510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2022

Fresenius Naturalyte Liquid Acid Concentrate, 9000, 6000 and 4000 Series

K070177510(k) SpecialCleared Mar 29, 200770-day reviewClass II21 CFR 876.5820Recalls 35

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Fresenius Medical Care North America · KPO Dialysate Concentrate For Hemodialysis (Liquid Or Powder)

Cleared on Mar 29, 2007 as substantially equivalent to K810925 (Erika, Inc., 1981) and 2 other predicates after a 70-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1981. It has been recalled 35 times.

Decided
Mar 29, 2007
Review
70 days
Class
Class II
Product code
KPO
Recalls
35
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K810925 (1981). 3 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 1985: 1 other ancestor1982: 1 other ancestorK810925 · Naturalyte Bicarbonate Dialysate Concen. · Erika, Inc. · 1981198019851990199520002005
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 2 other ancestors K810925 · Naturalyte Bicarbonate Dialysate Concen. · Erika, Inc. · 19810
  1. Root · 1 generation backK810925 Naturalyte Bicarbonate Dialysate Concen.Erika, Inc. · 1981
  2. This deviceK070177 Fresenius Naturalyte Liquid Acid Concentrate, 9000, 6000 and 4000…Fresenius Medical Care North America · 2007
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K810925Naturalyte Bicarbonate Dialysate Concen.Erika, Inc.1981—
0 (this device)K070177Fresenius Naturalyte Liquid Acid Concentrate, 9000, 6000 and 4000 SeriesFresenius Medical Care North America2007—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198210
198510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K070177, 1981–2007Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in KPO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new KPO device

  1. #1 K233159 pureFLOW 402, pureFLOW 400, pureFLOW 406…score 14.5 · 8 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K810925Naturalyte Bicarbonate Dialysate Concen.
Summary page 2
…. Predicate Device Name: The Fresenius Naturalyte® Liquid Acid Concentrate is a modified version of the Fresenius Naturalyte Liquid Acid Concentrate1996): * #K810925 (4/23/1981)- 9000 series * #K823115 (12/3/1982) - 4000 series * #K852310 (7/26/1985) - 6000 series D. Device Description/ind…
Erika, Inc.1981—
*K823115Naturalyte Bicarbonate Dialysate 4400
Summary page 2
…enius Naturalyte® Liquid Acid Concentrate is a modified version of the Fresenius Naturalyte Liquid Acid Concentrate1996): * #K810925 (4/23/1981)- 9000 series * #K823115 (12/3/1982) - 4000 series * #K852310 (7/26/1985) - 6000 series D. Device Description/indications for Use: The intended us…
Erika, Inc.1982—
*K852310Naturalyte Bicarbonate Concentrate-Dry Pack
Summary page 2
…te is a modified version of the Fresenius Naturalyte Liquid Acid Concentrate1996): * #K810925 (4/23/1981)- 9000 series * #K823115 (12/3/1982) - 4000 series * #K852310 (7/26/1985) - 6000 series D. Device Description/indications for Use: The intended use for the modified device is equivalent…
Erika, Inc.1985—

