510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Lotus Ultrasonic System for Cemented Implant Extraction (Uscix)

K072961510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 19, 200761-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.4580

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Sra Developments, Ltd. · JDX Instrument, Surgical, Sonic And Accessory/Attachment

Cleared on Dec 19, 2007 as substantially equivalent to K051053 (Orthosonics, Ltd., 2005) after a 61-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 1990.

Decided
Dec 19, 2007
Review
61 days
Class
Class II
Product code
JDX
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K900003 (1990). 8 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 4 generations backK900003 System Ten Model 100 Surgical SystemAdvanced Osseous Technologies · 1990
  2. 3 generations backK961725 Oscar Orthosonics System for Cemented Arthroplasty RevisionC.L. Mcintosh & Assoc., Inc. · 1996
  3. 2 generations backK021502 Oscar, Model OE3000Orthosonics, Ltd. · 2002
  4. 1 generation backK051053 Oscar, Model OE3000DBOrthosonics, Ltd. · 2005
  5. This deviceK072961 Lotus Ultrasonic System for Cemented Implant Extraction (Uscix)Sra Developments, Ltd. · 2007
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−4K900003System Ten Model 100 Surgical SystemAdvanced Osseous Technologies1990—
−3K961725Oscar Orthosonics System for Cemented Arthroplasty RevisionC.L. Mcintosh & Assoc., Inc.1996—
−2K021502Oscar, Model OE3000Orthosonics, Ltd.2002—
−1K051053Oscar, Model OE3000DBOrthosonics, Ltd.2005—
0 (this device)K072961Lotus Ultrasonic System for Cemented Implant Extraction (Uscix)Sra Developments, Ltd.2007—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199010
199210
199610
200310
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K072961, 1990–2007Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in JDX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new JDX device

  1. #1 K201274 Ultrasonic Osteotomy Surgical Systemscore 3.3 · 9 generations · no Class I recall
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K051053Oscar, Model OE3000DB
Summary page 2
…Ultrasonic System for Cemented Implant extraction System (USCIX) is substantially equivalent to the Orthosonics OSCAR OE3000DB cleared by FDA as K051053. C. DEVICE DESCRIPTION The USCIX consists of a power module which generates the ultrasonic energy and pro…
Orthosonics, Ltd.2005—

Also cleared against K051053: 2 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 17 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 5.8 years on median.
  • 1 of the 8 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K051053.

How does its category compare?

All JDX devices

JDX Instrument, Surgical, Sonic And Accessory/Attachment: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2007, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · JDX

1in 2021

2007: 12009: 22010: 22013: 12016: 12017: 12018: 12021: 1
2007high 2 (2009) · low 0 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · JDX

Too few JDX 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · JDX

No recall names JDX since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · JDX

9in 2025

2009: 12013: 72014: 162015: 62016: 42017: 82018: 422019: 342020: 112021: 72022: 102023: 52024: 62025: 9
2007high 42 (2018) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code JDX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—00
20080—00
20092—01
20102—00
20110—00
20120—00
20131—07
20140—016
20150—06
20161—04
20171—08
20181—042
20190—034
20200—011
20211—07
20220—010
20230—05
20240—06
20250—09
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The LOTUS Ultrasonic System for Cemented Implant extraction System (USCIX) is indicated for the softening of bone cement to facilitate the removal of implants, including pedicle screws and other spinal implants, during revision surgery.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K072961: Lotus Ultrasonic System for Cemented Implant Extraction (Uscix).” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K072961

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026