510(k) · Cleared
Recalled · 2010Trabecular Metal Acetabular Augments
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Zimmer Trabecular · LPH Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented
Cleared on May 25, 2006 as substantially equivalent to K042871 (Zimmer Trabecular, 2004) and 2 other predicates after a 38-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 2000. 79 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 4 times.
- Decided
- May 25, 2006
- Review
- 38 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- LPH
- Recalls
- 4
- Predicates
- 3
Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K001471 (2000). 3 ancestors in all. 79 later devices descend from it, 5 citing it directly.
- Root · 1 generation backK001471 The Implex Hedrocel Acetabular Augment, XX-Yyy-ZZZZImplex Corp. · 2000
- This deviceK061067 Trabecular Metal Acetabular AugmentsZimmer Trabecular · 2006
- Descendant · cites it directly · 53 of its ownK100391 Depuy Universal Gription TF ConesDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2010
- Descendant · 2 generations on · 40 of its ownK143393 Triathlon Tritanium Cone AugmentsStryker Orthopaedics · 2015 · Recalled
- Descendant · 3 generations on · 24 of its ownK172326 Triathlon Total Knee System, Triathlon PKR System, Restoris MCK Knee…Stryker Orthopaedics · 2017 · Recalled
- Descendant · cites it directly · 21 of its ownK102019 Restoration Acetabular Wedge AugmentsHowmedica Osteonics · 2011 · Recalled
- Descendant · 2 generations on · 17 of its ownK153345 Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Systems Labeling UpdateStryker Orthopaedics · 2016 · Recalled
Showing 5 of 79 descendants. See all descendants
Descendants cleared per year
Most influential descendants
Showing 5 of 79 · See all- K100391Depuy Universal Gription TF ConesDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2010 · cites it directly53descendants
- K143393Triathlon Tritanium Cone AugmentsStryker Orthopaedics · 2015 · 2 generations on40descendants
- K172326Triathlon Total Knee System, Triathlon PKR System, Restoris MCK Knee SystemStryker Orthopaedics · 2017 · 3 generations on24descendants
- K102019Restoration Acetabular Wedge AugmentsHowmedica Osteonics · 2011 · cites it directly21descendants
- K153345Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Systems Labeling UpdateStryker Orthopaedics · 2016 · 2 generations on17descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | K001471 | The Implex Hedrocel Acetabular Augment, XX-Yyy-ZZZZ | Implex Corp. | 2000 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K061067 | Trabecular Metal Acetabular Augments | Zimmer Trabecular | 2006 | — |
| +1 | K100391 | Depuy Universal Gription TF Cones | DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | 2010 | — |
| +2 | K143393 | Triathlon Tritanium Cone Augments | Stryker Orthopaedics | 2015 | 1 |
| +3 | K172326 | Triathlon Total Knee System, Triathlon PKR System, Restoris MCK Knee System | Stryker Orthopaedics | 2017 | 1 |
| +1 | K102019 | Restoration Acetabular Wedge Augments | Howmedica Osteonics | 2011 | 1 |
| +2 | K153345 | Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Systems Labeling Update | Stryker Orthopaedics | 2016 | 1 |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 1 | 0 |
| 2004 | 1 | 0 |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 1 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1 | 0 |
| 2012 | 1 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1 | 0 |
| 2016 | 2 | 0 |
| 2017 | 1 | 0 |
| 2018 | 5 | 0 |
| 2019 | 4 | 0 |
| 2020 | 10 | 0 |
| 2021 | 3 | 0 |
| 2022 | 7 | 0 |
| 2023 | 5 | 0 |
| 2024 | 11 | 0 |
| 2025 | 18 | 0 |
| 2026 | 8 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in LPH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new LPH device
