510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

PC Ecg 1200W System

K080141510(k) SpecialCleared Apr 25, 200894-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.2300

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Norav Medical, Ltd. · MWI Monitor, Physiological, Patient (Without Arrhythmia Detection Or Alarms)

Cleared on Apr 25, 2008 as substantially equivalent to K000404 (Norav Medical, Ltd., 2000) after a 94-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 2000. 3 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Apr 25, 2008
Review
94 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MWI
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K000404 (2000). 3 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2010: 1 descendant cleared2011: 1 descendant cleared2015: 1 descendant clearedK000404 · PC ECG 1200 · Norav Medical, Ltd. · 2000200020052010201520202025
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 2 descendants2 generations forward: 1 descendant K000404 · PC ECG 1200 · Norav Medical, Ltd. · 20000
  1. Root · 1 generation backK000404 PC ECG 1200Norav Medical, Ltd. · 2000
  2. This deviceK080141 PC Ecg 1200W SystemNorav Medical, Ltd. · 2008
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK100813 QRS Card S-T Segment Analysis Patient Monitoring System Model: QRS…Pulse Biomedical, Inc. · 2010
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK142352 CardiacLinxRoss Medical Technology, Inc. · 2015
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK110463 Pcecg-1200 System with Modular Ecg Analysis System (Means)Norav Medical, Ltd. · 2011

Most influential descendants

Showing 3 of 3 · See all
  • K100813QRS Card S-T Segment Analysis Patient Monitoring System Model: QRS Card UsbPulse Biomedical, Inc. · 2010 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K142352CardiacLinxRoss Medical Technology, Inc. · 2015 · 2 generations on0descendants
  • K110463Pcecg-1200 System with Modular Ecg Analysis System (Means)Norav Medical, Ltd. · 2011 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K000404PC ECG 1200Norav Medical, Ltd.2000—
0 (this device)K080141PC Ecg 1200W SystemNorav Medical, Ltd.2008—
+1K100813QRS Card S-T Segment Analysis Patient Monitoring System Model: QRS Card UsbPulse Biomedical, Inc.2010—
+2K142352CardiacLinxRoss Medical Technology, Inc.2015—
+1K110463Pcecg-1200 System with Modular Ecg Analysis System (Means)Norav Medical, Ltd.2011—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201010
201110
201510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K080141, 2000–2015Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MWI? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MWI device

  1. #1 K230457 Empatica Health Monitoring Platform…score 28.0 · 39 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K000404PC ECG 1200
Summary page 1
…ial Equivalence 21 CFR 807.92(a)(3) The clearance for the PC ECG 1200W System is sought on the grounds of its claimed substantial equivalence (SE) to Norav's PC ECG 1200 k000404 for complete physical and functional identity except the capability of wireless data communication. Device Definition 21 CFR 807.…
Norav Medical, Ltd.2000—

Also cleared against K000404: 1 other device →

What descends from it? (3)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K100813QRS Card S-T Segment Analysis Patient Monitoring System Model: QRS Card UsbPulse Biomedical, Inc.20101
K110463Pcecg-1200 System with Modular Ecg Analysis System (Means)Norav Medical, Ltd.20110

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • Of its descendants, K100813 (Pulse Biomedical, Inc., 2010) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K000404.

How does its category compare?

All MWI devices

MWI Monitor, Physiological, Patient (Without Arrhythmia Detection Or Alarms): FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2008, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MWI

4in 2025

2007: 92008: 92009: 62010: 172011: 112012: 132013: 202014: 162015: 192016: 122017: 132018: 112019: 142020: 82021: 92022: 52023: 82024: 102025: 42026 (partial year): 6
2007high 20 (2013) · low 4 (2025)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MWI

247in 2025

2007: 42 days median2008: 49 days median2009: 112 days median2010: 58 days median2011: 78 days median2012: 104 days median2013: 85 days median2014: 148 days median2015: 127 days median2016: 165 days median2017: 205 days median2018: 217 days median2019: 255 days median2020: 138 days median2021: 161 days median2022: 231 days median2023: 250 days median2024: 202 days median2025: 247 days median2026 (partial year): 239 days median
2007high 255 (2019) · low 42 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MWI

9so far in 2026, the most since 2007

2007: 12008: 12009: 22010: 22011: 32012: 52013: 32014: 62015: 12017: 22019: 42022: 22024: 52026 (partial year): 9
2007high 9 (2026) · low 0 (2016)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MWI

182in 2025

2007: 32008: 32009: 202010: 172011: 162012: 312013: 422014: 302015: 312016: 512017: 852018: 1582019: 1692020: 1102021: 1882022: 1682023: 1792024: 1202025: 182
2007high 188 (2021) · low 3 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MWI, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200794213
200894913
20096112220
20101758217
20111178316
201213104531
20132085342
201416148630
201519127131
201612165051
201713205285
2018112170158
2019142554169
202081380110
202191610188
202252312168
202382500179
2024102025120
202542470182
202662399—

What is it indicated for?

ECG intended use: ECG is intended to disclose either normal condition or patterns of arrhythmia, myocardial ischeria, rate abnormalities, or features of prognostic value in patients: 1)suspected of cardiac abnormalities, or 2) in populations of patients at an age or period in which a routine baseline evaluation of ECG characteristics are desired. 3) QT Analysis is useful in the assessment of long QT syndrome (LQTS). In some instances, LQTS can be…

Read the full statement (393 words)

ECG intended use:

ECG is intended to disclose either normal condition or patterns of arrhythmia, myocardial ischeria, rate abnormalities, or features of prognostic value in patients:

1)suspected of cardiac abnormalities, or

2) in populations of patients at an age or period in which a routine baseline evaluation of ECG characteristics are desired.

3) QT Analysis is useful in the assessment of long QT syndrome (LQTS). In some instances, LQTS can be corrected by phanrmacologic therapy. QT analysis is also used to measure QT dispersion, the difference between maximal and minimal QT values. QT dispersion is a measure of the inhomogeneity of ventricular repolarization.

4) The PC ECG 1200W System has been tested to measure Heart Rate Variability within 1 millisecond tolerance. The clinical significance of Heart Rate Variability measures should be determined by a physician.

5) The PC ECG 1200W System has been tested to measure Late Potential within 1 millisecond tolerance in the time domain, and 1 microvolt tolerance in voltage. The clinical significance of Heart Rate Variability measures should be determined by a physician.

Stress testing intended use:

Angina pectoris (chest pain) is a clinical syndrome resulting from myocardial ischemia, indicative of a reduced blood supply to the cardiac muscle. The electrocardiogram may establish the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease if characteristic changes are present. Stress testing is the most widely used method to decide whether this chest pain is related to myocardial ischemia, and thereby coronary artery disease. In stress testing, the contractile capability of the heart muscle is monitored via ECG during patient exercise. Patients are exercised by bicycle, treadmill, or other means while continuously monitoring the ECG. Exercise loads are determined by predefined protocols. The ECG signals are recorded for the resting, exercise and recovery portions of the exercise protocol. The changes in ECG waveforms are compared to the resting ECG records. Although not necessary, most of the commercial stress test systems control the bicycle or treadmill automatically according to the requirements of the chosen protocol.

ST segment monitoring is intended as an aid in the evaluation of myocardial ischemia in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. The ST segment algorithm has been tested for accuracy of the ST segment data, and a database has been used as a tool for performance testing. The significance of the ST segment changes must be determined by a physician.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K080141: PC Ecg 1200W System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K080141

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026