510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Ascent Dental Cleanser

K070070510(k) TraditionalCleared May 25, 2007137-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.3260

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

CAO Group, Inc. · LBH Varnish, Cavity

Cleared on May 25, 2007 as substantially equivalent to K021131 (Centrix, Inc., 2002) after a 137-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 2002.

Decided
May 25, 2007
Review
137 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LBH
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K021131 (2002). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

K021131 · Chloraprep · Centrix, Inc. · 200220002002200420062008
K021131 · Chloraprep · Centrix, Inc. · 20020
  1. Root · 1 generation backK021131 ChloraprepCentrix, Inc. · 2002
  2. This deviceK070070 Ascent Dental CleanserCAO Group, Inc. · 2007
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K021131ChloraprepCentrix, Inc.2002—
0 (this device)K070070Ascent Dental CleanserCAO Group, Inc.2007—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K070070, 2002–2007Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LBH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LBH device

  1. #1 K262243 Profisil Freescore 12.9 · 4 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K021131Chloraprep
Summary page 1
…FR 872.3260, Product Code: LBH) Legally Marketed Predicate Devices for Substantial Equivalence: · Chloraprep, Manufactured by Centrix, Inc. 510(k) Number: K021131 Rationale for Substantial Equivalence: The aforementioned device shares similarities for the purpose of cleansing caviti…
Centrix, Inc.2002—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.

How does its category compare?

All LBH devices

LBH Varnish, Cavity: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2007, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · LBH

4in 2025

2007: 82008: 62009: 42010: 72011: 32012: 42013: 62014: 62015: 22016: 22019: 22020: 52022: 12023: 32024: 32025: 42026 (partial year): 5
2007high 8 (2007) · low 0 (2017)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LBH

223in 2025

2007: 69 days median2008: 79 days median2009: 69 days median2010: 107 days median2011: 72 days median2012: 83 days median2013: 160 days median2014: 204 days median2020: 256 days median2023: 167 days median2024: 237 days median2025: 223 days median2026 (partial year): 64 days median
2007high 256 (2020) · low 69 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LBH

1in 2019

2014: 32018: 22019: 1
2007high 3 (2014) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LBH

7in 2025

2007: 42008: 32009: 52010: 72011: 82012: 72013: 272014: 402015: 142016: 122017: 112018: 132019: 92020: 102021: 152022: 72023: 82024: 62025: 7
2007high 40 (2014) · low 3 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LBH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200786904
200867903
200946905
2010710707
201137208
201248307
20136160027
20146204340
20152—014
20162—012
20170—011
20180—213
20192—19
20205256010
20210—015
20221—07
2023316708
2024323706
2025422307
20265640—

What is it indicated for?

Ascent Dental Cleanser is indicated for:

The cleansing and disinfecting only of tooth cavity preparations in conjunction with dental restorative procedures

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K070070: Ascent Dental Cleanser.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K070070

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026