510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Tephaflex Absorbable Suture

K081099510(k) TraditionalCleared Jul 15, 200889-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.4494

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Tepha, Inc. · NWJ Suture, Recombinant Technology

Cleared on Jul 15, 2008 after an 89-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 4 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Jul 15, 2008
Review
89 days
Class
Class II
Product code
NWJ
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

4 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2010: 1 descendant cleared2012: 1 descendant cleared2013: 2 descendants cleared20052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK081099 Tephaflex Absorbable SutureTepha, Inc. · 2008
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 2 of its ownK122487 Biofiber SytureTornier, Inc. · 2012
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 1 of its ownK130422 Phantom Fiber Biofiber SutureTornier, Inc. · 2013 · Recalled
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK132348 Tephaflex Braided SutureTepha, Inc. · 2013
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK100876 Aesculap Monomax Absorbable SutureAesculap, Inc. · 2010

Most influential descendants

Showing 4 of 4 · See all
  • K122487Biofiber SytureTornier, Inc. · 2012 · cites it directly2descendants
  • K130422Phantom Fiber Biofiber SutureTornier, Inc. · 2013 · 2 generations on1descendant
  • K132348Tephaflex Braided SutureTepha, Inc. · 2013 · 2 generations on0descendants
  • K100876Aesculap Monomax Absorbable SutureAesculap, Inc. · 2010 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K081099Tephaflex Absorbable SutureTepha, Inc.2008—
+1K122487Biofiber SytureTornier, Inc.2012—
+2K130422Phantom Fiber Biofiber SutureTornier, Inc.20131
+2K132348Tephaflex Braided SutureTepha, Inc.2013—
+1K100876Aesculap Monomax Absorbable SutureAesculap, Inc.2010—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201010
201210
201320
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K081099, 2008–2013Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in NWJ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new NWJ device

  1. #1 K211307 GalaSTITCH Absorbable Monofilament Suturescore 1.4 · 1 generation · no Class I recall
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—Tepha, Inc., TephaFLEX Absorbable Suture
Named without a submission number
—
*—ENTrigue Surgical, Inc., BioElast™ Absorbable suture
Named without a submission number
—
*—Ethicon, Inc., PDS II Absorbable Suture
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (4)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K122487Biofiber SytureTornier, Inc.20122
K100876Aesculap Monomax Absorbable SutureAesculap, Inc.20100

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K122487 (Tornier, Inc., 2012) has gone furthest, with 2 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All NWJ devices

NWJ Suture, Recombinant Technology: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2008, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · NWJ

1in 2021

2007: 22008: 22010: 12012: 12013: 22021: 1
2007high 2 (2007) · low 0 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · NWJ

Too few NWJ 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · NWJ

No recall names NWJ since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · NWJ

4in 2025

2014: 122015: 82016: 132017: 132018: 102019: 32020: 82021: 12022: 72023: 42024: 12025: 4
2007high 13 (2016) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code NWJ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20072—00
20082—00
20090—00
20101—00
20110—00
20121—00
20132—00
20140—012
20150—08
20160—013
20170—013
20180—010
20190—03
20200—08
20211—01
20220—07
20230—04
20240—01
20250—04
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

TephaFLEX absorbable sutures are indicated for use in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, but not for use in cardiovascular or neurological tissues, microsurgery or ophthalmic surgery.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K081099: Tephaflex Absorbable Suture.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K081099

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026