510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

IP System, Oculab IP, Optomize IP, Retasure IP

K071299510(k) TraditionalCleared Aug 31, 2007114-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.2050

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Digital Healthcare, Ltd. · NFJ System, Image Management, Ophthalmic

Cleared on Aug 31, 2007 after a 114-day review. The FDA summary names no predicate by number. 31 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Aug 31, 2007
Review
114 days
Class
Class II
Product code
NFJ
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

31 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2009: 2 descendants cleared2012: 1 descendant cleared2013: 3 descendants cleared2011: 1 descendant cleared2022: 3 descendants cleared2014: 1 descendant cleared2018: 5 descendants cleared2020: 3 descendants cleared2017: 2 descendants cleared2015: 3 descendants cleared2023: 3 descendants cleared2024: 1 descendant cleared2021: 1 descendant cleared2026: 2 descendants cleared20052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK071299 IP System, Oculab IP, Optomize IP, Retasure IPDigital Healthcare, Ltd. · 2007
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 29 of its ownK093313 SynergyTopcon Medical Systems, Inc. · 2009
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 25 of its ownK122938 Forum Forum Archive Forum Archive & Viewer Forum Assist MatchCarl Zeiss Meditec, AG · 2012 · Recalled
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 9 of its ownK132667 Synergy OdmTopcon Medical Systems, Inc. · 2013
  5. Descendant · 3 generations on · 8 of its ownK151952 Synergy ODMTopcon Medical Systems, Inc. · 2015
  6. Descendant · 4 generations on · 4 of its ownK182376 HarmonyTopcon Medical Systems, Inc. · 2018

Showing 5 of 31 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2009: 22011: 12012: 12013: 32014: 12015: 32017: 22018: 52020: 32021: 12022: 32023: 32024: 12026: 2
2009high 5 (2018) · low 0 (2010)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 31 · See all
  • K093313SynergyTopcon Medical Systems, Inc. · 2009 · cites it directly29descendants
  • K122938Forum Forum Archive Forum Archive & Viewer Forum Assist MatchCarl Zeiss Meditec, AG · 2012 · 2 generations on25descendants
  • K132667Synergy OdmTopcon Medical Systems, Inc. · 2013 · 2 generations on9descendants
  • K151952Synergy ODMTopcon Medical Systems, Inc. · 2015 · 3 generations on8descendants
  • K182376HarmonyTopcon Medical Systems, Inc. · 2018 · 4 generations on4descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K071299IP System, Oculab IP, Optomize IP, Retasure IPDigital Healthcare, Ltd.2007—
+1K093313SynergyTopcon Medical Systems, Inc.2009—
+2K122938Forum Forum Archive Forum Archive & Viewer Forum Assist MatchCarl Zeiss Meditec, AG20121
+2K132667Synergy OdmTopcon Medical Systems, Inc.2013—
+3K151952Synergy ODMTopcon Medical Systems, Inc.2015—
+4K182376HarmonyTopcon Medical Systems, Inc.2018—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200920
201110
201210
201330
201410
201530
201720
201850
202030
202110
202230
202330
202410
202620
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K071299, 2007–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in NFJ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new NFJ device

  1. #1 K260694 Zeiss Clinic 360score 15.0 · 12 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

The FDA summary names no predicate by number.

What descends from it? (31)

See all 31

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K093313SynergyTopcon Medical Systems, Inc.200929
K090266MatchedflickerEyeic Corporation20090

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K093313 (Topcon Medical Systems, Inc., 2009) has gone furthest, with 29 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All NFJ devices

NFJ System, Image Management, Ophthalmic: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2007, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · NFJ

2in 2024

2007: 12008: 12009: 42011: 22012: 22013: 52014: 22015: 32017: 52018: 72019: 22020: 52021: 22022: 32023: 42024: 22026 (partial year): 2
2007high 7 (2018) · low 0 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · NFJ

85in 2023

2009: 67 days median2013: 73 days median2015: 87 days median2017: 175 days median2018: 84 days median2020: 116 days median2022: 284 days median2023: 85 days median
2007high 284 (2022) · low 67 (2009)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · NFJ

1in 2024

2010: 22015: 12020: 22022: 12024: 1
2007high 2 (2010) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · NFJ

2in 2022

2013: 62014: 12015: 22016: 292017: 42019: 22021: 12022: 2
2007high 29 (2016) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code NFJ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—00
20081—00
200946700
20100—20
20112—00
20122—00
201357306
20142—01
201538712
20160—029
2017517504
201878400
20192—02
2020511620
20212—01
2022328412
202348500
20242—10
20250—00
20262—0—

What is it indicated for?

The iP system is used by health professionals to capture, store, encode, encrypt, transmit, decrypt, decode, display, process, spatially calibrate, assess, grade and report on images and data that are captured on a range of approved medical devices that include but are not limited to: A. Mydriatic Fundus Cameras B. Non Mydriatic Fundus Cameras C. Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopes D. Optical Coherence Tomography Instruments E. Bio Microscopes (Slit Lamps) F.…

Read the full statement (118 words)

The iP system is used by health professionals to capture, store, encode, encrypt, transmit, decrypt, decode, display, process, spatially calibrate, assess, grade and report on images and data that are captured on a range of approved medical devices that include but are not limited to:

A. Mydriatic Fundus Cameras

B. Non Mydriatic Fundus Cameras

C. Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopes

D. Optical Coherence Tomography Instruments

E. Bio Microscopes (Slit Lamps)

F. Non Radiometric Ultrasound devices

G. Video image sources

H. TWAIN compliant imaging sources

I. Compliant data sources placed in network accessible folders and directories

J. Images of known format from digital cameras and scanners

K. Electronic information complying to accepted DICOM formats

L. Other devices connected in proprietary formats

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K071299: IP System, Oculab IP, Optomize IP, Retasure IP.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K071299

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026