510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Ceruloplasmin, Model 2055953

K062114510(k) TraditionalCleared Jan 31, 2007191-day reviewClass II21 CFR 866.5210

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Roche Diagnostics Corp. · CHN Immunochemical, Ceruloplasmin

Cleared on Jan 31, 2007 as substantially equivalent to K812486 (Dako Corp., 1981) after a 191-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1981. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Jan 31, 2007
Review
191 days
Class
Class II
Product code
CHN
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K812486 (1981). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2010: 1 descendant clearedK812486 · Immunogl. FRCT. of Rabbit Antiser.-Cerul · Dako Corp. · 198119801990200020102020
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 1 descendant K812486 · Immunogl. FRCT. of Rabbit Antiser.-Cerul · Dako Corp. · 19810
  1. Root · 1 generation backK812486 Immunogl. FRCT. of Rabbit Antiser.-CerulDako Corp. · 1981
  2. This deviceK062114 Ceruloplasmin, Model 2055953Roche Diagnostics Corp. · 2007
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK091741 Tina-Quant CeruloplasminRoche Diagnostics · 2010

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K091741Tina-Quant CeruloplasminRoche Diagnostics · 2010 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K812486Immunogl. FRCT. of Rabbit Antiser.-CerulDako Corp.1981—
0 (this device)K062114Ceruloplasmin, Model 2055953Roche Diagnostics Corp.2007—
+1K091741Tina-Quant CeruloplasminRoche Diagnostics2010—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201010
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K062114, 1981–2010Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in CHN? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K812486Immunogl. FRCT. of Rabbit Antiser.-Cerul
Summary page 2
…RU3, 0-666). Predicate We claim substantial equivalence to the DakoCytomation assay for Device Polyclonal Rabbit Anti-Human Ceruloplasmin cleared as K812486. Substantial The table below indicates the similarities between the COBAS INTEGRA equivalency - Ceruloplasmin test an…
Dako Corp.1981—

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K091741Tina-Quant CeruloplasminRoche Diagnostics20100

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • Of its descendants, K091741 (Roche Diagnostics, 2010) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All CHN devices

CHN Immunochemical, Ceruloplasmin: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2007, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · CHN

1in 2010

2007: 22010: 1
2007high 2 (2007) · low 0 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · CHN

Too few CHN 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · CHN

6in 2017

2017: 6
2007high 6 (2017) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · CHN

1in 2020

2017: 12020: 1
2007high 1 (2017) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code CHN, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20072—00
20080—00
20090—00
20101—00
20110—00
20120—00
20130—00
20140—00
20150—00
20160—00
20170—61
20180—00
20190—00
20200—01
20210—00
20220—00
20230—00
20240—00
20250—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

In vitro test for the quantitative immunological determination of ceruloplasmin in human serum and plasma on COBAS INTEGRA systems.

Measurements of Ceruloplasmin aid in the diagnosis of copper metabolism disorders.

In vitro test for the quantitative determination of ceruloplasmin in human serum and plasma on Roche/Hitachi cobas c systems.

Measurements of Ceruloplasmin aid in the diagnosis of copper metabolism disorders.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K062114: Ceruloplasmin, Model 2055953.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K062114

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026