510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Accela System

K081578510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 20, 200815-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.4810

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Genesis Biosystems, Inc. · GEX Powered Laser Surgical Instrument

Cleared on Jun 20, 2008 as substantially equivalent to K053324 (Chromogenex Plc, 2006) and 2 other predicates after a 15-day review. Its family tree reaches back 9 generations to 1992.

Decided
Jun 20, 2008
Review
15 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GEX
Recalls
None
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 9 generations to K910422 (1992). 88 ancestors in all, the oldest K885026 (1989). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 9 generations backK910422 Model RD-1200 Ruby Laser SystemSpectrum Medical Technologies, Inc. · 1992
  2. 5 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK023954 Altus Medical Coolglide Laser Systems and AccessoriesAltus Medical, Inc. · 2003
  4. 2 generations backK033946 Lovely SystemMsq (M2), Ltd. · 2004
  5. 1 generation backK053324 Chromolite SystemChromogenex Plc · 2006
  6. This deviceK081578 Accela SystemGenesis Biosystems, Inc. · 2008
Show all 9 generations
  1. Root · 9 generations backK910422 Model RD-1200 Ruby Laser SystemSpectrum Medical Technologies, Inc. · 1992
  2. 8 generations backK961279 Sharplan Lasers, Inc. Ruby Laser SystemSharplan Lasers, Inc. · 1996
  3. 7 generations backK962446 Sharplan Ruby Laser SystemSharplan Lasers, Inc. · 1997
  4. 6 generations backK974536 Photoderm HR SystemEsc Medical Systems, Ltd. · 1998
  5. 5 generations backK013366 Prolite Pulsed Light System for the Removal of Unwanted HairMedical Bio Care Sweden AB · 2002
  6. 4 generations backK022568 Prolite/Plasmalite MPX Pulsed Light System for Treatment of Unwanted…Medical Bio Care Sweden AB · 2002
  7. 3 generations backK023954 Altus Medical Coolglide Laser Systems and AccessoriesAltus Medical, Inc. · 2003
  8. 2 generations backK033946 Lovely SystemMsq (M2), Ltd. · 2004
  9. 1 generation backK053324 Chromolite SystemChromogenex Plc · 2006
  10. This deviceK081578 Accela SystemGenesis Biosystems, Inc. · 2008
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−9K910422Model RD-1200 Ruby Laser SystemSpectrum Medical Technologies, Inc.1992—
−8K961279Sharplan Lasers, Inc. Ruby Laser SystemSharplan Lasers, Inc.1996—
−7K962446Sharplan Ruby Laser SystemSharplan Lasers, Inc.1997—
−6K974536Photoderm HR SystemEsc Medical Systems, Ltd.1998—
−5K013366Prolite Pulsed Light System for the Removal of Unwanted HairMedical Bio Care Sweden AB2002—
−4K022568Prolite/Plasmalite MPX Pulsed Light System for Treatment of Unwanted HairMedical Bio Care Sweden AB2002—
−3K023954Altus Medical Coolglide Laser Systems and AccessoriesAltus Medical, Inc.2003—
−2K033946Lovely SystemMsq (M2), Ltd.2004—
−1K053324Chromolite SystemChromogenex Plc2006—
0 (this device)K081578Accela SystemGenesis Biosystems, Inc.2008—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198910
199010
199130
199360
199470
199570
199670
199780
199860
199940
200070
200170
200290
200360
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K081578, 1992–2008Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GEX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new GEX device

  1. #1 K222064 The Alma Soprano Titaniumscore 38.1 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K053324Chromolite System
Summary page 2
…ical characteristics, performance, intended use, indications for use and operator interface to; • Chromogenex (K053324) * Sciton (K032460) * Lumenis (K020839) System Description:…
Chromogenex Plc2006—
*K032460Profile BBL System
Summary page 2
…indications for use and operator interface to; • Chromogenex (K053324) * Sciton (K032460) * Lumenis (K020839) System Description: The Accela is an Intense Pulsed Light-based medi…
Sciton, Inc2003—
*K020839Quantum, Models SR, HR, DL; Vasculight, Models SR, HR, VS, VX, DL
Summary page 2
…operator interface to; • Chromogenex (K053324) * Sciton (K032460) * Lumenis (K020839) System Description: The Accela is an Intense Pulsed Light-based medical device utilizing xe…
Lumenis, Inc.2002—

Also cleared against K053324: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 16 years and passes through 8 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.2 years on median.
  • 2 of the 88 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K053324.

