510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Parietene Duo and Quadra Polypropylene Meshes

K072951510(k) SpecialCleared Dec 19, 200762-day reviewClass III21 CFR 884.5980

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Sofradim Production · OTP Mesh, Surgical, Synthetic, Urogynecologic, For Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Transvaginally Placed

Cleared on Dec 19, 2007 as substantially equivalent to K051503 (Sofradim Production, 2005) and 1 other predicate after a 62-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1999.

Decided
Dec 19, 2007
Review
62 days
Class
Class III
Product code
OTP
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K991400 (1999). 5 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 2002: 1 other ancestor2001: 1 other ancestorK991400 · Parietene Polypropylene Mesh · Sofradim Production · 1999K033376 · Ugytex Mesh · Sofradim Production · 2004K051503 · Ugytex Sual Knit Mesh · Sofradim Production · 20051996199820002002200420062008
  1. Root · 3 generations backK991400 Parietene Polypropylene MeshSofradim Production · 1999
  2. 2 generations backK033376 Ugytex MeshSofradim Production · 2004
  3. 1 generation backK051503 Ugytex Sual Knit MeshSofradim Production · 2005
  4. This deviceK072951 Parietene Duo and Quadra Polypropylene MeshesSofradim Production · 2007
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K991400Parietene Polypropylene MeshSofradim Production1999—
−2K033376Ugytex MeshSofradim Production2004—
−1K051503Ugytex Sual Knit MeshSofradim Production2005—
0 (this device)K072951Parietene Duo and Quadra Polypropylene MeshesSofradim Production2007—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200110
200210
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K072951, 1999–2007Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in OTP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K051503Ugytex Sual Knit Mesh
Summary page 1
…Mesh Parietene™ Quadra Polypropylene Mesh COMMON/USUAL NAME: Surgical Mesh CLASSIFICATION NAME: Mesh, Surgical, Polymeric PREDICATE DEVICE(S): UGYTEX™ Dual Knit Mesh (K051503) Parietene™ Polypropylene Mesh (K891400) DEVICE DESCRIPTION: Parietene™ Duo and Parietene™ Quadra are monofilament polypropylen…
Sofradim Production2005—
*K991400Parietene Polypropylene Mesh
Our OCR of the scanned summary read K891400, FDA’s number for Micro Cautery Needles (Zinnanti Surgical Instruments, Inc.). Corrected to the number one digit away whose FDA name carries the summary’s words for the device, “Parietene™ Polypropylene Mesh”.
Sofradim Production1999—

Also cleared against K051503: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 8 years and passes through 1 company; a new generation was cleared every 2.4 years on median.
  • 1 of the 5 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K051503.

How does its category compare?

All OTP devices

OTP Mesh, Surgical, Synthetic, Urogynecologic, For Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Transvaginally Placed: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2007, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · OTP

2in 2012

2007: 42008: 82009: 62011: 52012: 2
2007high 8 (2008) · low 0 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · OTP

71in 2011

2007: 90 days median2008: 103 days median2009: 21 days median2011: 71 days median
2007high 103 (2008) · low 21 (2009)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · OTP

No recall names OTP since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · OTP

26in 2025

2007: 12009: 32010: 32011: 322012: 4942013: 7,1502014: 7782015: 6842016: 4152017: 2732018: 3922019: 3682020: 1752021: 6472022: 1142023: 592024: 352025: 26
2007high 7,150 (2013) · low 0 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code OTP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200749001
2008810300
200962103
20100—03
2011571032
20122—0494
20130—07,150
20140—0778
20150—0684
20160—0415
20170—0273
20180—0392
20190—0368
20200—0175
20210—0647
20220—0114
20230—059
20240—035
20250—026
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

Parietene™ Duo and Parietene™ Quadra Polypropylene Meshes are indicated for tissue reinforcement and long-lasting stabilization of fascial structures of the pelvic floor in vaginal wall prolapse where surgical treatment is intended either as mechanical support or bridging material for the fascial defect.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K072951: Parietene Duo and Quadra Polypropylene Meshes.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K072951

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026