Also cleared against K810925: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Oct 4, 2022Class IIZ-0181-2023Error in labelingThe "Nominal Chemical Composition" section of the label incorrectly lists 5.62g/L KCL (potassium chloride). 5.62g/L actually corresponds to the CaCl (calcium chloride) content. The product remains potassium free.
Dec 17, 2020Class IIZ-0942-2021Packaging change controlBottles Missing Product Label
Nov 23, 2020Class IIZ-0832-2021Under Investigation by firmThe deviation in conductivity for sodium level exceeds 0.6mS/cm from the theoretical conductivity (TCD) or approximately 6mEq/L of sodium from prescriptions that was previously communicated. Calcium concentration is below manufacturing…
Nov 23, 2020Class IIZ-0834-2021Under Investigation by firmThe deviation in conductivity for sodium level exceeds 0.6mS/cm from the theoretical conductivity (TCD) or approximately 6mEq/L of sodium from prescriptions that was previously communicated. Calcium concentration is below manufacturing…
Nov 23, 2020Class IIZ-0836-2021Under Investigation by firmThe deviation in conductivity for sodium level exceeds 0.6mS/cm from the theoretical conductivity (TCD) or approximately 6mEq/L of sodium from prescriptions that was previously communicated. Calcium concentration is below manufacturing…
Nov 23, 2020Class IIZ-0838-2021Under Investigation by firmThe deviation in conductivity for sodium level exceeds 0.6mS/cm from the theoretical conductivity (TCD) or approximately 6mEq/L of sodium from prescriptions that was previously communicated. Calcium concentration is below manufacturing…
Nov 23, 2020Class IIZ-0833-2021Under Investigation by firmThe deviation in conductivity for sodium level exceeds 0.6mS/cm from the theoretical conductivity (TCD) or approximately 6mEq/L of sodium from prescriptions that was previously communicated. Calcium concentration is below manufacturing…
Nov 23, 2020Class IIZ-0841-2021Under Investigation by firmThe deviation in conductivity for sodium level exceeds 0.6mS/cm from the theoretical conductivity (TCD) or approximately 6mEq/L of sodium from prescriptions that was previously communicated. Calcium concentration is below manufacturing…
Nov 23, 2020Class IIZ-0835-2021Under Investigation by firmThe deviation in conductivity for sodium level exceeds 0.6mS/cm from the theoretical conductivity (TCD) or approximately 6mEq/L of sodium from prescriptions that was previously communicated. Calcium concentration is below manufacturing…
Nov 23, 2020Class IIZ-0837-2021Under Investigation by firmThe deviation in conductivity for sodium level exceeds 0.6mS/cm from the theoretical conductivity (TCD) or approximately 6mEq/L of sodium from prescriptions that was previously communicated. Calcium concentration is below manufacturing…
Nov 23, 2020Class IIZ-0840-2021Under Investigation by firmThe deviation in conductivity for sodium level exceeds 0.6mS/cm from the theoretical conductivity (TCD) or approximately 6mEq/L of sodium from prescriptions that was previously communicated. Calcium concentration is below manufacturing…
Nov 23, 2020Class IIZ-0831-2021Under Investigation by firmThe deviation in conductivity for sodium level exceeds 0.6mS/cm from the theoretical conductivity (TCD) or approximately 6mEq/L of sodium from prescriptions that was previously communicated. Calcium concentration is below manufacturing…
Nov 23, 2020Class IIZ-0839-2021Under Investigation by firmThe deviation in conductivity for sodium level exceeds 0.6mS/cm from the theoretical conductivity (TCD) or approximately 6mEq/L of sodium from prescriptions that was previously communicated. Calcium concentration is below manufacturing…
Nov 7, 2020Class IIZ-0811-2021Under Investigation by firmThe sodium and/or calcium levels in these concentrates were below the manufacturing specifications.
Nov 7, 2020Class IIZ-0812-2021Under Investigation by firmThe sodium and/or calcium levels in these concentrates were below the manufacturing specifications.
Nov 7, 2020Class IIZ-0813-2021Under Investigation by firmThe sodium and/or calcium levels in these concentrates were below the manufacturing specifications.
Nov 7, 2020Class IIZ-0815-2021Under Investigation by firmThe sodium and/or calcium levels in these concentrates were below the manufacturing specifications.
Nov 7, 2020Class IIZ-0816-2021Under Investigation by firmThe sodium and/or calcium levels in these concentrates were below the manufacturing specifications.
Nov 7, 2020Class IIZ-0817-2021Under Investigation by firmThe sodium and/or calcium levels in these concentrates were below the manufacturing specifications.
Nov 7, 2020Class IIZ-0818-2021Under Investigation by firmThe sodium and/or calcium levels in these concentrates were below the manufacturing specifications.
Nov 7, 2020Class IIZ-0820-2021Under Investigation by firmThe sodium and/or calcium levels in these concentrates were below the manufacturing specifications.
Nov 7, 2020Class IIZ-0821-2021Under Investigation by firmThe sodium and/or calcium levels in these concentrates were below the manufacturing specifications.
Nov 7, 2020Class IIZ-0823-2021Under Investigation by firmThe sodium and/or calcium levels in these concentrates were below the manufacturing specifications.
Nov 7, 2020Class IIZ-0825-2021Under Investigation by firmThe sodium and/or calcium levels in these concentrates were below the manufacturing specifications.
Nov 7, 2020Class IIZ-0826-2021Under Investigation by firmThe sodium and/or calcium levels in these concentrates were below the manufacturing specifications.
Nov 7, 2020Class IIZ-0827-2021Under Investigation by firmThe sodium and/or calcium levels in these concentrates were below the manufacturing specifications.
Nov 7, 2020Class IIZ-0814-2021Under Investigation by firmThe sodium and/or calcium levels in these concentrates were below the manufacturing specifications.
Nov 7, 2020Class IIZ-0819-2021Under Investigation by firmThe sodium and/or calcium levels in these concentrates were below the manufacturing specifications.
Nov 7, 2020Class IIZ-0822-2021Under Investigation by firmThe sodium and/or calcium levels in these concentrates were below the manufacturing specifications.
Nov 7, 2020Class IIZ-0824-2021Under Investigation by firmThe sodium and/or calcium levels in these concentrates were below the manufacturing specifications.
Nov 7, 2020Class IIZ-0828-2021Under Investigation by firmThe sodium and/or calcium levels in these concentrates were below the manufacturing specifications.
Nov 7, 2020Class IIZ-0829-2021Under Investigation by firmThe sodium and/or calcium levels in these concentrates were below the manufacturing specifications.
May 2, 2018Class IIZ-2110-2018Employee errorThe bottles are mislabeled with an incorrect part number.
Sep 29, 2017Class IIZ-1010-2018Release of Material/Component prior to receiving test resultsThe label specifies the potassium concentration is 2.0 mEq/L. Some of the product in the affected lot was found to have a potassium concentration of 2.25 mEq/L.
Jan 18, 2016Class IIZ-0887-2016Error in labelingOn the label calcium (Ca) listed in the right upper corner of the label (red background) incorrectly indicates the product contains 2.5 mEq/L Ca. The concentration indicated in the list of constituents represents the actual calcium…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • None of the 3 ancestors has a recall.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K810925.