How does its category compare?

All GEX devices

GEX Powered Laser Surgical Instrument: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2008, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · GEX

83in 2025

2007: 732008: 1072009: 692010: 502011: 412012: 452013: 462014: 612015: 472016: 512017: 672018: 512019: 412020: 522021: 532022: 602023: 522024: 822025: 832026 (partial year): 57
2007high 107 (2008) · low 41 (2011)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GEX

90in 2025

2007: 79 days median2008: 86 days median2009: 100 days median2010: 96 days median2011: 83 days median2012: 118 days median2013: 144 days median2014: 147 days median2015: 112 days median2016: 114 days median2017: 90 days median2018: 78 days median2019: 88 days median2020: 90 days median2021: 123 days median2022: 152 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 90 days median2025: 90 days median2026 (partial year): 90 days median
2007high 152 (2022) · low 78 (2018)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · GEX

3in 2024

2007: 92008: 22010: 42011: 182012: 52013: 32014: 62016: 12017: 5, 1 Class I2018: 52019: 62020: 12023: 62024: 32026 (partial year): 2
2007high 18 (2011) · low 0 (2009)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GEX

2,720in 2025

2007: 3422008: 2322009: 2092010: 1,7112011: 3,0242012: 2,0002013: 2,2362014: 2,0362015: 2,0992016: 2,5852017: 2,9772018: 3,5252019: 2,7092020: 2,1832021: 3,4652022: 2,2882023: 2,3372024: 2,1872025: 2,720
2007high 3,525 (2018) · low 209 (2009)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GEX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200773799342
2008107862232
2009691000209
2010509641,711
20114183183,024
20124511852,000
20134614432,236
20146114762,036
20154711202,099
20165111412,585
201767905 (1)2,977
2018517853,525
2019418862,709
2020529012,183
20215312303,465
20226015202,288
2023528762,337
2024829032,187
2025839002,720
202657902—

What is it indicated for?

Indications for Use for Fitzpatrick skin types (I to VI) The removal of unwanted hair and to effect stable long-term or *permanent hair reduction. *Permanent hair reduction is defined as a long-term stable reduction in the number of hairs re-growing after a treatment regimen. The treatment of moderate inflammatory acne vulgaris The treatment of benign pigmented epidermal lesions including dyschromia, hyperpigmentation, melasma, ephelides (freckles) The…

Read the full statement (244 words)

Indications for Use for Fitzpatrick skin types (I to VI)

The removal of unwanted hair and to effect stable long-term or *permanent hair reduction.

*Permanent hair reduction is defined as a long-term stable reduction in the number of hairs re-growing after a treatment regimen.

The treatment of moderate inflammatory acne vulgaris

The treatment of benign pigmented epidermal lesions including dyschromia, hyperpigmentation, melasma, ephelides (freckles)

The treatment of cutaneous lesions including warts, scars, and striae.

The treatment of benign cutaneous vascular lesions, including port wine stains, hemangiomas, facial, truncal and leg telangiectasias, erythema of rosacea, angiomas, and spider angiomas, poikiloderma of civatte, leg veins and venous malformations.

The integrated thermal cooling is indicated for use in cooling the epidermis at the treatment site prior to, during, and after light or laser treatment in general aesthetic dermatologic and plastic surgery procedures.

Reduce pain during and/or with light or laser treatment (via partial anesthesia from cooling)

Reduce discomfort during and/or associated with light or laser treatment

Minimize thermal injury, including thermal necrosis, to non-target skin and skin structures during and/or associated with light or laser treatment, thus reducing possible complications such as scabbing, scarring, hyper - and/or hypopigmentation

Allow the use of higher light or laser fluences for light or laser treatments (such as for hair removal and the treatment of vascular or pigmented lesions)

Reduce potential side effects of light or laser treatments (such as for hair removal and the treatment of vascular or pigmented lesions)

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K081578: Accela System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K081578

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026