm intense pulsed wavelengths are indicated for: The treatment of…

Read the full statement (192 words)

The Energist ULTRA Th VPL Intense Pulsed Light System is intended for permanent hair reduction and the treatment of mild to moderate inflammatory Acne Vulgaris. It is also indicated for photocoagulation of dermatological vascular lesions, photothermolysis of blood vessels and the treatment of benign pigmented lesions.

Intense Pulsed Light Energy / wavelengths (530 - 950nm)

The 530 - 950nm intense pulsed wavelengths are indicated for:

The treatment of mild to moderate inflammatory Acne Vulgaris.

The treatment of benign pigmented epidermal and cutaneous lesions including warts, scars and striae.

The treatment of benign cutaneous vascular lesions including port wine stains, hemangiomas, facial, truncal and leg telangiectasias, rosacea, melasma, angiomas and spider angiomas, poikiloderma of Civatte, leg veins, facial veins and venous malformations.

Intense Pulsed Light Energy / wavelengths (610- 95Ohm)

The 610 - 950nm intense pulsed wavelengths are indicated for:

The removal of unwanted hair from all skin types and to effect stable long-term or permanent ' hair reduction in skin types I - V through selective targeting of melanin in hair follicles.

Permanent hair reduction is defined as a long-term stable reduction in the number of hairs regrowing after a treatment regimen.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K060216: Energist Ultra VPL Intense Pulse Light System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K060216

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026