510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Titanium Repicci II Unicondylar Femoral Knee Components Cocr Repicci II Unicondylar Knee

K063515510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 2, 200773-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3530

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Biomet Manufacturing, Inc. · HRY Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer

Cleared on Feb 2, 2007 as substantially equivalent to K041466 (Biomet Manufacturing Corp, 2004) and 3 other predicates after a 73-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1997. 2 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Feb 2, 2007
Review
73 days
Class
Class II
Product code
HRY
Recalls
None
Predicates
4

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K971938 (1997). 4 ancestors in all. 2 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2004: 1 other ancestor1999: 1 other ancestor2021: 1 descendant cleared2026: 1 descendant clearedK971938 · Repicci II Unicondylar Knee · Biomet, Inc. · 1997 · recalledK020264 · Repicci II Unicondylar Knee System · Biomet Orthopedics, Inc. · 20021995200020052010201520202025
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 2 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 1 descendant2 generations forward: 1 descendant K020264 · Repicci II Unicondylar Knee System · Biomet Orthopedics, Inc. · 2002K971938 · Repicci II Unicondylar Knee · Biomet, Inc. · 1997 · recalled0
  1. Root · 2 generations backK971938 Repicci II Unicondylar KneeBiomet, Inc. · 1997 · Recalled
  2. 1 generation backK020264 Repicci II Unicondylar Knee SystemBiomet Orthopedics, Inc. · 2002
  3. This deviceK063515 Titanium Repicci II Unicondylar Femoral Knee Components Cocr Repicci…Biomet Manufacturing, Inc. · 2007
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK203341 ACS LD Uni FB Knee SystemImplantcast GmbH · 2021
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK260037 implantcast Packaging System UpdateImplantcast GmbH · 2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 2 of 2 · See all
  • K203341ACS LD Uni FB Knee SystemImplantcast GmbH · 2021 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K260037implantcast Packaging System UpdateImplantcast GmbH · 2026 · 2 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K971938Repicci II Unicondylar KneeBiomet, Inc.19971
−1K020264Repicci II Unicondylar Knee SystemBiomet Orthopedics, Inc.2002—
0 (this device)K063515Titanium Repicci II Unicondylar Femoral Knee Components Cocr Repicci II…Biomet Manufacturing, Inc.2007—
+1K203341ACS LD Uni FB Knee SystemImplantcast GmbH2021—
+2K260037implantcast Packaging System UpdateImplantcast GmbH2026—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199910
200410

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
202110
202610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K063515, 1997–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HRY? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new HRY device

  1. #1 K193549 SIGMA High Performance (HP) Partial Knee Systemscore 0.4 · 5 generations · no Class I recall
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (4)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K041466Titanium Femoral Knee Components (Maxim and Agc)
Summary page 1
…30) Legally Marketed Devices To Which Substantial Equivalence Is Claimed: Titanium Femoral Knee Components (Maxim® and AGC®) K041466 Biomet, Inc. Repicci II® Unicondylar Knee System K020264 Biomet, Inc. Titanium Femo…
Biomet Manufacturing Corp2004—
*K020264Repicci II Unicondylar Knee System
Summary page 1
…Titanium Femoral Knee Components (Maxim® and AGC®) K041466 Biomet, Inc. Repicci II® Unicondylar Knee System K020264 Biomet, Inc. Titanium Femoral Component K(981996 Biomnet, Inc. Repicci II®…
Biomet Orthopedics, Inc.2002—
*K981996Titanium Femoral Component
Summary page 1
…K041466 Biomet, Inc. Repicci II® Unicondylar Knee System K020264 Biomet, Inc. Titanium Femoral Component K(981996 Biomnet, Inc. Repicci II® Unicondylar Knee K(971938 Biomnet, Inc. Device Description: T…
Biomet, Inc.1999—
*K971938Repicci II Unicondylar Knee
Summary page 1
…K020264 Biomet, Inc. Titanium Femoral Component K(981996 Biomnet, Inc. Repicci II® Unicondylar Knee K(971938 Biomnet, Inc. Device Description: The Titanium Repicci II® Unicondylar Femoral Knee Components are medial or lateral un…
Biomet, Inc.19971

What descends from it? (2)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K203341ACS LD Uni FB Knee SystemImplantcast GmbH20211

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 10 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 5.0 years on median.
  • 1 of the 4 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K203341 (Implantcast GmbH, 2021) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.

How does its category compare?

All HRY devices

HRY Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2007, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · HRY

1in 2020

2007: 32008: 32010: 12011: 12012: 12013: 12014: 12015: 12016: 12019: 12020: 1
2007high 3 (2007) · low 0 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HRY

138in 2008

2007: 92 days median2008: 138 days median
2007high 138 (2008) · low 92 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · HRY

3in 2022

2007: 12008: 12011: 12013: 12016: 12020: 12021: 12022: 3
2007high 3 (2022) · low 0 (2009)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HRY

290in 2025

2007: 2632008: 2852009: 2492010: 1802011: 1552012: 1372013: 3832014: 3052015: 3452016: 3432017: 4022018: 6132019: 3672020: 1,0542021: 1,2182022: 8402023: 3962024: 4302025: 290
2007high 1,218 (2021) · low 137 (2012)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HRY, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20073921263
200831381285
20090—0249
20101—0180
20111—1155
20121—0137
20131—1383
20141—0305
20151—0345
20161—1343
20170—0402
20180—0613
20191—0367
20201—11,054
20210—11,218
20220—3840
20230—0396
20240—0430
20250—0290
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Titanium Repicci II® Unicondylar Femoral Knee Components and CoCr Repicci II® Unicondylar Knee are indicated for partial replacement of the articulating surfaces of the knee when only one side of the joint is affected due to compartmental primary degenerative or post-traumatic degenerative disease, previous tibial condyle or plateau fractures, deformity or revision of previous arthroplasty.

These devices are single-use implants intended for implantation with bone cement.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K063515: Titanium Repicci II Unicondylar Femoral Knee Components Cocr Repicci II Unicondylar Knee.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K063515

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026