510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2017

Mhi-TM2000 Linear Accelerator System

K072047510(k) TraditionalCleared Aug 29, 200735-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.5050Recalls 7

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. · IYE Accelerator, Linear, Medical

Cleared on Aug 29, 2007 after a 35-day review. FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known. 2 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 7 times.

Decided
Aug 29, 2007
Review
35 days
Class
Class II
Product code
IYE
Recalls
7
Predicates
0

2 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2012: 1 descendant cleared2015: 1 descendant cleared20052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK072047 Mhi-TM2000 Linear Accelerator SystemMitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. · 2007
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK122450 Mhi-TM2000 Linear Accelerator System Vero ImavisMitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. · 2012 · Recalled
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK152867 MHI-TM2000 Linear Accelerator System, VERO, ImavisMitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. · 2015 · Recalled

Most influential descendants

Showing 2 of 2 · See all
  • K122450Mhi-TM2000 Linear Accelerator System Vero ImavisMitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. · 2012 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K152867MHI-TM2000 Linear Accelerator System, VERO, ImavisMitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. · 2015 · 2 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K072047Mhi-TM2000 Linear Accelerator SystemMitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.2007—
+1K122450Mhi-TM2000 Linear Accelerator System Vero ImavisMitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.20127
+2K152867MHI-TM2000 Linear Accelerator System, VERO, ImavisMitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.20153

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201210
201510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K072047, 2007–2015Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in IYE? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new IYE device

  1. #1 K252977 Halcyon, Ethos Radiotherapy System (5.0)score 18.8 · 18 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known.

What descends from it? (2)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K122450Mhi-TM2000 Linear Accelerator System Vero ImavisMitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.20121

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Dec 8, 2017Class IIZ-1585-2018Device DesignDue to a system controller software anomaly, the patient positioning deviation correction may not be applied and may result in the wrong part of the patient being irradiated.
Mar 7, 2016Class IIZ-1308-2016Software designIn rare cases the VERO/MHI-TM2000 Operator Console could set an incorrect Gantry angle for the first beam of an IMRT treatment if certain specific conditions are met. If Gantry angle for the first beam of IMRT is incorrectly set and if…
Dec 15, 2015Class IIZ-1244-2016Software designDue to Operator Console software anomaly, a change in treatment completion status of the last patient of the day may be altered from "Completed (or Discontinued)" to "Untreated" under specific conditions.
Apr 17, 2015Class IIZ-1574-2015Software design (manufacturing process)The operator console allows users to deliver therapeutic radiation to patients even though a specific communication error relevant to imaging conditions has occurred. In addition, the treatment record (the delivered radiation record)…
Dec 2, 2014Class IIZ-0821-2015Software designSoftware Anomaly. The VERO MHI-TM2000 Operator Console may provide Patient Positioning System (ExacTrac) with Image Angle Information Used for the 1st Port Image, for a subsequent port image fusion. As the result, ExacTrac may display a…
Jul 5, 2014Class IIZ-2653-2014Software designSoftware Anomaly: If a user changes the calendar setting from Workday to Holiday or vice versa, that would erroneously change the status of treatment/fractions, which are completed and to become Treated (completed) status on the exact day…
Jun 21, 2013Class IIZ-1931-2013Software Design ChangeSoftware anomaly: Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. became aware of a potential safety issue associated with the VERO (TM) Linear Accelerator System. The VERO (TM) may save treatment delivery record into wrong location under certain…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K122450 (Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd., 2012) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.

How does its category compare?

All IYE devices

IYE Accelerator, Linear, Medical: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2007, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · IYE

12in 2025

2007: 232008: 142009: 202010: 232011: 112012: 282013: 182014: 202015: 202016: 212017: 232018: 212019: 192020: 202021: 192022: 122023: 182024: 92025: 122026 (partial year): 14
2007high 28 (2012) · low 9 (2024)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · IYE

170in 2025

2007: 44 days median2008: 69 days median2009: 63 days median2010: 74 days median2011: 94 days median2012: 106 days median2013: 88 days median2014: 100 days median2015: 108 days median2016: 97 days median2017: 94 days median2018: 58 days median2019: 83 days median2020: 67 days median2021: 86 days median2022: 172 days median2023: 129 days median2024: 239 days median2025: 170 days median2026 (partial year): 120 days median
2007high 239 (2024) · low 44 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · IYE

1in 2025

2007: 782008: 492009: 222010: 272011: 732012: 202013: 112014: 142015: 82016: 72017: 72018: 72019: 22020: 42021: 52022: 32023: 72024: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 4
2007high 78 (2007) · low 1 (2024)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · IYE

101in 2025

2007: 1552008: 1142009: 1742010: 2462011: 2802012: 1282013: 962014: 1242015: 1002016: 972017: 1252018: 852019: 912020: 742021: 682022: 662023: 1282024: 812025: 101
2007high 280 (2011) · low 66 (2022)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code IYE, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007234478155
2008146949114
2009206322174
2010237427246
2011119473280
20122810620128
201318881196
20142010014124
2015201088100
20162197797
201723947125
20182158785
20191983291
20202067474
20211986568
202212172366
2023181297128
20249239181
2025121701101
2026141204—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K072047: Mhi-TM2000 Linear Accelerator System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K072047

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026