510(k) · Cleared
ClearedOptimedica Laser Indirect Ophthalmoscope
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Optimedica Corporation · GEX Powered Laser Surgical Instrument
Cleared on Oct 19, 2006 as substantially equivalent to K924588 (Carl Zeiss, Inc., 1993) and 3 other predicates after a 70-day review. Its family tree reaches back 5 generations to 1989. 1 later device descends from it.
- Decided
- Oct 19, 2006
- Review
- 70 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- GEX
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 4
Its longest line of descent runs back 5 generations to K894841 (1989). 39 ancestors in all, the oldest K812219 (1981). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.
- Root · 5 generations backK894841 Iris Oculight (TM) SLIriderm Div. · 1989
- 4 generations backK960971 Oculight GLIriderm Div. · 1996
- 3 generations backK020374 Oculight SL/SLXIridex Corp · 2002
- 2 generations backK032357 Novus TTX Laser and Delivery Devices with AccessoriesLumenis, Inc. · 2003
- 1 generation backK052526 Novus 3000 Laser System and Delivery DevicesLumenis, Inc. · 2005
- This deviceK062336 Optimedica Laser Indirect OphthalmoscopeOptimedica Corporation · 2006
- Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK123056 Pascal Laser Indirect OphthalmoscopeTopcon Medical Laser Systems, Inc. (Tmls) · 2012
Most influential descendants
Showing 1 of 1 · See all- K123056Pascal Laser Indirect OphthalmoscopeTopcon Medical Laser Systems, Inc. (Tmls) · 2012 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −5 | K894841 | Iris Oculight (TM) SL | Iriderm Div. | 1989 | — |
| −4 | K960971 | Oculight GL | Iriderm Div. | 1996 | — |
| −3 | K020374 | Oculight SL/SLX | Iridex Corp | 2002 | — |
| −2 | K032357 | Novus TTX Laser and Delivery Devices with Accessories | Lumenis, Inc. | 2003 | — |
| −1 | K052526 | Novus 3000 Laser System and Delivery Devices | Lumenis, Inc. | 2005 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K062336 | Optimedica Laser Indirect Ophthalmoscope | Optimedica Corporation | 2006 | — |
| +1 | K123056 | Pascal Laser Indirect Ophthalmoscope | Topcon Medical Laser Systems, Inc. (Tmls) | 2012 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1981 | 1 | 0 |
| 1983 | 2 | 0 |
| 1984 | 2 | 0 |
| 1986 | 2 | 0 |
| 1989 | 5 | 0 |
| 1990 | 2 | 0 |
| 1991 | 4 | 0 |
| 1993 | 3 | 0 |
| 1994 | 3 | 0 |
| 1996 | 1 | 0 |
| 1997 | 1 | 0 |
| 1998 | 1 | 0 |
| 1999 | 2 | 0 |
| 2000 | 1 | 0 |
| 2002 | 3 | 0 |
| 2005 | 1 | 0 |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in GEX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new GEX device
- #1 K222064 The Alma Soprano Titaniumscore 38.1 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (4)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K924588 | Zeiss Laser Indirect OphthalmoscopeSummary page 1…ame or similar technological characteristics (including treatment and aiming wavelengths, spot size, working distance and indirect ophthalmoscope used) as the Zeiss LIO (K924588). The OptiMedica LIO is also substantially equivalent to the delivery devices included in 51 0(k)s K022181 (Novus VARIA and Deliv… | 1993 |
| * | K022181 | Novus Varia Ophthalmic Laser and Delivery Devices with AccessoriesSummary page 1…g distance and indirect ophthalmoscope used) as the Zeiss LIO (K924588). The OptiMedica LIO is also substantially equivalent to the delivery devices included in 51 0(k)s K022181 (Novus VARIA and Delivery Devices ) and K052526 (Novus 3000 and Delivery Devices ) by Lumenis and K991258 (Novus Verdi Delivery S… | 2002 |
| * | K052526 | Novus 3000 Laser System and Delivery DevicesSummary page 1…the Zeiss LIO (K924588). The OptiMedica LIO is also substantially equivalent to the delivery devices included in 51 0(k)s K022181 (Novus VARIA and Delivery Devices ) and K052526 (Novus 3000 and Delivery Devices ) by Lumenis and K991258 (Novus Verdi Delivery Systems) by Coherent. 5.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE… | 2005 |
| * | K991258 | Novus Verdi Delivery SystemsSummary page 1…ntially equivalent to the delivery devices included in 51 0(k)s K022181 (Novus VARIA and Delivery Devices ) and K052526 (Novus 3000 and Delivery Devices ) by Lumenis and K991258 (Novus Verdi Delivery Systems) by Coherent. 5.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVICE SUBJECT TO PREMARKET NOTIFICATION The OptiMedica… | 1999 |
What descends from it? (1)
1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
| Number | Device | Decided | Descendants |
|---|---|---|---|
| K123056 | Pascal Laser Indirect Ophthalmoscope | 2012 | 0 |
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 17 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.1 years on median.
- 1 of the 39 ancestors has a recall of any class.
- Of its descendants, K123056 (Topcon Medical Laser Systems, Inc. (Tmls), 2012) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
How does its category compare?
All GEX devicesGEX Powered Laser Surgical Instrument: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · GEX
83in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · GEX
90in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · GEX
3in 2024
Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · GEX
2,720in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code GEX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 73 | 79 | 9 | 342 |
| 2008 | 107 | 86 | 2 | 232 |
| 2009 | 69 | 100 | 0 | 209 |
| 2010 | 50 | 96 | 4 | 1,711 |
| 2011 | 41 | 83 | 18 | 3,024 |
| 2012 | 45 | 118 | 5 | 2,000 |
| 2013 | 46 | 144 | 3 | 2,236 |
| 2014 | 61 | 147 | 6 | 2,036 |
| 2015 | 47 | 112 | 0 | 2,099 |
| 2016 | 51 | 114 | 1 | 2,585 |
| 2017 | 67 | 90 | 5 (1) | 2,977 |
| 2018 | 51 | 78 | 5 | 3,525 |
| 2019 | 41 | 88 | 6 | 2,709 |
| 2020 | 52 | 90 | 1 | 2,183 |
| 2021 | 53 | 123 | 0 | 3,465 |
| 2022 | 60 | 152 | 0 | 2,288 |
| 2023 | 52 | 87 | 6 | 2,337 |
| 2024 | 82 | 90 | 3 | 2,187 |
| 2025 | 83 | 90 | 0 | 2,720 |
| 2026 | 57 | 90 | 2 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The OptiMedica LIO is indicated for the delivery of laser energy in eyes with retinal pathology. The OptiMedica LIO is indicated for use in the following ophthalmic treatments and conditions:
* Diabetic retinopathy (panretinal photocoagulation)
* Macular degeneration
* Peripheral neovascularization
* Retinal breaks
* Retinal detachments
* Retinal tears
* Lattice degeneration
* Pneumatic retinopexy reattachment procedures
* Segmental peripheral photocoagulation
* Segmental photocoagulation
* Cloudy vitreous cavities
* Pediatric retinal repairs (under general anesthesia)
* Delivery of laser energy through small pupils or to eyes with focal lens opacities
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K062336 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K062336: Optimedica Laser Indirect Ophthalmoscope.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K062336
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026