- #1 K233498 Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Systems Labeling Updatescore 24.3 · 20 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (3)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K042871 | Trabecular Metal Acetabular Augments, Models 4894-XXX-YY, 02-212-105XX3, 02-212-205XX3…Summary page 2…vices: The predicated devices for which substantial equivalence has been documented herein are: K042871 - Trabecular Metal Acetabular Augments (12/31/04, Zimmer TMT)… | 2004 |
| * | K012507 | The Trabecular Metal Technology Acetabular Augment System, Models 4893-XX-YY (Zimmer)…Summary page 2…K042871 - Trabecular Metal Acetabular Augments (12/31/04, Zimmer TMT) K012507 - The Trabecular Metal Technology Acetabufar Augment System (8/30/01, Implex Corp.)… | 2001 |
| * | K001471 | The Implex Hedrocel Acetabular Augment, XX-Yyy-ZZZZSummary page 2…K012507 - The Trabecular Metal Technology Acetabufar Augment System (8/30/01, Implex Corp.) K001471 - The Implex Hedrocel Acetabular Augment System (8/7/00, Implex Corp.) Conclusion:… | 2000 |
What descends from it? (79)
See all 795 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
| Number | Device | Decided | Descendants |
|---|---|---|---|
| K100391 | Depuy Universal Gription TF Cones | 2010 | 53 |
| K102019 | Restoration Acetabular Wedge Augments | 2011 | 21 |
| K241636 | MobileLink Acetabular Cup System - Line Extension (Multiple) | 2024 | 2 |
| K113296 | ZMR Hip System KWZ-Prosthesis, Hip, Constrained, Cemented or Uncemented, Metal/Polymer | 2012 | 2 |
| K251718 | ArTT Augments and Buttresses and Bone Screws | 2025 | 0 |
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
Recalls of this device
| Date | Class | Recall | Root cause | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2010 | Not classified | Z-2214-2010 | Packaging | The firm has determined that some of the packages could develop a breach of the seal in the sterile barrier pouches. |
| Apr 6, 2010 | Not classified | Z-2215-2010 | Packaging | The firm has determined that some of the packages could develop a breach of the seal in the sterile barrier pouches. |
| Apr 6, 2010 | Not classified | Z-2216-2010 | Packaging | The firm has determined that some of the packages could develop a breach of the seal in the sterile barrier pouches. |
| Apr 6, 2010 | Not classified | Z-2217-2010 | Packaging | The firm has determined that some of the packages could develop a breach of the seal in the sterile barrier pouches. |
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
How does its category compare?
All LPH devicesLPH Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · LPH
12in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · LPH
153in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · LPH
4in 2025
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · LPH
6,163in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code LPH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 10 | 116 | 16 | 509 |
| 2008 | 10 | 86 | 1 | 706 |
| 2009 | 3 | 112 | 2 | 1,156 |
| 2010 | 15 | 100 | 22 | 2,007 |
| 2011 | 16 | 110 | 26 | 3,320 |
| 2012 | 25 | 76 | 30 | 3,785 |
| 2013 | 11 | 135 | 9 | 5,002 |
| 2014 | 20 | 129 | 3 | 5,163 |
| 2015 | 18 | 111 | 1 | 5,830 |
| 2016 | 10 | 150 | 8 | 4,900 |
| 2017 | 12 | 121 | 14 | 5,312 |
| 2018 | 9 | 145 | 2 | 5,954 |
| 2019 | 22 | 164 | 8 | 7,130 |
| 2020 | 7 | 164 | 6 | 5,429 |
| 2021 | 8 | 410 | 4 | 5,978 |
| 2022 | 14 | 247 | 2 | 5,223 |
| 2023 | 10 | 111 | 2 | 5,345 |
| 2024 | 6 | 92 | 1 | 5,626 |
| 2025 | 12 | 153 | 4 | 6,163 |
| 2026 | 8 | 256 | 2 | — |
What is it indicated for?
Trabecular Metal Acetabular Augments are intended to provide the orthopedic surgeon with a prosthetic alternative to structural allograft in cases of segmental acetabular deficiencies.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K061067 · printed Nov 4, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K061067: Trabecular Metal Acetabular Augments.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K061067
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026