510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Controlled Delivery for Osteoplasty (Cdo System) and Graft Preparation System

K072330510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 6, 2007108-day reviewClass II21 CFR 880.5860

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Biomet, Inc. · FMF Syringe, Piston

Cleared on Dec 6, 2007 as substantially equivalent to K030208 (Orthovita, Inc., 2003) and 2 other predicates after a 108-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 2001. 47 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Dec 6, 2007
Review
108 days
Class
Class II
Product code
FMF
Recalls
None
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K003286 (2001). 7 ancestors in all. 47 later devices descend from it, 4 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2003: 1 other ancestor2002: 1 other ancestor2001: 3 other ancestors2014: 6 descendants cleared2010: 1 descendant cleared2015: 2 descendants cleared2011: 2 descendants cleared2016: 3 descendants cleared2012: 1 descendant cleared2019: 2 descendants cleared2024: 5 descendants cleared2017: 2 descendants cleared2023: 6 descendants cleared2020: 7 descendants cleared2018: 3 descendants cleared2021: 2 descendants cleared2022: 2 descendants cleared2025: 2 descendants cleared2026: 1 descendant clearedK003286 · Symphony Graft Delivery System · Depuyacromed · 2001K021071 · PCCS Graft Delivery System · Biomet, Inc. · 2002 · recalled200020052010201520202025
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 2 other ancestors2 generations back: 3 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 4 descendants2 generations forward: 3 descendants3 generations forward: 3 descendants4 generations forward: 3 descendants5 generations forward: 7 descendants6 generations forward: 12 descendants7 generations forward: 10 descendants8 generations forward: 4 descendants9 generations forward: 1 descendant K021071 · PCCS Graft Delivery System · Biomet, Inc. · 2002 · recalledK003286 · Symphony Graft Delivery System · Depuyacromed · 20010+5
  1. Root · 2 generations backK003286 Symphony Graft Delivery SystemDepuyacromed · 2001
  2. 1 generation backK021071 PCCS Graft Delivery SystemBiomet, Inc. · 2002 · Recalled
  3. This deviceK072330 Controlled Delivery for Osteoplasty (Cdo System) and Graft…Biomet, Inc. · 2007
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 45 of its ownK100754 Graft Delivery System Model SA-6115Micromedics, Inc. · 2010
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 41 of its ownK111632 Infill Graft Delivery SystemPinnacle Spine Group, LLC · 2011
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 40 of its ownK121476 Infill Graft Delivery SystemPinnacle Spine Group, LLC · 2012
  7. Descendant · 3 generations on · 32 of its ownK133021 Mixing Syringe SystemZimmer Knee Creations, Inc. · 2014
  8. Descendant · 4 generations on · 31 of its ownK141245 Etex Mixing and Delivery SystemEtex Corporation · 2014

Showing 5 of 47 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2010: 12011: 22012: 12014: 62015: 22016: 32017: 22018: 32019: 22020: 72021: 22022: 22023: 62024: 52025: 22026: 1
2010high 7 (2020) · low 0 (2013)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 47 · See all
  • K100754Graft Delivery System Model SA-6115Micromedics, Inc. · 2010 · cites it directly45descendants
  • K111632Infill Graft Delivery SystemPinnacle Spine Group, LLC · 2011 · 2 generations on41descendants
  • K121476Infill Graft Delivery SystemPinnacle Spine Group, LLC · 2012 · 3 generations on40descendants
  • K133021Mixing Syringe SystemZimmer Knee Creations, Inc. · 2014 · 3 generations on32descendants
  • K141245Etex Mixing and Delivery SystemEtex Corporation · 2014 · 4 generations on31descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K003286Symphony Graft Delivery SystemDepuyacromed2001—
−1K021071PCCS Graft Delivery SystemBiomet, Inc.20021
0 (this device)K072330Controlled Delivery for Osteoplasty (Cdo System) and Graft Preparation SystemBiomet, Inc.2007—
+1K100754Graft Delivery System Model SA-6115Micromedics, Inc.2010—
+2K111632Infill Graft Delivery SystemPinnacle Spine Group, LLC2011—
+3K121476Infill Graft Delivery SystemPinnacle Spine Group, LLC2012—
+3K133021Mixing Syringe SystemZimmer Knee Creations, Inc.2014—
+4K141245Etex Mixing and Delivery SystemEtex Corporation2014—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200130
200210
200310

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201010
201120
201210
201460
201520
201630
201720
201830
201920
202070
202120
202220
202360
202450
202520
202610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K072330, 2001–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in FMF? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new FMF device

