510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2020

N Latex CDT

K060677510(k) TraditionalCleared Aug 25, 2006164-day reviewClass I21 CFR 862.1360Recalls 2

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Dade Behring, Inc. · NAO Test, Carbohydrate Deficient Transferrin

Cleared on Aug 25, 2006 as substantially equivalent to K992502 (Axis, 1999) after a 164-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1999. 1 later device descends from it. It has been recalled 2 times.

Decided
Aug 25, 2006
Review
164 days
Class
Class I
Product code
NAO
Recalls
2
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K992502 (1999). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2011: 1 descendant clearedK992502 · Axis %CDT Turbidimetric Immunoassay · Axis · 19991995200020052010201520202025
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 1 descendant K992502 · Axis %CDT Turbidimetric Immunoassay · Axis · 19990
  1. Root · 1 generation backK992502 Axis %CDT Turbidimetric ImmunoassayAxis · 1999
  2. This deviceK060677 N Latex CDTDade Behring, Inc. · 2006
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK110169 Dimension Vista CDT Cal, Dimension Vista CDT Con L, Dimension Vista…Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics · 2011

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K110169Dimension Vista CDT Cal, Dimension Vista CDT Con L, Dimension Vista CDT Con HSiemens Healthcare Diagnostics · 2011 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K992502Axis %CDT Turbidimetric ImmunoassayAxis1999—
0 (this device)K060677N Latex CDTDade Behring, Inc.2006—
+1K110169Dimension Vista CDT Cal, Dimension Vista CDT Con L, Dimension Vista CDT Con HSiemens Healthcare Diagnostics2011—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201110
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K060677, 1999–2011Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in NAO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K992502Axis %CDT Turbidimetric Immunoassay
Summary page 1
…nical Chemistry (75) Product Code: NAO 3. Identification of the Legally Marketed Device: Axis-Shield %CDT Assay - K992502 4. Device Description: The CDT in the sample competes with CDT-coated polystyrene particles for the bond t…
Axis1999—

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K110169Dimension Vista CDT Cal, Dimension Vista CDT Con L, Dimension Vista CDT Con HSiemens Healthcare Diagnostics20110

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Mar 2, 2020Class IIZ-1790-2020Under Investigation by firmNegative bias for the carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) measurement in comparison to the HPLC method, observed to occur after 15 months based on shelf life monitoring
May 31, 2018Class IIZ-2931-2018Under Investigation by firmSiemens Healthcare Diagnostics has observed a negative bias for the carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) measurement when using the affected N Latex CDT lots in comparison to the HPLC method. CDT results in absolute concentrations may…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • Of its descendants, K110169 (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, 2011) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All NAO devices

NAO Test, Carbohydrate Deficient Transferrin: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · NAO

FDA has decided no NAO device since 2007.

Median 510(k) review, days · NAO

Too few NAO 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · NAO

No recall names NAO since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · NAO

No MAUDE report names NAO since 2007.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—00
20110—00
20120—00
20130—00
20140—00
20150—00
20160—00
20170—00
20180—00
20190—00
20200—00
20210—00
20220—00
20230—00
20240—00
20250—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

In vitro diagnostic for the quantitative determination of carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) in human serum by means of particle-enhanced immunonephelometry using the BNTM IIand BN ProSpec® System. The N Latex CDT assay must be run concurrently with the N Antisera to Human Transferrin assay so that the result can be expressed as a relative ratio, i.e., %CDT of the total transferrin. The calculation of %CDT can be used as a tool to identify possible chronic heavy alcohol consumption.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K060677: N Latex CDT.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K060677

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026