How does its category compare?

All KPO devices

KPO Dialysate Concentrate For Hemodialysis (Liquid Or Powder): FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2007, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · KPO

2in 2025

2007: 22008: 22009: 12011: 12012: 22013: 12014: 22015: 12016: 12017: 32018: 22020: 52021: 12022: 22023: 32024: 32025: 22026 (partial year): 2
2007high 5 (2020) · low 0 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · KPO

112in 2024

2017: 192 days median2020: 270 days median2023: 263 days median2024: 112 days median
2007high 270 (2020) · low 112 (2024)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · KPO

6in 2025

2007: 52008: 22009: 12011: 22012: 102015: 32016: 12017: 12018: 112019: 12020: 312022: 22024: 12025: 62026 (partial year): 9
2007high 31 (2020) · low 0 (2010)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · KPO

95in 2025

2007: 52008: 82009: 32010: 1072011: 2232012: 702013: 3,8972014: 15,9162015: 8,3402016: 2402017: 802018: 972019: 792020: 2442021: 632022: 252023: 592024: 2592025: 95
2007high 15,916 (2014) · low 3 (2009)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code KPO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20072—55
20082—28
20091—13
20100—0107
20111—2223
20122—1070
20131—03,897
20142—015,916
20151—38,340
20161—1240
20173192180
20182—1197
20190—179
2020527031244
20211—063
20222—225
20233263059
202431121259
20252—695
20262—9—

What is it indicated for?

Acid Concentrate for Bicarbonate Dialysis

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K070177: Fresenius Naturalyte Liquid Acid Concentrate, 9000, 6000 and 4000 Series.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K070177

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026