510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2020

Vertex Reconstruction System

K081297510(k) SpecialCleared Jun 11, 200835-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3050Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Medtronic Sofamor Danek · KWP Appliance, Fixation, Spinal Interlaminal

Cleared on Jun 11, 2008 after a 35-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 239 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Jun 11, 2008
Review
35 days
Class
Class II
Product code
KWP
Recalls
1
Predicates
0

239 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2008: 1 descendant cleared2009: 3 descendants cleared2013: 13 descendants cleared2012: 7 descendants cleared2011: 3 descendants cleared2017: 18 descendants cleared2016: 12 descendants cleared2018: 17 descendants cleared2025: 18 descendants cleared2014: 15 descendants cleared2026: 17 descendants cleared2022: 18 descendants cleared2021: 12 descendants cleared2023: 20 descendants cleared2020: 18 descendants cleared2019: 11 descendants cleared2015: 16 descendants cleared2024: 20 descendants cleared20052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK081297 Vertex Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2008
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 223 of its ownK083071 Vertex Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2008 · Recalled
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 146 of its ownK082728 Vertex Recontruction System, Vertex Select Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. · 2009
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 138 of its ownK091365 Vertex Reconstruction System, Vertex Select Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Soafamor Danek · 2009
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 128 of its ownK111510 CD Horizon Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · 2011
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 127 of its ownK121630 Range Spinal SystemK2m, Inc. · 2012

Showing 5 of 239 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2008: 12009: 32011: 32012: 72013: 132014: 152015: 162016: 122017: 182018: 172019: 112020: 182021: 122022: 182023: 202024: 202025: 182026: 17
2008high 20 (2023) · low 0 (2010)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 239 · See all
  • K083071Vertex Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2008 · cites it directly223descendants
  • K082728Vertex Recontruction System, Vertex Select Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. · 2009 · cites it directly146descendants
  • K091365Vertex Reconstruction System, Vertex Select Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Soafamor Danek · 2009 · 2 generations on138descendants
  • K111510CD Horizon Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · 2011 · 2 generations on128descendants
  • K121630Range Spinal SystemK2m, Inc. · 2012 · 3 generations on127descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K081297Vertex Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek2008—
+1K083071Vertex Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek20081
+1K082728Vertex Recontruction System, Vertex Select Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.2009—
+2K091365Vertex Reconstruction System, Vertex Select Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Soafamor Danek2009—
+2K111510CD Horizon Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.2011—
+3K121630Range Spinal SystemK2m, Inc.2012—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200810
200930
201130
201270
2013130
2014150
2015160
2016120
2017180
2018170
2019110
2020180
2021120
2022180
2023200
2024200
2025180
2026170
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K081297, 2008–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in KWP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—VERTEX® Reconstruction System
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (239)

See all 239

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K083071Vertex Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek2008223
K082728Vertex Recontruction System, Vertex Select Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.2009146

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Mar 26, 2020Class IIZ-1941-2020Nonconforming Material/ComponentNonconforming product; length of the product measured shorter than the labeled length.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K083071 (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, 2008) has gone furthest, with 223 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All KWP devices

KWP Appliance, Fixation, Spinal Interlaminal: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2008, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · KWP

9in 2015

2007: 142008: 132009: 122010: 142011: 122012: 182013: 122014: 132015: 9
2007high 18 (2012) · low 0 (2016)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · KWP

113in 2015

2007: 96 days median2008: 50 days median2009: 89 days median2010: 186 days median2011: 67 days median2012: 112 days median2013: 99 days median2014: 138 days median2015: 113 days median
2007high 186 (2010) · low 50 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · KWP

2in 2022

2007: 22008: 12009: 232010: 22011: 62012: 12013: 32015: 12016: 32018: 12019: 22022: 2
2007high 23 (2009) · low 0 (2014)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · KWP

494in 2025

2007: 2102008: 5942009: 6822010: 4742011: 7922012: 9182013: 1,0902014: 1,0222015: 1,3482016: 1,3792017: 8642018: 6572019: 5182020: 7962021: 5252022: 3352023: 3322024: 4362025: 494
2007high 1,379 (2016) · low 210 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code KWP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200714962210
200813501594
2009128923682
2010141862474
201112676792
2012181121918
2013129931,090
20141313801,022
2015911311,348
20160—31,379
20170—0864
20180—1657
20190—2518
20200—0796
20210—0525
20220—2335
20230—0332
20240—0436
20250—0494
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

When intended to promote fusion of the occipitocervical spine, cervical spine, and the thoracic spine, (Occiput-T3), the VERTEX® Reconstruction System is indicated for the following: DDD (neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies), spondylolisthesis, spinal stenosis, fracture, dislocation, failed previous fusion and/or tumors. Occipitocervical Components…

Read the full statement (257 words)

When intended to promote fusion of the occipitocervical spine, cervical spine, and the thoracic spine, (Occiput-T3), the VERTEX® Reconstruction System is indicated for the following:

DDD (neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies), spondylolisthesis, spinal stenosis, fracture, dislocation, failed previous fusion and/or tumors.

Occipitocervical Components: PlateRod/Plates/Rods/OccipitalScrews/Hooks

The occipitocervical plate rods, plates, rods, occipital screws, and hooks are intended to provide stabilization to promote fusion following reduction of fracture/dislocation or trauma in the occipitocervical junction and the cervical spine. When used to treat these occipitocervical and cervical conditions, these screws are limited to occipital fixation only. The screws are not intended to be placed in the cervical spine.

Occipitocervical constructs require bilateral fixation to C2 and below. Note: Segmental fixation is recommended for these constructs.

Hooks and Rods

The hooks and rods are also intended to provide stabilization to promote fusion following reduction of fracture/dislocation or trauma in the cervical/upper thoracic (C1-T3) spine.

Multi-axial Screws/Connectors

The use of multi-axial screws are limited to placement in T1-T3. The screws are not intended to be placed in the cervical spine.

Titanium ATLAS® Cable System to be used with the VERTEX® Reconstruction System allows for cable attachment to the posterior cervical or thoracic spine.

In order to achieve additional levels of fixation, the VERTEX® Reconstruction System may be connected to the CD HORIZON® Spinal System rods with the VERTEX® rod connectors. Refer to the CD HORIZON® Spinal System package insert for a list of the CD HORIZON® Spinal System indications of use.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K081297: Vertex Reconstruction System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K081297

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026