510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

UF-870 AG Diagnostic Ultrasound System

K081919510(k) SpecialCleared Sep 9, 200864-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1570

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Fukuda Denshi Co., Ltd. · ITX Transducer, Ultrasonic, Diagnostic

Cleared on Sep 9, 2008 as substantially equivalent to K050099 (Kontron Medical Systems Sas, 2005) and 2 other predicates after a 64-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 2000. 2 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Sep 9, 2008
Review
64 days
Class
Class II
Product code
ITX
Recalls
None
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K002239 (2000). 4 ancestors in all. 2 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2006: 1 other ancestor2005: 1 other ancestor2011: 1 descendant cleared2014: 1 descendant clearedK002239 · Sigma 110/330 Diagnostic Ultrasound System · Kontron Medical Systems Sas · 2000K050099 · Sigma 5000 Series Imagic Ultrasound System · Kontron Medical Systems Sas · 2005200020052010201520202025
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 2 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 2 descendants K050099 · Sigma 5000 Series Imagic Ultrasound System · Kontron Medical Systems Sas · 2005K002239 · Sigma 110/330 Diagnostic Ultrasound System · Kontron Medical Systems Sas · 20000
  1. Root · 2 generations backK002239 Sigma 110/330 Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemKontron Medical Systems Sas · 2000
  2. 1 generation backK050099 Sigma 5000 Series Imagic Ultrasound SystemKontron Medical Systems Sas · 2005
  3. This deviceK081919 UF-870 AG Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemFukuda Denshi Co., Ltd. · 2008
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK110920 UF-760AGFukuda Denshi Co., Ltd. · 2011
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK131973 Unexef-38G Ultrasound SystemToyota Tsusho Corporation · 2014

Most influential descendants

Showing 2 of 2 · See all
  • K110920UF-760AGFukuda Denshi Co., Ltd. · 2011 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K131973Unexef-38G Ultrasound SystemToyota Tsusho Corporation · 2014 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K002239Sigma 110/330 Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemKontron Medical Systems Sas2000—
−1K050099Sigma 5000 Series Imagic Ultrasound SystemKontron Medical Systems Sas2005—
0 (this device)K081919UF-870 AG Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemFukuda Denshi Co., Ltd.2008—
+1K110920UF-760AGFukuda Denshi Co., Ltd.2011—
+1K131973Unexef-38G Ultrasound SystemToyota Tsusho Corporation2014—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200510
200610

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201110
201410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K081919, 2000–2014Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in ITX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new ITX device

  1. #1 K260114 Align® Cover and Pad Guidance Toolscore 13.6 · 6 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K050099Sigma 5000 Series Imagic Ultrasound System
Summary page 1
…R 892.1560 90-IYO Diagnostic Ultrasonic Transducer 21 CFR 892.1570 90-ITX 3. Equivalent Legally-Marketed Devices: Kontron Medical Sigma 5000 Series Imagic, K050099, K053084, K06 1437 The technological characteristics of the predicate device are the same as those of the new device. 4. Desc…
Kontron Medical Systems Sas2005—
*K053084Sigma 5000 Series Imagic Ultrasound System
Summary page 1
…0 90-IYO Diagnostic Ultrasonic Transducer 21 CFR 892.1570 90-ITX 3. Equivalent Legally-Marketed Devices: Kontron Medical Sigma 5000 Series Imagic, K050099, K053084, K06 1437 The technological characteristics of the predicate device are the same as those of the new device. 4. Description…
Kontron Medical Systems Sas2005—
*K061437Sigma 5000 Series, Imagic
Summary page 1
…-IYO Diagnostic Ultrasonic Transducer 21 CFR 892.1570 90-ITX 3. Equivalent Legally-Marketed Devices: Kontron Medical Sigma 5000 Series Imagic, K050099, K053084, K06 1437 The technological characteristics of the predicate device are the same as those of the new device. 4. Description The UF-…
Kontron Medical Systems Sas2006—

What descends from it? (2)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K110920UF-760AGFukuda Denshi Co., Ltd.20111
K131973Unexef-38G Ultrasound SystemToyota Tsusho Corporation20140

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 8 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 4.5 years on median.
  • None of the 4 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K110920 (Fukuda Denshi Co., Ltd., 2011) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.

How does its category compare?

All ITX devices

ITX Transducer, Ultrasonic, Diagnostic: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2008, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · ITX

4in 2025

2007: 102008: 122009: 172010: 102011: 102012: 72013: 32014: 42015: 12016: 42017: 62018: 22019: 12020: 32021: 32022: 22023: 62024: 32025: 42026 (partial year): 6
2007high 17 (2009) · low 1 (2015)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · ITX

126in 2025

2007: 26 days median2008: 73 days median2009: 28 days median2010: 42 days median2011: 16 days median2012: 25 days median2013: 105 days median2014: 41 days median2016: 151 days median2017: 110 days median2020: 120 days median2021: 139 days median2023: 213 days median2024: 81 days median2025: 126 days median2026 (partial year): 158 days median
2007high 213 (2023) · low 16 (2011)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · ITX

2in 2025

2008: 42009: 42010: 42011: 12012: 12014: 12015: 52017: 12018: 152020: 32021: 10, 10 Class I2022: 62023: 12024: 12025: 2
2007high 15 (2018) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (10 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · ITX

571in 2025

2007: 162008: 392009: 232010: 302011: 342012: 292013: 382014: 432015: 1832016: 2692017: 4122018: 1302019: 1192020: 1162021: 1462022: 872023: 1382024: 9882025: 571
2007high 988 (2024) · low 16 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code ITX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071026016
20081273439
20091728423
20101042430
20111016134
2012725129
20133105038
2014441143
20151—5183
201641510269
201761101412
20182—15130
20191—0119
202031203116
2021313910 (10)146
20222—687
202362131138
20243811988
202541262571
202661580—

What is it indicated for?

Diagnostic ultrasound imaging or fluid flow analysis of the human body as follows:

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K081919: UF-870 AG Diagnostic Ultrasound System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K081919

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026