510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Handheld Ecg Monitor, Model MD100

K080933510(k) TraditionalCleared Sep 26, 2008177-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.2340

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Beijing Choice Electronic Technololgy Co., Ltd. · DPS Electrocardiograph

Cleared on Sep 26, 2008 as substantially equivalent to K060766 (Omron Healthcare, Inc., 2006) after a 177-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1999. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Sep 26, 2008
Review
177 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DPS
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K992696 (1999). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2011: 1 descendant clearedK992696 · Ecg Minimonitor, Model CG-5000 · Card Guard Scientific Survival, Ltd. · 1999K060766 · Portable, Electrocardiograph (Ecg) Monitor, Model HCG-801 · Omron Healthcare, Inc. · 20061995200020052010201520202025
  1. Root · 2 generations backK992696 Ecg Minimonitor, Model CG-5000Card Guard Scientific Survival, Ltd. · 1999
  2. 1 generation backK060766 Portable, Electrocardiograph (Ecg) Monitor, Model HCG-801Omron Healthcare, Inc. · 2006
  3. This deviceK080933 Handheld Ecg Monitor, Model MD100Beijing Choice Electronic Technololgy Co., Ltd. · 2008
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK103077 Ecg PenMeridian Dynamics Biomedical, Inc. · 2011

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K103077Ecg PenMeridian Dynamics Biomedical, Inc. · 2011 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K992696Ecg Minimonitor, Model CG-5000Card Guard Scientific Survival, Ltd.1999—
−1K060766Portable, Electrocardiograph (Ecg) Monitor, Model HCG-801Omron Healthcare, Inc.2006—
0 (this device)K080933Handheld Ecg Monitor, Model MD100Beijing Choice Electronic Technololgy Co., Ltd.2008—
+1K103077Ecg PenMeridian Dynamics Biomedical, Inc.2011—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201110
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K080933, 1999–2011Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DPS? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new DPS device

  1. #1 K212112 Cardiologs Holter Platformscore 18.6 · 5 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K060766Portable, Electrocardiograph (Ecg) Monitor, Model HCG-801
Summary page 1
…I Device: MD100 Handheld ECG Monitor Predicate Devices: Omron HCG-801 Portable ECG Monitor K060766 2j7 kevice Description…
Omron Healthcare, Inc.2006—

Also cleared against K060766: 10 other devices →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K103077Ecg PenMeridian Dynamics Biomedical, Inc.20110

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 9 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 6.7 years on median.
  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K103077 (Meridian Dynamics Biomedical, Inc., 2011) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 10 other devices also cite its predicate K060766.

How does its category compare?

All DPS devices

DPS Electrocardiograph: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2008, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · DPS

6in 2025

2007: 112008: 132009: 142010: 112011: 222012: 122013: 102014: 112015: 82016: 112017: 92018: 142019: 32020: 62021: 52022: 62023: 102024: 82025: 62026 (partial year): 6
2007high 22 (2011) · low 3 (2019)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DPS

163in 2025

2007: 87 days median2008: 31 days median2009: 84 days median2010: 104 days median2011: 154 days median2012: 117 days median2013: 134 days median2014: 253 days median2015: 178 days median2016: 229 days median2017: 177 days median2018: 221 days median2019: 178 days median2020: 224 days median2021: 135 days median2022: 244 days median2023: 236 days median2024: 260 days median2025: 163 days median2026 (partial year): 258 days median
2007high 260 (2024) · low 31 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · DPS

3in 2025

2007: 22009: 12010: 22011: 12019: 92020: 22021: 12022: 12023: 32024: 4, 1 Class I2025: 32026 (partial year): 4
2007high 9 (2019) · low 0 (2008)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DPS

55in 2025

2007: 92008: 172009: 142010: 212011: 1212012: 562013: 152014: 152015: 302016: 122017: 152018: 192019: 272020: 592021: 242022: 592023: 542024: 642025: 55
2007high 121 (2011) · low 9 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DPS, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007118729
20081331017
20091484114
201011104221
2011221541121
201212117056
201310134015
201411253015
20158178030
201611229012
20179177015
201814221019
20193178927
20206224259
20215135124
20226244159
202310236354
202482604 (1)64
20256163355
202662584—

What is it indicated for?

The Handheld ECG Monitor MD100 is intended for use in non-invasive recording and displaying ECG waveform by adult patients. In addition, it also can provide to the treating physician with relevant data on the cardiac rhythm in hospital patients. It is immediately available at any time to manually record transient cardiac events, suitable for patient and professional use, helpful in determining the cardiac rhythm at the time of symptoms. This ECG monitor allows the patient to record their ECG data into the device memory for display by healthcare professional during office visits.

The product is not a conventional diagnostic tool.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K080933: Handheld Ecg Monitor, Model MD100.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 3, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K080933

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026