510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Palomar Q-Yag 5 ND:Yag Laser System

K061436510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 6, 2006196-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.4810

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc. · GEX Powered Laser Surgical Instrument

Cleared on Dec 6, 2006 after a 196-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 120 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Dec 6, 2006
Review
196 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GEX
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

120 later devices descend from it, 5 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2013: 2 descendants cleared2007: 1 descendant cleared2014: 4 descendants cleared2012: 2 descendants cleared2011: 1 descendant cleared2020: 8 descendants cleared2022: 9 descendants cleared2017: 8 descendants cleared2016: 11 descendants cleared2019: 5 descendants cleared2021: 9 descendants cleared2018: 5 descendants cleared2015: 2 descendants cleared2026: 14 descendants cleared2024: 14 descendants cleared2025: 20 descendants cleared2023: 5 descendants cleared20052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK061436 Palomar Q-Yag 5 ND:Yag Laser SystemPalomar Medical Technologies, Inc. · 2006
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 82 of its ownK113588 Spectra Laser SystemLutronic Corporation · 2012
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 57 of its ownK133254 Revlite Q-Switched ND:Yag Laser SystemCynosure, Inc. · 2014
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 49 of its ownK143105 Picosure WorkstationCynosure, Inc. · 2015
  5. Descendant · 3 generations on · 41 of its ownK153527 PicoWay Laser SystemSyneron Candela Corporation · 2016
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 35 of its ownK110370 Q-ClearLight Age, Inc. · 2011

Showing 5 of 120 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2007: 12011: 12012: 22013: 22014: 42015: 22016: 112017: 82018: 52019: 52020: 82021: 92022: 92023: 52024: 142025: 202026: 14
2007high 20 (2025) · low 0 (2008)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 120 · See all
  • K113588Spectra Laser SystemLutronic Corporation · 2012 · cites it directly82descendants
  • K133254Revlite Q-Switched ND:Yag Laser SystemCynosure, Inc. · 2014 · cites it directly57descendants
  • K143105Picosure WorkstationCynosure, Inc. · 2015 · 2 generations on49descendants
  • K153527PicoWay Laser SystemSyneron Candela Corporation · 2016 · 3 generations on41descendants
  • K110370Q-ClearLight Age, Inc. · 2011 · cites it directly35descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K061436Palomar Q-Yag 5 ND:Yag Laser SystemPalomar Medical Technologies, Inc.2006—
+1K113588Spectra Laser SystemLutronic Corporation2012—
+1K133254Revlite Q-Switched ND:Yag Laser SystemCynosure, Inc.2014—
+2K143105Picosure WorkstationCynosure, Inc.2015—
+3K153527PicoWay Laser SystemSyneron Candela Corporation2016—
+1K110370Q-ClearLight Age, Inc.2011—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200710
201110
201220
201320
201440
201520
2016110
201780
201850
201950
202080
202190
202290
202350
2024140
2025200
2026140
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K061436, 2006–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GEX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new GEX device

  1. #1 K222064 The Alma Soprano Titaniumscore 38.1 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—Continuum Electro-Optics, Inc. Medlite C3 Q-Switched Nd:YAG Laser
Named without a submission number
—
*—Palomar Q-YAG 5 Nd:YAG Laser System
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (120)

See all 120

5 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K113588Spectra Laser SystemLutronic Corporation201282
K133254Revlite Q-Switched ND:Yag Laser SystemCynosure, Inc.201457
K110370Q-ClearLight Age, Inc.201135
K130250Qyag Laser SystemPalomar Medical Technologies, Inc.20130
K071815Noveon, Model LS1100-01-0968Nomir Medical Technologies, Inc.20070

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K113588 (Lutronic Corporation, 2012) has gone furthest, with 82 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All GEX devices

GEX Powered Laser Surgical Instrument: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · GEX

83in 2025

2007: 732008: 1072009: 692010: 502011: 412012: 452013: 462014: 612015: 472016: 512017: 672018: 512019: 412020: 522021: 532022: 602023: 522024: 822025: 832026 (partial year): 57
2007high 107 (2008) · low 41 (2011)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GEX

90in 2025

2007: 79 days median2008: 86 days median2009: 100 days median2010: 96 days median2011: 83 days median2012: 118 days median2013: 144 days median2014: 147 days median2015: 112 days median2016: 114 days median2017: 90 days median2018: 78 days median2019: 88 days median2020: 90 days median2021: 123 days median2022: 152 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 90 days median2025: 90 days median2026 (partial year): 90 days median
2007high 152 (2022) · low 78 (2018)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · GEX

3in 2024

2007: 92008: 22010: 42011: 182012: 52013: 32014: 62016: 12017: 5, 1 Class I2018: 52019: 62020: 12023: 62024: 32026 (partial year): 2
2007high 18 (2011) · low 0 (2009)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GEX

2,720in 2025

2007: 3422008: 2322009: 2092010: 1,7112011: 3,0242012: 2,0002013: 2,2362014: 2,0362015: 2,0992016: 2,5852017: 2,9772018: 3,5252019: 2,7092020: 2,1832021: 3,4652022: 2,2882023: 2,3372024: 2,1872025: 2,720
2007high 3,525 (2018) · low 209 (2009)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GEX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200773799342
2008107862232
2009691000209
2010509641,711
20114183183,024
20124511852,000
20134614432,236
20146114762,036
20154711202,099
20165111412,585
201767905 (1)2,977
2018517853,525
2019418862,709
2020529012,183
20215312303,465
20226015202,288
2023528762,337
2024829032,187
2025839002,720
202657902—

What is it indicated for?

The Palomar Q-YAG 5TM Nd:YAG laser system is indicated at the 1064 nm wavelength for skin resurfacing with or without adjuvant preparation, dark ink tattoo removal (e.g., black ink), removal of pigmented lesions, including, but not limited to, lentigines, nevi, melasma, and caf6-au-lait, and the removal or lightening of hair. The 532 nm wavelength is indicated for the removal of red ink tattoos, treatment of vascular lesions, including facial and leg veins, telangiectasias, angiomas, hemangiomas, portwine stains, and most pigmented lesions (e.g., lentigines, ephlides).

The 1064/532 nm blended wavelength is indicated for tattoo removal.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K061436: Palomar Q-Yag 5 ND:Yag Laser System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K061436

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026