510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Synthes OC Fusion and Synapse Systems

K072434510(k) TraditionalCleared Jan 10, 2008134-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3070

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Synthes Spine Co.Lp · MNI Orthosis, Spinal Pedicle Fixation

Cleared on Jan 10, 2008 as substantially equivalent to K053418 (Synthes Spine Co.Lp, 2006) and 1 other predicate after a 134-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 1985. 2 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Jan 10, 2008
Review
134 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MNI
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K853033 (1985). 7 ancestors in all. 2 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2007: 1 other ancestor2003: 1 other ancestor2002: 1 other ancestor2009: 1 descendant cleared2018: 1 descendant clearedK853033 · Hartshill Rect & Wires, Spinal Fixation System · A.W. Showell (Surgicraft), Ltd. · 1985K965221 · Ransford Cervical Fixation System · Surgicraft, Ltd. · 1997K982322 · Synthes Spine Occipital-Cervical Plate/Rod and Hook System · Synthes (Usa) · 1998K053418 · Synthes OC Fusion System · Synthes Spine Co.Lp · 20061990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor2 generations back: 2 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 1 descendant2 generations forward: 1 descendant K053418 · Synthes OC Fusion System · Synthes Spine Co.Lp · 2006K982322 · Synthes Spine Occipital-Cervical Plate/Rod and Hook System · Synthes (Usa) · 1998K965221 · Ransford Cervical Fixation System · Surgicraft, Ltd. · 1997K853033 · Hartshill Rect & Wires, Spinal Fixation System · A.W. Showell (Surgicraft), Ltd. · 19850
  1. Root · 4 generations backK853033 Hartshill Rect & Wires, Spinal Fixation SystemA.W. Showell (Surgicraft), Ltd. · 1985
  2. 3 generations backK965221 Ransford Cervical Fixation SystemSurgicraft, Ltd. · 1997
  3. 2 generations backK982322 Synthes Spine Occipital-Cervical Plate/Rod and Hook SystemSynthes (Usa) · 1998
  4. 1 generation backK053418 Synthes OC Fusion SystemSynthes Spine Co.Lp · 2006
  5. This deviceK072434 Synthes OC Fusion and Synapse SystemsSynthes Spine Co.Lp · 2008
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK090549 Synthes Synapse TransconnectorSynthes Spine · 2009
  7. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK181350 ASTRA-OCT Spine SystemSpinecraft, LLC · 2018

Most influential descendants

Showing 2 of 2 · See all
  • K090549Synthes Synapse TransconnectorSynthes Spine · 2009 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K181350ASTRA-OCT Spine SystemSpinecraft, LLC · 2018 · 2 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−4K853033Hartshill Rect & Wires, Spinal Fixation SystemA.W. Showell (Surgicraft), Ltd.1985—
−3K965221Ransford Cervical Fixation SystemSurgicraft, Ltd.1997—
−2K982322Synthes Spine Occipital-Cervical Plate/Rod and Hook SystemSynthes (Usa)1998—
−1K053418Synthes OC Fusion SystemSynthes Spine Co.Lp2006—
0 (this device)K072434Synthes OC Fusion and Synapse SystemsSynthes Spine Co.Lp2008—
+1K090549Synthes Synapse TransconnectorSynthes Spine2009—
+2K181350ASTRA-OCT Spine SystemSpinecraft, LLC2018—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200210
200310
200710

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200910
201810
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K072434, 1985–2018Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MNI? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K053418Synthes OC Fusion System
Summary page 1
…lass II Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Devices Panel Product Code KWP Predicate Device(s): K053418 Synthes OC Fusion System Device Description: The Synthes OC Fusion System consists of occipital plates,…
Synthes Spine Co.Lp2006—
*K070573Synapse System
Summary page 3
…Class II Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Devices Panel Product Codes MNH, MNI Predicate Device: K070573 Synthes Synapse System Device Description: The Synthes Synapse System consists of cancellous and cortex…
Synthes Spine Co.Lp2007—

Also cleared against K053418: 1 other device →

What descends from it? (2)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K090549Synthes Synapse TransconnectorSynthes Spine20091

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 23 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 7.8 years on median.
  • None of the 7 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K090549 (Synthes Spine, 2009) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K053418.

How does its category compare?

