510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Maxim Plastic Applicator & Non-Applicator Tampons

K080775510(k) TraditionalCleared Sep 10, 2008175-day reviewClass II21 CFR 884.5470

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Tosama D.D. · HEB Tampon, Menstrual, Unscented

Cleared on Sep 10, 2008 after a 175-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 5 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Sep 10, 2008
Review
175 days
Class
Class II
Product code
HEB
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

5 later devices descend from it, 3 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2015: 1 descendant cleared2009: 1 descendant cleared2012: 1 descendant cleared2019: 1 descendant cleared2016: 1 descendant cleared20052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK080775 Maxim Plastic Applicator & Non-Applicator TamponsTosama D.D. · 2008
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 2 of its ownK151470 Opal by Femtex and Private Label Unscented Compact Applicator…First Quality Hygienic, Inc. · 2015
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK182142 FEMME Applicator TamponJiangsu Yoai Technology Co., Ltd. · 2019
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK161877 Opal by Femtex Pull & Snap and Private Label Unscented Compact…First Quality Hygienic, Inc. · 2016
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK120481 Lil-Lets Silk Comfort Compact, Plastic Applicator, Lite, Regular…Tosama, D.O.O. · 2012
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK092054 Moxie Plastic Applicator and Moxie Non-Applicator TamponTosama D.D. · 2009

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 5 · See all
  • K151470Opal by Femtex and Private Label Unscented Compact Applicator Tampon, Light Absorbency…First Quality Hygienic, Inc. · 2015 · cites it directly2descendants
  • K182142FEMME Applicator TamponJiangsu Yoai Technology Co., Ltd. · 2019 · 2 generations on0descendants
  • K161877Opal by Femtex Pull & Snap and Private Label Unscented Compact Applicator Tampon…First Quality Hygienic, Inc. · 2016 · 2 generations on0descendants
  • K120481Lil-Lets Silk Comfort Compact, Plastic Applicator, Lite, Regular, Super, Super Plus and…Tosama, D.O.O. · 2012 · cites it directly0descendants
  • K092054Moxie Plastic Applicator and Moxie Non-Applicator TamponTosama D.D. · 2009 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K080775Maxim Plastic Applicator & Non-Applicator TamponsTosama D.D.2008—
+1K151470Opal by Femtex and Private Label Unscented Compact Applicator Tampon, Light…First Quality Hygienic, Inc.2015—
+2K182142FEMME Applicator TamponJiangsu Yoai Technology Co., Ltd.2019—
+2K161877Opal by Femtex Pull & Snap and Private Label Unscented Compact Applicator…First Quality Hygienic, Inc.2016—
+1K120481Lil-Lets Silk Comfort Compact, Plastic Applicator, Lite, Regular, Super, Super…Tosama, D.O.O.2012—
+1K092054Moxie Plastic Applicator and Moxie Non-Applicator TamponTosama D.D.2009—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200910
201210
201510
201610
201910
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K080775, 2008–2019Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HEB? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new HEB device

  1. #1 K251033 Unscented menstrual long applicator tampon…score 14.3 · 6 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—Tampax Compak, Compact Plastic Appli. Super Tampo
Named without a submission number
—
*—o.b.® Non-applicator Tampons
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (5)

3 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K151470Opal by Femtex and Private Label Unscented Compact Applicator Tampon, Light Absorbency…First Quality Hygienic, Inc.20152
K120481Lil-Lets Silk Comfort Compact, Plastic Applicator, Lite, Regular, Super, Super Plus and…Tosama, D.O.O.20120
K092054Moxie Plastic Applicator and Moxie Non-Applicator TamponTosama D.D.20090

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K151470 (First Quality Hygienic, Inc., 2015) has gone furthest, with 2 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All HEB devices

HEB Tampon, Menstrual, Unscented: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2008, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · HEB

6in 2025

2008: 12009: 72010: 32011: 32012: 32013: 22014: 42015: 52016: 12017: 22018: 52019: 72020: 22021: 62022: 32023: 52024: 22025: 62026 (partial year): 1
2007high 7 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HEB

82in 2025

2009: 136 days median2010: 76 days median2011: 28 days median2012: 114 days median2014: 173 days median2015: 114 days median2018: 140 days median2019: 182 days median2021: 60 days median2022: 81 days median2023: 109 days median2025: 82 days median
2007high 182 (2019) · low 28 (2011)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · HEB

29in 2025

2010: 12011: 12018: 42025: 29
2007high 29 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HEB

452in 2025

2007: 382008: 312009: 302010: 1382011: 2912012: 4162013: 2592014: 1672015: 1322016: 1012017: 1942018: 3632019: 3,0342020: 1,7142021: 1,4032022: 1,0552023: 7022024: 5342025: 452
2007high 3,034 (2019) · low 30 (2009)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HEB, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—038
20081—031
20097136030
20103761138
20113281291
201231140416
20132—0259
201441730167
201551140132
20161—0101
20172—0194
201851404363
2019718203,034
20202—01,714
202166001,403
202238101,055
202351090702
20242—0534
202568229452
20261—0—

What is it indicated for?

The MAXIM tampons (both types) are unscented tampons for:

• Women's personal hygiene with respect to intra vaginal absorption of menstrual or other vaginal disctlarge.

• The plastic applicator is for easing the placement of the tampon correctly into the vagina (only the MAXIM Plastic Applicator Tampon).

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K080775: Maxim Plastic Applicator & Non-Applicator Tampons.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K080775

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026