510(k) · Cleared
Recalled · Class II · 2012Angiodynamics Soft-VU and Mariner Hydrophilic Coated Angiographic Catheter
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
AngioDynamics, Inc. · DQO Catheter, Intravascular, Diagnostic
Cleared on Aug 24, 2006 after a 65-day review. FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate. 1 later device descends from it. It has been recalled 2 times.
- Decided
- Aug 24, 2006
- Review
- 65 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- DQO
- Recalls
- 2
- Predicates
- 0
1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.
- This deviceK061733 Angiodynamics Soft-VU and Mariner Hydrophilic Coated Angiographic…AngioDynamics, Inc. · 2006
- Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK073200 Gandras Intravascular Catheter, Models 5580, 5581 and 5582Vascular Solutions, Inc. · 2008
Most influential descendants
Showing 1 of 1 · See all- K073200Gandras Intravascular Catheter, Models 5580, 5581 and 5582Vascular Solutions, Inc. · 2008 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 (this device) | K061733 | Angiodynamics Soft-VU and Mariner Hydrophilic Coated Angiographic Catheter | AngioDynamics, Inc. | 2006 | — |
| +1 | K073200 | Gandras Intravascular Catheter, Models 5580, 5581 and 5582 | Vascular Solutions, Inc. | 2008 | — |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA 510(k) statement (indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in DQO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new DQO device
- #1 K254278 Arterial Pressure Monitoring Set/Trayscore 14.4 · 2 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against?
FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.
What descends from it? (1)
1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
| Number | Device | Decided | Descendants |
|---|---|---|---|
| K073200 | Gandras Intravascular Catheter, Models 5580, 5581 and 5582 | 2008 | 0 |
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
Recalls of this device
| Date | Class | Recall | Root cause | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2012 | Class II | Z-2180-2012 | Labeling mix-ups | AngioDynamics is recalling one lot of Soft-Vu Angiographic catheters because one of the catheter pouches within the outer box may be mislabeled. |
| Jun 7, 2011 | Not classified | Z-3259-2011 | Employee error | The lot of Soft-Vu Catheters was labeled 90 cm in length; however the product was cut to a 65 cm length. |
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- Of its descendants, K073200 (Vascular Solutions, Inc., 2008) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
How does its category compare?
All DQO devicesDQO Catheter, Intravascular, Diagnostic: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · DQO
2in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · DQO
148in 2024
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · DQO
1in 2023
Class I (11 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · DQO
656in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code DQO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 8 | 106 | 14 | 564 |
| 2008 | 3 | 80 | 4 | 726 |
| 2009 | 8 | 58 | 7 | 933 |
| 2010 | 7 | 137 | 11 | 556 |
| 2011 | 6 | 74 | 7 | 625 |
| 2012 | 15 | 94 | 2 | 532 |
| 2013 | 2 | — | 1 | 753 |
| 2014 | 3 | 109 | 0 | 601 |
| 2015 | 10 | 209 | 1 (1) | 628 |
| 2016 | 4 | 89 | 2 (1) | 614 |
| 2017 | 10 | 176 | 1 | 873 |
| 2018 | 10 | 234 | 2 | 777 |
| 2019 | 6 | 113 | 71 | 386 |
| 2020 | 3 | 30 | 4 (4) | 312 |
| 2021 | 1 | — | 0 | 338 |
| 2022 | 4 | 181 | 1 | 379 |
| 2023 | 4 | 73 | 1 (1) | 391 |
| 2024 | 4 | 148 | 0 | 511 |
| 2025 | 2 | — | 0 | 656 |
| 2026 | 3 | 85 | 24 (4) | — |
What is it indicated for?
AngioDynamics Angiographic Catheters are for use where angiographic diagnosis is indicated.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA 510(k) statement.
https://510kreport.com/device/K061733 · printed Nov 4, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K061733: Angiodynamics Soft-VU and Mariner Hydrophilic Coated Angiographic Catheter.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K061733
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026