All MNI devices

MNI Orthosis, Spinal Pedicle Fixation: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2008, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MNI

1in 2017

2007: 202008: 232009: 182010: 162011: 172012: 192013: 142014: 62015: 122016: 72017: 1
2007high 23 (2008) · low 0 (2018)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MNI

168in 2016

2007: 82 days median2008: 64 days median2009: 86 days median2010: 74 days median2011: 111 days median2012: 75 days median2013: 77 days median2014: 104 days median2015: 54 days median2016: 168 days median
2007high 168 (2016) · low 54 (2015)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MNI

1in 2018

2007: 262008: 82009: 32010: 12012: 12013: 42015: 12018: 1
2007high 26 (2007) · low 0 (2011)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MNI

80in 2025

2007: 832008: 1082009: 1382010: 1262011: 1462012: 2002013: 8242014: 3012015: 2602016: 1172017: 2472018: 1342019: 1882020: 1152021: 2702022: 2142023: 1222024: 1142025: 80
2007high 824 (2013) · low 80 (2025)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MNI, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200720822683
200823648108
200918863138
201016741126
2011171110146
201219751200
201314774824
201461040301
201512541260
201671680117
20171—0247
20180—1134
20190—0188
20200—0115
20210—0270
20220—0214
20230—0122
20240—0114
20250—080
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Synthes OC Fusion System is intended to provide stabilization to promote fusion of the occipital-cervical junction. A complete occipital-cervical-thoracic construct can be created by using hooks (C1-T3) that have been previously cleared within the Synthes CerviFix System, Synthes Axon System, and Synthes Synapse System. Synthes OC Fusion System is indicated for the following: · Degenerative disc disease of the cervical vertebrae (neck pain of…

Read the full statement (438 words)

The Synthes OC Fusion System is intended to provide stabilization to promote fusion of the occipital-cervical junction. A complete occipital-cervical-thoracic construct can be created by using hooks (C1-T3) that have been previously cleared within the Synthes CerviFix System, Synthes Axon System, and Synthes Synapse System.

Synthes OC Fusion System is indicated for the following:

· Degenerative disc disease of the cervical vertebrae (neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc as confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies)

* Spondylolisthesis

* Spinal Stenosis

· Fracture/Dislocation

· Atlanto/axial fracture with instability

* Occipital-cervical dislocation

· Revision of previous cervical spinal surgery

a Tumors (primary and metastatic)

The use of screws is limited to placement in the occiput. Screws are not intended to be placed in the cervical spine.

Synthes Synapse System is indicated for the following:

Hooks, Plate/Rods, Plates, Rods and Screws

When intended to promote fusion of the cervical spine and occipitocervical junction (occiput-T3), the plate/rod, plates, rod, hook and screw (3.2 mm cortex) components of the Synthes Cervifix, Axon, OC Fusion and Synapse Systems are indicated for the following:

* Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) (defined as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc as confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies)

* Spondylolisthesis

* Spinal Stenosis

* Fracture/dislocation

* Atlantoaxial fracture with instability

* Occipitocervical dislocation

* Revision of pervious cervical spine surgery

• Tumor

When used to treat these cervical and occipitocervical conditions, screws are limited to occipital fixation only.

Hooks and Rods

The rod and hook components are also intended to provide stabilization to promote fusion following reduction of fracture/dislocation or trauma in the cervical/upper thoracic (C1I-T3) spine.

Rods, Clamps, Screws, Nuts, Variable Axis Screws, Locking Screws, and Transverse Bars

The rods, clamps, screws, nuts, variable axis screws, locking screws, and transverse bars are intended to promote fusion following reduction of fracture/dislocation or trauma in the upper thoracic spine (TlI-T3).

The use of these screws (3.5 mm, 4.0mmu and 4.5 mm cancellous, and 3.5 mm and 4.2 mm cortex) is limited to placement in TI 13 in treating thoracic conditions only. They are not intended to be placed in or treat conditions involving the cervical spine.

The Synthes CerviFix, Axon, and Synapse Systems can also be linked to the Synthes Universal Spinal System using the 3.5 rmm/6.0 mm parallel connectors from that system and via the CerviFix tapered rods using lamina hooks, transverse process hooks, pedicle hooks, 4.2 mm screws and the 5.0 mm/6.0 mm parallel connector.

Warning: This device is not intended for screw attachment or fixation to the posterior elements (pedicles) of the cervical, thoracic, or lumbar spine.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K072434: Synthes OC Fusion and Synapse Systems.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K072434

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026