510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2014

Trokamed GMBH Electrosurgical Instruments & Accessories

K060232510(k) TraditionalCleared Jul 12, 2006163-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.4400Recalls 10

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Trokamed GmbH · GEI Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories

Cleared on Jul 12, 2006 as substantially equivalent to K973341 (Richard Wolf Medical Instruments Corp., 1997) and 5 other predicates after a 163-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1994. 1 later device descends from it. It has been recalled 10 times.

Decided
Jul 12, 2006
Review
163 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GEI
Recalls
10
Predicates
6

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K945975 (1994). 15 ancestors in all, the oldest K913281 (1991). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2004: 1 other ancestor1997: 4 other ancestors1996: 2 other ancestors1998: 1 other ancestor1994: 1 other ancestor1991: 1 other ancestor1995: 2 other ancestors2026: 1 descendant clearedK945975 · Evershears (R) Scissors, Bilap (R) Probes, Bicoag (R) Forceps · Everest Medical Corp. · 1994K972558 · Bipolar Scissors · Enable Medical Corp. · 1997K042077 · Bitech Bipolar Scissors · Guenter Bissinger Medizintechnik GmbH · 20041990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 5 other ancestors2 generations back: 3 other ancestors3 generations back: 4 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 1 descendant K042077 · Bitech Bipolar Scissors · Guenter Bissinger Medizintechnik GmbH · 2004K972558 · Bipolar Scissors · Enable Medical Corp. · 1997K945975 · Evershears (R) Scissors, Bilap (R) Probes, Bicoag (R) Forceps · Everest Medical Corp. · 19940
  1. Root · 3 generations backK945975 Evershears (R) Scissors, Bilap (R) Probes, Bicoag (R) ForcepsEverest Medical Corp. · 1994
  2. 2 generations backK972558 Bipolar ScissorsEnable Medical Corp. · 1997
  3. 1 generation backK042077 Bitech Bipolar ScissorsGuenter Bissinger Medizintechnik GmbH · 2004
  4. This deviceK060232 Trokamed GMBH Electrosurgical Instruments & AccessoriesTrokamed GmbH · 2006
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK261179 AlphaTriPart - Monopolar MIC InstrumentsGimmi GmbH · 2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K261179AlphaTriPart - Monopolar MIC InstrumentsGimmi GmbH · 2026 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K945975Evershears (R) Scissors, Bilap (R) Probes, Bicoag (R) ForcepsEverest Medical Corp.1994—
−2K972558Bipolar ScissorsEnable Medical Corp.1997—
−1K042077Bitech Bipolar ScissorsGuenter Bissinger Medizintechnik GmbH2004—
0 (this device)K060232Trokamed GMBH Electrosurgical Instruments & AccessoriesTrokamed GmbH2006—
+1K261179AlphaTriPart - Monopolar MIC InstrumentsGimmi GmbH2026—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199110
199410
199520
199620
199740
199810
200410

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
202610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K060232, 1994–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GEI? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new GEI device

  1. #1 K231790 The InMode System with the Morpheus8 Applicatorsscore 32.7 · 21 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (6)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K973341Hook Electrode, Needle Electrode, Coagulation Button Electrode
Summary page 2
…and reused. 4. SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE Manufacturer 510(k) Number Device name A Richard Wolf K973341 Unipolar electrodes B Valleylab K964602 Valleylab…
Richard Wolf Medical Instruments Corp.1997—
*K964602Davis Bayonet Electrodes
Summary page 2
…ber Device name A Richard Wolf K973341 Unipolar electrodes B Valleylab K964602 Valleylab coated electrodes C Megadyne K040699 Le…
Valleylab, Inc.1997—
*K040699Laparoscopic Electrode, Reusable Indicator Shaft (Leris)
Summary page 2
…Unipolar electrodes B Valleylab K964602 Valleylab coated electrodes C Megadyne K040699 Leris D Bissinger K042077 BiTech Bipolar Scissors…
Megadyne Medical Products, Inc.2004—
*K042077Bitech Bipolar Scissors
Summary page 2
…Valleylab coated electrodes C Megadyne K040699 Leris D Bissinger K042077 BiTech Bipolar Scissors E Karl Storz K960757 Karl S…
Guenter Bissinger Medizintechnik GmbH2004—
*K960757Karl Storz Ureter Resectoscope
Summary page 2
…Leris D Bissinger K042077 BiTech Bipolar Scissors E Karl Storz K960757 Karl Storz Ureter Resectoscope F COMEG Endoscopy K971881…
KARL STORZ Endoscopy-America, Inc.1996—
*K971881Comeg Resectoscope and Laser-Resectoscope Working…
Summary page 2
…BiTech Bipolar Scissors E Karl Storz K960757 Karl Storz Ureter Resectoscope F COMEG Endoscopy K971881 Comeg Resectoscope and... 5. BIOCOMPATIBILITY The biocompatibility has been approved based on ISO 109…
Comeg Endoscopy1997—

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K261179AlphaTriPart - Monopolar MIC InstrumentsGimmi GmbH20260

