510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Led Prolux 770

K061695510(k) TraditionalCleared Sep 14, 200691-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.6070

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Peng Lim Enterprise Co., Ltd. · EBZ Activator, Ultraviolet, For Polymerization

Cleared on Sep 14, 2006 as substantially equivalent to K040618 (Apoza Enterprise Co., Ltd., 2004) after a 91-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 2002.

Decided
Sep 14, 2006
Review
91 days
Class
Class II
Product code
EBZ
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K023545 (2002). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 2 generations backK023545 Ultra-Lite 200E Light Cure UnitRolence Ent., Inc. · 2002
  2. 1 generation backK040618 Led TurboApoza Enterprise Co., Ltd. · 2004
  3. This deviceK061695 Led Prolux 770Peng Lim Enterprise Co., Ltd. · 2006
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K023545Ultra-Lite 200E Light Cure UnitRolence Ent., Inc.2002—
−1K040618Led TurboApoza Enterprise Co., Ltd.2004—
0 (this device)K061695Led Prolux 770Peng Lim Enterprise Co., Ltd.2006—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K061695, 2002–2006Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in EBZ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new EBZ device

  1. #1 K253131 Curing Light (M-Cure 6)score 12.7 · 5 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K040618Led Turbo
Summary page 1
…n name of device: CURING LIGHT * Predicate Device: Apoza Enterprise CO., Ltd LED Turbo 510K No - K040618 Pr Statement of Intended Use: This LED Prolux 770 is a visible curing un…
Apoza Enterprise Co., Ltd.2004—

Also cleared against K040618: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 4 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.5 years on median.
  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K040618.

How does its category compare?

All EBZ devices

EBZ Activator, Ultraviolet, For Polymerization: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · EBZ

4in 2025

2007: 102008: 52009: 42010: 12011: 32012: 12013: 32014: 32015: 42016: 42017: 82018: 22019: 52020: 52021: 12022: 52023: 32024: 12025: 42026 (partial year): 1
2007high 10 (2007) · low 1 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · EBZ

105in 2025

2007: 47 days median2008: 75 days median2009: 69 days median2011: 137 days median2013: 171 days median2014: 289 days median2015: 252 days median2016: 251 days median2017: 158 days median2019: 145 days median2020: 164 days median2022: 144 days median2023: 255 days median2025: 105 days median
2007high 289 (2014) · low 47 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · EBZ

1in 2022

2012: 12018: 12022: 1
2007high 1 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · EBZ

1in 2025

2007: 12008: 72009: 52010: 52011: 182012: 202013: 272014: 312015: 82016: 32017: 52018: 32020: 22021: 42022: 52023: 72024: 32025: 1
2007high 31 (2014) · low 0 (2019)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code EBZ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007104701
200857507
200946905
20101—05
20113137018
20121—120
20133171027
20143289031
2015425208
2016425103
2017815805
20182—13
2019514500
2020516402
20211—04
2022514415
2023325507
20241—03
2025410501
20261—0—

What is it indicated for?

This LED Prolux 770 is a visible curing unit designed for polymerization of light cured materials used by dental professionals.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K061695: Led Prolux 770.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K061695

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026