510(k) · Decided
Recalled · Class II · 2012Dynesys Top-Loading Spinal System
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Zimmer Spine, Inc. · NQP Posterior Metal/Polymer Spinal System, Fusion
Cleared on Feb 8, 2008 after a 71-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. It has been recalled 2 times.
- Decided
- Feb 8, 2008
- Review
- 71 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- NQP
- Recalls
- 2
- Predicates
- 0
The FDA summary names its predicate without a number.
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in NQP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new NQP device
- #1 K203678 CD HORIZON™ Spinal Systemscore 10.9 · 15 generations · no Class I recall
What was it cleared against? (2)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | — | Dynesys® Spinal System Named without a submission number | |
| * | — | Medtronic Sofamor Danek CD HORIZON Spinal System Named without a submission number |
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
Recalls of this device
| Date | Class | Recall | Root cause | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2012 | Class II | Z-0242-2013 | Error in labeling | Zimmer Inc., is initiating a correction to the patient labels of products manufactured before March 20I0 by the Zimmer GmbH production site in Winterthur, Switzerland, after receiving four complaints of a discrepancy between product… |
| May 28, 2009 | Not classified | Z-0370-2010 | Other | The spacer cutter may jam during surgery, preventing use of the instrument and causing surgical delay. |
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
How does its category compare?
All NQP devicesNQP Posterior Metal/Polymer Spinal System, Fusion: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2008, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · NQP
1in 2021
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · NQP
70in 2009
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · NQP
6in 2012
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · NQP
8in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code NQP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 2 | — | 34 | 45 |
| 2008 | 6 | 156 | 4 | 101 |
| 2009 | 3 | 70 | 6 | 109 |
| 2010 | 2 | — | 0 | 119 |
| 2011 | 0 | — | 0 | 60 |
| 2012 | 0 | — | 6 | 66 |
| 2013 | 0 | — | 0 | 58 |
| 2014 | 1 | — | 0 | 46 |
| 2015 | 0 | — | 0 | 38 |
| 2016 | 0 | — | 0 | 79 |
| 2017 | 0 | — | 0 | 28 |
| 2018 | 0 | — | 0 | 29 |
| 2019 | 2 | — | 0 | 8 |
| 2020 | 0 | — | 0 | 15 |
| 2021 | 1 | — | 0 | 7 |
| 2022 | 0 | — | 0 | 12 |
| 2023 | 0 | — | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 0 | — | 0 | 8 |
| 2025 | 0 | — | 0 | 8 |
| 2026 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
When used as a pedicle screw fixation system in skeletally mature patients, the Dynesys Spinal System is intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the following acute and chronic instabilities or deformities of the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine: degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurologic impairment, and failed previous fusion (pseudoarthrosis). In…
Read the full statement (171 words)
When used as a pedicle screw fixation system in skeletally mature patients, the Dynesys Spinal System is intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the following acute and chronic instabilities or deformities of the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine: degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurologic impairment, and failed previous fusion (pseudoarthrosis).
In addition, when used as a pedicle screw fixation system, the Dynesys Spinal System is indicated for use in patients:
* Who are receiving fusions with autogenous graft only;
* Who are having the device fixed or attached to the lumbar or sacral spine;
* Who are having the device removed after the development of a solid fusion mass.
When the Dynesys Spinal System and the OPTIMA ZS Spinal System are used on contiguous levels, they must be used with the Zimmer DTO implant, rod-cord combination implant, and the U&I Corporation OPTIMA ZS Transition Screw. The indications for use for each level is as specified for each system.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K073347 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K073347: Dynesys Top-Loading Spinal System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K073347
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026