510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Cerec Opti Spray

K080882510(k) TraditionalCleared Apr 11, 200811-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.3660

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Sirona Dental Systems GmbH · ELW Material, Impression

Cleared on Apr 11, 2008 after an 11-day review. FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate. 2 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Apr 11, 2008
Review
11 days
Class
Class II
Product code
ELW
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

2 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2011: 2 descendants cleared20052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK080882 Cerec Opti SpraySirona Dental Systems GmbH · 2008
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK113263 Arges Imaging Contrast SprayArges Imaging, Inc. · 2011
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK103586 Ios Fastscan SprayIos Technnologies, Inc. · 2011

Most influential descendants

Showing 2 of 2 · See all
  • K113263Arges Imaging Contrast SprayArges Imaging, Inc. · 2011 · cites it directly0descendants
  • K103586Ios Fastscan SprayIos Technnologies, Inc. · 2011 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K080882Cerec Opti SpraySirona Dental Systems GmbH2008—
+1K113263Arges Imaging Contrast SprayArges Imaging, Inc.2011—
+1K103586Ios Fastscan SprayIos Technnologies, Inc.2011—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201120
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K080882, 2008–2011Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA 510(k) statement (indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in ELW? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new ELW device

  1. #1 K254152 Dia-X Sil Light Bodyscore 14.1 · 8 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.

What descends from it? (2)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K113263Arges Imaging Contrast SprayArges Imaging, Inc.20110
K103586Ios Fastscan SprayIos Technnologies, Inc.20110

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K113263 (Arges Imaging, Inc., 2011) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All ELW devices

ELW Material, Impression: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2008, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · ELW

2in 2025

2007: 72008: 112009: 72010: 52011: 92012: 72013: 52014: 112015: 82016: 72017: 32018: 52019: 22020: 42021: 32022: 72023: 22024: 32025: 22026 (partial year): 3
2007high 11 (2008) · low 2 (2019)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · ELW

98in 2024

2007: 60 days median2008: 30 days median2009: 43 days median2010: 88 days median2011: 83 days median2012: 87 days median2013: 67 days median2014: 122 days median2015: 93 days median2016: 166 days median2017: 89 days median2018: 126 days median2020: 99 days median2021: 76 days median2022: 60 days median2024: 98 days median2026 (partial year): 268 days median
2007high 268 (2026) · low 30 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · ELW

3in 2016

2010: 12012: 12013: 32016: 3
2007high 3 (2013) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · ELW

22in 2025

2007: 92008: 172009: 72010: 162011: 152012: 142013: 322014: 352015: 182016: 152017: 172018: 142019: 242020: 82021: 62022: 92023: 132024: 32025: 22
2007high 35 (2014) · low 3 (2024)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code ELW, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200776009
20081130017
200974307
2010588116
2011983015
2012787114
2013567332
201411122035
2015893018
20167166315
2017389017
20185126014
20192—024
202049908
202137606
202276009
20232—013
202439803
20252—022
202632680—

What is it indicated for?

CEREC Opti Spray is indicated as a coating medium for optical impressions with the CEREC system. It aids in intraoral topographical recordings of prepared and unprepared teeth and their surrounding.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA 510(k) statement.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K080882: Cerec Opti Spray.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 3, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K080882

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026