510(k) · Cleared
ClearedNanocomposite Restorative Kit
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Dmg USA, Inc. · EBF Material, Tooth Shade, Resin
Cleared on May 30, 2008 as substantially equivalent to K042913 (Kuraray Medical, Inc., 2004) after a 98-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 2004. 1 later device descends from it.
- Decided
- May 30, 2008
- Review
- 98 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- EBF
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 1
Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K042913 (2004). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.
Most influential descendants
Showing 1 of 1 · See all- K171772Ecosite Bulk FillDmg USA, Inc. · 2018 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | K042913 | Clearfil Tri-S Bond | Kuraray Medical, Inc. | 2004 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K080480 | Nanocomposite Restorative Kit | Dmg USA, Inc. | 2008 | — |
| +1 | K171772 | Ecosite Bulk Fill | Dmg USA, Inc. | 2018 | — |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in EBF? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new EBF device
- #1 K202846 Tera Harzscore 18.5 · 7 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (3)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K042913 | Clearfil Tri-S BondSummary page 2…Nanocomposite Flowable: Sternomega Composite LC K862(trgl mlmd MDP One Bottle Bond: I Cearit-S bond K042913 (Kuraray Medical inc.) Safety and Performance: This submission is an Abbreviated 510(k) as described in FDA's guidance documen… | 2004 |
| * | — | SternOmega Composite LC Named without a submission number | |
| * | — | Sternomega Composite LC Named without a submission number |
What descends from it? (1)
1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
| Number | Device | Decided | Descendants |
|---|---|---|---|
| K171772 | Ecosite Bulk Fill | 2018 | 0 |
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
How does its category compare?
All EBF devicesEBF Material, Tooth Shade, Resin: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2008, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · EBF
15in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · EBF
43in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · EBF
1in 2020
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · EBF
1in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code EBF, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 19 | 49 | 1 | 6 |
| 2008 | 14 | 79 | 42 | 10 |
| 2009 | 20 | 84 | 1 | 8 |
| 2010 | 19 | 75 | 6 | 31 |
| 2011 | 19 | 81 | 7 | 31 |
| 2012 | 11 | 86 | 0 | 62 |
| 2013 | 13 | 153 | 0 | 246 |
| 2014 | 10 | 112 | 0 | 195 |
| 2015 | 17 | 123 | 0 | 119 |
| 2016 | 20 | 205 | 0 | 143 |
| 2017 | 15 | 108 | 4 | 42 |
| 2018 | 15 | 115 | 0 | 8 |
| 2019 | 17 | 159 | 2 | 11 |
| 2020 | 15 | 190 | 1 | 2 |
| 2021 | 13 | 178 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 17 | 63 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 9 | 87 | 0 | 8 |
| 2024 | 18 | 120 | 0 | 5 |
| 2025 | 15 | 43 | 0 | 1 |
| 2026 | 16 | 59 | 2 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The Nanocomposite Restorative Kit consists of 2 types of nanocomposite restorative materials with a compatible bonding agent. The specific indications of each kit component are as follows: 1. Nanocomposite is indicated for: Restorations of all cavity classes Fabrication of direct inlays, onlays and indirect veneers Core build-up after tooth preparation with the root canal post Machinable Composite for Restorations Indirect Inlays/Onlays 2. Nanocomposite…
Read the full statement (111 words)
The Nanocomposite Restorative Kit consists of 2 types of nanocomposite restorative materials with a compatible bonding agent. The specific indications of each kit component are as follows:
1. Nanocomposite is indicated for:
Restorations of all cavity classes
Fabrication of direct inlays, onlays and indirect veneers
Core build-up after tooth preparation with the root canal post
Machinable Composite for Restorations
Indirect Inlays/Onlays
2. Nanocomposite Flowable is indicated for:
Small fillings of cavity classes III, IV and V
Minimally invasive fillings for deciduous teeth (all cavity classes)
Splinting of teeth
3. MDP One Bottle Bond is indicated for:
Bonding resin-based materials (especially light-cure composite / compomer materials) to tooth structure (dentin and enamel)
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K080480 · printed Nov 3, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K080480: Nanocomposite Restorative Kit.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 3, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K080480
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026