510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Spy Analysis Toolkit, Model SA9000

K081792510(k) TraditionalCleared Sep 17, 200884-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.2050

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Novadaq Technologies, Inc. · LLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological

Cleared on Sep 17, 2008 as substantially equivalent to K080290 (American Radiologist Network, Inc., 2008) and 2 other predicates after an 84-day review. Its family tree reaches back 8 generations to 1995.

Decided
Sep 17, 2008
Review
84 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LLZ
Recalls
None
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 8 generations to K945512 (1995). 41 ancestors in all, the oldest K871859 (1987). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 2008: 1 other ancestor2006: 1 other ancestor2004: 2 other ancestors2003: 2 other ancestors2002: 1 other ancestor2001: 7 other ancestors1999: 1 other ancestor1996: 4 other ancestors1998: 2 other ancestors1995: 3 other ancestors1994: 3 other ancestors1997: 2 other ancestors2000: 1 other ancestor1993: 2 other ancestors1987: 1 other ancestorK945512 · HRSW Option for CT Twin Flash · Elscint, Inc. · 1995K970980 · Cardiac Scoring for CT Scanners · Elscint, Inc. · 1997K982004 · CT Coronary Artery Calcification Scoring (Cacs) Option for Advantage Windows · General Electric Co. · 1998K020929 · Smartscore 3.5; Smartscore 4.0; Smartscore 4.5 · GE Medical Systems · 2002K022919 · Smart Breath Respiratory Compensation Option · GE Medical Systems · 2002K032915 · Advantage 4D Option · Ge Medical Systems, LLC · 2003K052345 · Advantage Sim MD · GE Healthcare · 2005 · recalledK061671 · Syngo Trued, Model VC10A · Siemens Medical Solutions · 2006198519901995200020052010
  1. Root · 8 generations backK945512 HRSW Option for CT Twin FlashElscint, Inc. · 1995
  2. 7 generations backK970980 Cardiac Scoring for CT ScannersElscint, Inc. · 1997
  3. 6 generations backK982004 CT Coronary Artery Calcification Scoring (Cacs) Option for Advantage…General Electric Co. · 1998
  4. 5 generations backK020929 Smartscore 3.5; Smartscore 4.0; Smartscore 4.5GE Medical Systems · 2002
  5. 4 generations backK022919 Smart Breath Respiratory Compensation OptionGE Medical Systems · 2002
  6. 3 generations backK032915 Advantage 4D OptionGe Medical Systems, LLC · 2003
  7. 2 generations backK052345 Advantage Sim MDGE Healthcare · 2005 · Recalled
  8. 1 generation backK061671 Syngo Trued, Model VC10ASiemens Medical Solutions · 2006
  9. This deviceK081792 Spy Analysis Toolkit, Model SA9000Novadaq Technologies, Inc. · 2008
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−8K945512HRSW Option for CT Twin FlashElscint, Inc.1995—
−7K970980Cardiac Scoring for CT ScannersElscint, Inc.1997—
−6K982004CT Coronary Artery Calcification Scoring (Cacs) Option for Advantage WindowsGeneral Electric Co.1998—
−5K020929Smartscore 3.5; Smartscore 4.0; Smartscore 4.5GE Medical Systems2002—
−4K022919Smart Breath Respiratory Compensation OptionGE Medical Systems2002—
−3K032915Advantage 4D OptionGe Medical Systems, LLC2003—
−2K052345Advantage Sim MDGE Healthcare20053
−1K061671Syngo Trued, Model VC10ASiemens Medical Solutions2006—
0 (this device)K081792Spy Analysis Toolkit, Model SA9000Novadaq Technologies, Inc.2008—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198710
199320
199430
199530
199640
199720
199820
199910
200010
200170
200210
200320
200420
200610
200810
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K081792, 1995–2008Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LLZ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LLZ device

  1. #1 K230955 syngo Application Softwarescore 21.5 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K080290Xviewnet
Summary page 1
…nformation for three of these demonstrates substantial equivalence. These commercial products include: 1. American Radiologist Network xViewNet cleared for market via K080290 Trade Name: xViewNet Product Code: LLZ 2. Siemens syngo TrueD, Model VC1OA cleared for market via K061671 Tr…
American Radiologist Network, Inc.2008—
*K061671Syngo Trued, Model VC10A
Summary page 1
…iologist Network xViewNet cleared for market via K080290 Trade Name: xViewNet Product Code: LLZ 2. Siemens syngo TrueD, Model VC1OA cleared for market via K061671 Trade Name: Siements syngo TrueD, Model VC1OA Product Code: LLZ 3. Biotronics3D 3Dnet Suite cleared for market via…
Siemens Medical Solutions2006—
*K0631073DNET Suite
Summary page 1
…el VC1OA cleared for market via K061671 Trade Name: Siements syngo TrueD, Model VC1OA Product Code: LLZ 3. Biotronics3D 3Dnet Suite cleared for market via K063107 Trade Name: Biotronics3D 3Dnet Suite Product Code: LLZ In each of these software devices, including the SPY Analysis…
Biotronics3D, Ltd.2006—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 13 years and passes through 7 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.9 years on median.
  • 13 of the 41 ancestors have a recall of any class.

How does its category compare?

All LLZ devices

LLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2008, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · LLZ

58in 2025

2007: 762008: 942009: 702010: 512011: 1062012: 822013: 952014: 782015: 642016: 822017: 782018: 1042019: 742020: 812021: 832022: 652023: 872024: 622025: 582026 (partial year): 45
2007high 106 (2011) · low 51 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LLZ

173in 2025

2007: 36 days median2008: 52 days median2009: 62 days median2010: 98 days median2011: 79 days median2012: 87 days median2013: 84 days median2014: 89 days median2015: 90 days median2016: 90 days median2017: 107 days median2018: 105 days median2019: 107 days median2020: 115 days median2021: 116 days median2022: 137 days median2023: 157 days median2024: 131 days median2025: 173 days median2026 (partial year): 110 days median
2007high 173 (2025) · low 36 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LLZ

11in 2025

2007: 202008: 322009: 212010: 172011: 302012: 122013: 642014: 62015: 162016: 122017: 52018: 72019: 22020: 62021: 32022: 42023: 82024: 62025: 112026 (partial year): 14
2007high 64 (2013) · low 2 (2019)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LLZ

116in 2025

2007: 1522008: 1542009: 1452010: 1452011: 4542012: 2662013: 1,1302014: 15,6312015: 2112016: 2902017: 1042018: 722019: 882020: 822021: 702022: 282023: 262024: 422025: 116
2007high 15,631 (2014) · low 26 (2023)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LLZ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007763620152
2008945232154
2009706221145
2010519817145
20111067930454
2012828712266
20139584641,130
20147889615,631
2015649016211
2016829012290
2017781075104
2018104105772
201974107288
202081115682
202183116370
202265137428
202387157826
202462131642
20255817311116
20264511014—

What is it indicated for?

The SPY Analysis Toolkit is a separate companion software application to the SPY Intra-operative Imaging System and is intended as a display, analysis, and comparison tool for the interpretation of SPY images by trained healthcare professionals including cardiovascular, plastic & reconstructive, and organ transplant surgeons.

Note: The clinician retains the ultimate responsibility for making the pertinent diagnosis based on their standard practices and visual comparison of the separate images. The SPY Analysis Toolkit is a complement to the SPY procedures.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K081792: Spy Analysis Toolkit, Model SA9000.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K081792

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026