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
May 30, 2014Class IIZ-2729-2014Labeling designAdditional caution statements have been added to the Instructions For Use for monopolar electrodes. 1) To avoid tissue carbonation, the operation voltage of the HF generator must not exceed 650 peak voltage (Vp) for all monopolar…
May 30, 2014Class IIZ-2722-2014Labeling designAdditional caution statements have been added to the Instructions For Use for monopolar electrodes. 1) To avoid tissue carbonation, the operation voltage of the HF generator must not exceed 650 peak voltage (Vp) for all monopolar…
May 30, 2014Class IIZ-2721-2014Labeling designAdditional caution statements have been added to the Instructions For Use for monopolar electrodes. 1) To avoid tissue carbonation, the operation voltage of the HF generator must not exceed 650 peak voltage (Vp) for all monopolar…
May 30, 2014Class IIZ-2728-2014Labeling designAdditional caution statements have been added to the Instructions For Use for monopolar electrodes. 1) To avoid tissue carbonation, the operation voltage of the HF generator must not exceed 650 peak voltage (Vp) for all monopolar…
May 30, 2014Class IIZ-2725-2014Labeling designAdditional caution statements have been added to the Instructions For Use for monopolar electrodes. 1) To avoid tissue carbonation, the operation voltage of the HF generator must not exceed 650 peak voltage (Vp) for all monopolar…
May 30, 2014Class IIZ-2727-2014Labeling designAdditional caution statements have been added to the Instructions For Use for monopolar electrodes. 1) To avoid tissue carbonation, the operation voltage of the HF generator must not exceed 650 peak voltage (Vp) for all monopolar…
May 30, 2014Class IIZ-2726-2014Labeling designAdditional caution statements have been added to the Instructions For Use for monopolar electrodes. 1) To avoid tissue carbonation, the operation voltage of the HF generator must not exceed 650 peak voltage (Vp) for all monopolar…
May 30, 2014Class IIZ-2723-2014Labeling designAdditional caution statements have been added to the Instructions For Use for monopolar electrodes. 1) To avoid tissue carbonation, the operation voltage of the HF generator must not exceed 650 peak voltage (Vp) for all monopolar…
May 30, 2014Class IIZ-2730-2014Labeling designAdditional caution statements have been added to the Instructions For Use for monopolar electrodes. 1) To avoid tissue carbonation, the operation voltage of the HF generator must not exceed 650 peak voltage (Vp) for all monopolar…
May 30, 2014Class IIZ-2724-2014Labeling designAdditional caution statements have been added to the Instructions For Use for monopolar electrodes. 1) To avoid tissue carbonation, the operation voltage of the HF generator must not exceed 650 peak voltage (Vp) for all monopolar…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 12 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.8 years on median.
  • 2 of the 15 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K261179 (Gimmi GmbH, 2026) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All GEI devices

GEI Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · GEI

52in 2025

2007: 502008: 612009: 422010: 462011: 352012: 392013: 482014: 492015: 472016: 642017: 522018: 472019: 482020: 592021: 462022: 552023: 652024: 592025: 522026 (partial year): 43
2007high 65 (2023) · low 35 (2011)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GEI

113in 2025

2007: 51 days median2008: 71 days median2009: 130 days median2010: 109 days median2011: 135 days median2012: 133 days median2013: 136 days median2014: 103 days median2015: 123 days median2016: 108 days median2017: 72 days median2018: 93 days median2019: 93 days median2020: 105 days median2021: 146 days median2022: 150 days median2023: 104 days median2024: 125 days median2025: 113 days median2026 (partial year): 183 days median
2007high 183 (2026) · low 51 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · GEI

4in 2025

2007: 212008: 192009: 272010: 512011: 322012: 302013: 132014: 32015: 42016: 32017: 22018: 62019: 52020: 12021: 62022: 492023: 27, 4 Class I2024: 22, 10 Class I2025: 42026 (partial year): 8
2007high 51 (2010) · low 1 (2020)2026

Class I (14 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GEI

7,592in 2025

2007: 2,7952008: 2,5562009: 3,5912010: 3,3772011: 4,4632012: 5,2162013: 4,8972014: 4,9082015: 4,9362016: 5,6162017: 6,0732018: 6,5452019: 7,0672020: 6,4902021: 6,3542022: 6,1032023: 7,1762024: 7,8972025: 7,592
2007high 7,897 (2024) · low 2,556 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GEI, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20075051212,795
20086171192,556
200942130273,591
201046109513,377
201135135324,463
201239133305,216
201348136134,897
20144910334,908
20154712344,936
20166410835,616
2017527226,073
2018479366,545
2019489357,067
20205910516,490
20214614666,354
202255150496,103
20236510427 (4)7,176
20245912522 (10)7,897
20255211347,592
2026431838—

What is it indicated for?

The Trokamed GmbH Resectoscope & Accessories are indicated for the resection of prostate tissue.

The Trokamed GmbH Monopolar Electrodes are intended for use in minimal invasive techniques where unipolar electrosurgical cutting and coagulation are normally used.

The Trokamed GmbH Bipolar Electrodes are intended for use in minimal invasive techniques where bipolar electrosurgical cutting and coagulation are normally used.

The instruments are reusable; they are intended to be cleaned, sterilized and reused.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K060232: Trokamed GMBH Electrosurgical Instruments & Accessories.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 3, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K060232

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026