510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Sta - Control LA 1+2

K061803510(k) TraditionalCleared Jul 28, 200631-day reviewClass II21 CFR 864.5425

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Diagnostica Stago, Inc. · GGC Control, Plasma, Abnormal

Cleared on Jul 28, 2006 as substantially equivalent to K952623 (Precision Biologicals, Inc., 1995) after a 31-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1995. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Jul 28, 2006
Review
31 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GGC
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K952623 (1995). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2014: 1 descendant clearedK952623 · Cryo Check Lupus Plasma · Precision Biologicals, Inc. · 19951995200020052010201520202025
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 1 descendant K952623 · Cryo Check Lupus Plasma · Precision Biologicals, Inc. · 19950
  1. Root · 1 generation backK952623 Cryo Check Lupus PlasmaPrecision Biologicals, Inc. · 1995
  2. This deviceK061803 Sta - Control LA 1+2Diagnostica Stago, Inc. · 2006
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK142132 Pool NormDiagnostics Stago S.A.S. · 2014

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K142132Pool NormDiagnostics Stago S.A.S. · 2014 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K952623Cryo Check Lupus PlasmaPrecision Biologicals, Inc.1995—
0 (this device)K061803Sta - Control LA 1+2Diagnostica Stago, Inc.2006—
+1K142132Pool NormDiagnostics Stago S.A.S.2014—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K061803, 1995–2014Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GGC? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K952623Cryo Check Lupus Plasma
Summary page 1
…on Name: Lupus Control Plasmas Classification Name: Plasma, Control, Normal & Abnormal c) Predicate Device Cryocheck Lupus Positive Control (K952623) manufactured by Precision Biologic, Inc. Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada. d) Intended Use/Device Description The STA…
Precision Biologicals, Inc.1995—

Also cleared against K952623: 1 other device →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K142132Pool NormDiagnostics Stago S.A.S.20140

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • Of its descendants, K142132 (Diagnostics Stago S.A.S., 2014) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K952623.

How does its category compare?

All GGC devices

GGC Control, Plasma, Abnormal: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · GGC

1in 2011

2007: 12010: 12011: 1
2007high 1 (2007) · low 0 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GGC

Too few GGC 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · GGC

No recall names GGC since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · GGC

1in 2021

2021: 1
2007high 1 (2021) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GGC, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—00
20080—00
20090—00
20101—00
20111—00
20120—00
20130—00
20140—00
20150—00
20160—00
20170—00
20180—00
20190—00
20200—00
20210—01
20220—00
20230—00
20240—00
20250—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The STA -R - Control LA 1+2 kit provides a lupus anticoagulant (LA) negative plasma

and a LA positive plasma. These plasmas are intended for the quality control of the tests

for LA detection carried out with the following tests:

STA® -Staclott dRVV Screen (#00339 & #00333)

STAR® -Staclot® dRVV

Confirm (#00334)

Staclot® LA (#00600, 00594)

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K061803: Sta - Control LA 1+2.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K061803

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026