510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Lapidus Plate

K060476510(k) TraditionalCleared May 17, 200683-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3030

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

New Deal, S.A. · HRS Plate, Fixation, Bone

Cleared on May 17, 2006 as substantially equivalent to K033639 (Acumed, LLC, 2004) and 2 other predicates after an 83-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 2000. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
May 17, 2006
Review
83 days
Class
Class II
Product code
HRS
Recalls
None
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K000684 (2000). 16 ancestors in all, the oldest K890939 (1989). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2001: 2 other ancestors2000: 1 other ancestor2002: 1 other ancestor1998: 3 other ancestors1995: 2 other ancestors1992: 1 other ancestor1991: 1 other ancestor1989: 1 other ancestor2007: 1 descendant clearedK000684 · Small Fragment Dynamic Compression Locking (DCL) System · Synthes (Usa) · 2000 · recalled×2: 2 generations cleared close together, K011335 (2001), K012655 (2001) K033639 · Acumed Lower Extremity Congruent Plate System · Acumed, LLC · 2004 · recalled1990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 2 other ancestors2 generations back: 4 other ancestors3 generations back: 6 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 1 descendant K033639 · Acumed Lower Extremity Congruent Plate System · Acumed, LLC · 2004 · recalledK012655 · Congruent Bone Plate System · Acu Med, Inc. · 2001 · recalledK011335 · Synths One-Third Tubular DCL Plate · Synthes (Usa) · 2001 · recalledK000684 · Small Fragment Dynamic Compression Locking (DCL) System · Synthes (Usa) · 2000 · recalled0
  1. Root · 4 generations backK000684 Small Fragment Dynamic Compression Locking (DCL) SystemSynthes (Usa) · 2000 · Recalled
  2. 3 generations backK011335 Synths One-Third Tubular DCL PlateSynthes (Usa) · 2001 · Recalled
  3. 2 generations backK012655 Congruent Bone Plate SystemAcu Med, Inc. · 2001 · Recalled
  4. 1 generation backK033639 Acumed Lower Extremity Congruent Plate SystemAcumed, LLC · 2004 · Recalled
  5. This deviceK060476 Lapidus PlateNew Deal, S.A. · 2006
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK070241 Modification to Lapidus PlateNew Deal, S.A. · 2007 · Recalled

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K070241Modification to Lapidus PlateNew Deal, S.A. · 2007 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−4K000684Small Fragment Dynamic Compression Locking (DCL) SystemSynthes (Usa)20001
−3K011335Synths One-Third Tubular DCL PlateSynthes (Usa)20012
−2K012655Congruent Bone Plate SystemAcu Med, Inc.200116
−1K033639Acumed Lower Extremity Congruent Plate SystemAcumed, LLC200410
0 (this device)K060476Lapidus PlateNew Deal, S.A.2006—
+1K070241Modification to Lapidus PlateNew Deal, S.A.20071

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198910
199110
199210
199520
199830
200010
200120
200210

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200710
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K060476, 2000–2007Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HRS? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new HRS device

  1. #1 K222465 Tyber Medical Anatomical Plating Systemscore 27.5 · 16 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K033639Acumed Lower Extremity Congruent Plate System
Summary page 1
…ation Panel: Orthopedic Substantial Equivalence: The Lapidus Plate is substantially equivalent to the Acumned Lower Extremity Congruent Hone Plate System, K033639 the Synthes Modular Foot System - 2.7 nun Module, K010321 and the Synthes Modular Foot System, K001941.…
Acumed, LLC200410
*K010321Modular Foot System - 2.7 MM Module
Summary page 1
…dus Plate is substantially equivalent to the Acumned Lower Extremity Congruent Hone Plate System, K033639 the Synthes Modular Foot System - 2.7 nun Module, K010321 and the Synthes Modular Foot System, K001941. 2…
Synthes (Usa)2001—
*K001941Synthes Modular Foot System
Summary page 1
…Acumned Lower Extremity Congruent Hone Plate System, K033639 the Synthes Modular Foot System - 2.7 nun Module, K010321 and the Synthes Modular Foot System, K001941. 2…
Synthes (Usa)20001

Also cleared against K033639: 5 other devices →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K070241Modification to Lapidus PlateNew Deal, S.A.20070

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 6 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.2 years on median.
  • 6 of the 16 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K070241 (New Deal, S.A., 2007) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 5 other devices also cite its predicate K033639.

How does its category compare?

All HRS devices

HRS Plate, Fixation, Bone: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · HRS

54in 2025

2007: 352008: 352009: 472010: 492011: 432012: 592013: 562014: 762015: 562016: 442017: 572018: 402019: 462020: 482021: 402022: 472023: 402024: 542025: 542026 (partial year): 51
2007high 76 (2014) · low 35 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HRS

90in 2025

2007: 63 days median2008: 87 days median2009: 85 days median2010: 100 days median2011: 88 days median2012: 106 days median2013: 89 days median2014: 57 days median2015: 97 days median2016: 109 days median2017: 122 days median2018: 116 days median2019: 89 days median2020: 88 days median2021: 87 days median2022: 144 days median2023: 120 days median2024: 96 days median2025: 90 days median2026 (partial year): 82 days median
2007high 144 (2022) · low 57 (2014)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · HRS

1in 2025

2007: 22008: 112009: 32010: 162011: 52012: 42013: 112015: 72016: 52017: 32018: 22019: 252020: 12021: 92022: 32023: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 3
2007high 25 (2019) · low 0 (2014)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HRS

2,306in 2025

2007: 3392008: 3112009: 4352010: 4912011: 7732012: 1,6632013: 2,6432014: 2,4132015: 3,0952016: 2,2762017: 2,2202018: 2,6632019: 3,3592020: 2,7902021: 2,4422022: 1,7002023: 2,0492024: 1,8492025: 2,306
2007high 3,359 (2019) · low 311 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HRS, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200735632339
2008358711311
200947853435
20104910016491
201143885773
20125910641,663
20135689112,643
2014765702,413
2015569773,095
20164410952,276
20175712232,220
20184011622,663
20194689253,359
2020488812,790
2021408792,442
20224714431,700
20234012012,049
2024549601,849
2025549012,306
202651823—

What is it indicated for?

The NEWDEAL Lapidus Plates are intended to be used for bone fixation such as:

- arthrodesis of the 1st metatarsocuneiform joint to reposition and stabilize a metatarsus primus varus,

- Lisfranc arthrodesis

- mono or bi-cortical osteotomies or fractures near the 1s metatarsocuneiform joint.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K060476: Lapidus Plate.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K060476

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026