510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · 2008

I Review Software (Accessory to) Ilab Ultrasound Imaging System) VERSION1.0

K063493510(k) SpecialCleared Dec 21, 200631-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1550Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Boston Scientific Corp · IYN System, Imaging, Pulsed Doppler, Ultrasonic

Cleared on Dec 21, 2006 as substantially equivalent to K051679 (Boston Scientific Corp, 2005) after a 31-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1992. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Dec 21, 2006
Review
31 days
Class
Class II
Product code
IYN
Recalls
1
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K921750 (1992). 5 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 3 generations backK921750 Cvis Insight Iii SystemCardiovascular Imaging Systems, Inc. · 1992
  2. 2 generations backK980851 Galaxy Intravascular Ultrasound System, Model I5028Boston Scientific Corp · 1998
  3. 1 generation backK051679 Ilab Ultrasound Imaging SystemBoston Scientific Corp · 2005 · Recalled
  4. This deviceK063493 I Review Software (Accessory to) Ilab Ultrasound Imaging System)…Boston Scientific Corp · 2006
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K921750Cvis Insight Iii SystemCardiovascular Imaging Systems, Inc.1992—
−2K980851Galaxy Intravascular Ultrasound System, Model I5028Boston Scientific Corp1998—
−1K051679Ilab Ultrasound Imaging SystemBoston Scientific Corp20052
0 (this device)K063493I Review Software (Accessory to) Ilab Ultrasound Imaging System) VERSION1.0Boston Scientific Corp2006—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199320
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K063493, 1992–2006Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in IYN? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new IYN device

  1. #1 K240850 EPIQ Series Diagnostic Ultrasound Systems…score 32.1 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K051679Ilab Ultrasound Imaging System
Summary page 2
…ce Technology Characteristics and Comparison to Predicate Device The iRevieWTM Software is based on the software architecture of the previously cleared iLabrTM software (K051679) and allows for a standard graphical user interface between iLab and Review. Uniform and consistent applications increase efficie…
Boston Scientific Corp20052

Also cleared against K051679: 4 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
May 2, 2008Not classifiedZ-2006-2008Nonconforming Material/ComponentThe firm initiated a recall of a specific iReview" Software, Ver 1.0 Kit, which was released for distribution in a non-validated format.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 14 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 5.8 years on median.
  • 1 of the 5 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • 4 other devices also cite its predicate K051679.

How does its category compare?

All IYN devices

IYN System, Imaging, Pulsed Doppler, Ultrasonic: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · IYN

57in 2025

2007: 132008: 252009: 182010: 292011: 392012: 432013: 512014: 562015: 542016: 602017: 642018: 592019: 472020: 572021: 462022: 532023: 442024: 502025: 572026 (partial year): 44
2007high 64 (2017) · low 13 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · IYN

124in 2025

2007: 26 days median2008: 18 days median2009: 29 days median2010: 67 days median2011: 46 days median2012: 37 days median2013: 60 days median2014: 39 days median2015: 55 days median2016: 56 days median2017: 83 days median2018: 85 days median2019: 79 days median2020: 72 days median2021: 105 days median2022: 105 days median2023: 115 days median2024: 119 days median2025: 124 days median2026 (partial year): 107 days median
2007high 124 (2025) · low 18 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · IYN

10in 2025

2007: 162008: 122009: 82010: 102011: 82012: 32013: 82014: 22015: 32016: 22018: 72020: 42021: 82022: 102023: 42024: 12025: 102026 (partial year): 2, 1 Class I
2007high 16 (2007) · low 0 (2017)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · IYN

610in 2025

2007: 32008: 22009: 92010: 172011: 182012: 202013: 182014: 482015: 1162016: 1452017: 1462018: 852019: 592020: 672021: 2132022: 1862023: 2292024: 2662025: 610
2007high 610 (2025) · low 2 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code IYN, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071326163
20082518122
2009182989
201029671017
20113946818
20124337320
20135160818
20145639248
201554553116
201660562145
201764830146
20185985785
20194779059
20205772467
2021461058213
20225310510186
2023441154229
2024501191266
20255712410610
2026441072 (1)—

What is it indicated for?

The iLab TM Ultrasound Imaging System is intended for ultrasound examinations of intravascular pathology. Intravascular ultrasound is indicated in patients who are candidates for transluminal interventional procedures such as angioplasty and atherectomy.

The iReview Software accessory does not change the iLab indications for use.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K063493: I Review Software (Accessory to) Ilab Ultrasound Imaging System) VERSION1.0.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K063493

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026