  1. #1 K241821 Luer Lock Syringe with Safety Needle; Luer…score 16.2 · 8 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K030208Imbibe II Syringe
Summary page 1
…mon Name: Piston Syringe Classification Name: FMF (21 CRIF 880.5860) Legally Marketed Devices To Which Substantial Equivalence Is Claimed: CDO' m System K030208 IMBIBE II Syringe (Orthovia, Inc., Malvern, PA) K022246 Symphony Graft Delivery System (DePuy AcroMed, Raynham, MA)…
Orthovita, Inc.2003—
*K022246Modification to Symphony Graft Delivery System
Summary page 1
…FMF (21 CRIF 880.5860) Legally Marketed Devices To Which Substantial Equivalence Is Claimed: CDO' m System K030208 IMBIBE II Syringe (Orthovia, Inc., Malvern, PA) K022246 Symphony Graft Delivery System (DePuy AcroMed, Raynham, MA) Graft Preparation System K021071 Graft Delivery Syste…
Depuyacromed2002—
*K021071PCCS Graft Delivery System
Summary page 1
…System K030208 IMBIBE II Syringe (Orthovia, Inc., Malvern, PA) K022246 Symphony Graft Delivery System (DePuy AcroMed, Raynham, MA) Graft Preparation System K021071 Graft Delivery System (Biomet Biologics, Inc., Warsaw, IN) Device Description: CDO TM System The CDO TM System consists…
Biomet, Inc.20021

Also cleared against K030208: 6 other devices →

What descends from it? (47)

See all 47

4 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K100754Graft Delivery System Model SA-6115Micromedics, Inc.201045
K140710Biomet Graft Delivery SyringesBiomet Spine (Aka Ebi, LLC)20141
K151543Graft Delivery Device with Integrated StyletMicromedics, Inc. (D/B/A Nordson Medical)20150
K141762Perfuse Percutaneous Decompression SystemBiomet, Inc.20140

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 6 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 5.4 years on median.
  • 1 of the 7 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K100754 (Micromedics, Inc., 2010) has gone furthest, with 45 descendants of its own.
  • 6 other devices also cite its predicate K030208.

How does its category compare?

All FMF devices

FMF Syringe, Piston: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2007, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · FMF

13in 2025

2007: 232008: 92009: 142010: 112011: 162012: 92013: 122014: 132015: 112016: 122017: 132018: 82019: 112020: 152021: 202022: 242023: 222024: 142025: 132026 (partial year): 9
2007high 24 (2022) · low 8 (2018)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · FMF

114in 2025

2007: 90 days median2008: 74 days median2009: 94 days median2010: 130 days median2011: 109 days median2012: 86 days median2013: 154 days median2014: 84 days median2015: 87 days median2016: 146 days median2017: 135 days median2018: 87 days median2019: 146 days median2020: 107 days median2021: 175 days median2022: 211 days median2023: 173 days median2024: 130 days median2025: 114 days median2026 (partial year): 239 days median
2007high 239 (2026) · low 74 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · FMF

19in 2023

2007: 62008: 112009: 152010: 122011: 32012: 62013: 12014: 12015: 22017: 32018: 22019: 12020: 22021: 12022: 22023: 19, 18 Class I2026 (partial year): 2, 1 Class I
2007high 19 (2023) · low 0 (2016)2026

Class I (19 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · FMF

4,181in 2025

2007: 6742008: 6912009: 9132010: 6792011: 1862012: 3072013: 3262014: 2442015: 2732016: 6842017: 1,8582018: 3,9522019: 5,8632020: 5,3342021: 5,8742022: 5,2332023: 5,2142024: 5,1222025: 4,181
2007high 5,874 (2021) · low 186 (2011)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code FMF, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200723906674
200897411691
2009149415913
20101113012679
2011161093186
20129866307
2013121541326
201413841244
201511872273
2016121460684
20171313531,858
201888723,952
20191114615,863
20201510725,334
20212017515,874
20222421125,233
20232217319 (18)5,214
20241413005,122
20251311404,181
202692392 (1)—

What is it indicated for?

CDO TM System The CDO TM System is intended to be used for the delivery of hydrated allograft, autograft, or synthetic bone graft material to an orthopedic surgical site. In addition, it is designed to facilitate pre-mixing of bone graft material with I.V. fluids, blood, plasma concentrate, platelet-rich plasma, bone marrow or other specified blood components deemed necessary by the clinical use requirements. Graft Preparation System The Graft…

Read the full statement (126 words)

CDO TM System

The CDO TM System is intended to be used for the delivery of hydrated allograft, autograft, or synthetic bone graft material to an orthopedic surgical site. In addition, it is designed to facilitate pre-mixing of bone graft material with I.V. fluids, blood, plasma concentrate, platelet-rich plasma, bone marrow or other specified blood components deemed necessary by the clinical use requirements.

Graft Preparation System

The Graft Preparation System is intended to be used for the delivery of hydrated allograft, autograft or synthetic bone graft material to an orthopedic surgical site. In addition, it is designed to facilitate pre-mixing of bone graft material with I.V. fluids, blood, plasma concentrate, platelet-rich plasma, bone marrow or other specified blood components deemed necessary by the clinical use requirements.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K072330: Controlled Delivery for Osteoplasty (Cdo System) and Graft Preparation System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K072330

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026