510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Modification to Ultralight II ND: Yag Laser System

K082407510(k) SpecialCleared Feb 3, 2009166-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.4810

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Sandstone Medical Technologies, LLC · GEX Powered Laser Surgical Instrument

Cleared on Feb 3, 2009 as substantially equivalent to K041011 (Sandstone Medical Technologies, LLC, 2004) after a 166-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 1995. 3 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Feb 3, 2009
Review
166 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GEX
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K950019 (1995). 8 ancestors in all, the oldest K942622 (1995). 3 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2001: 2 other ancestors1997: 1 other ancestor1995: 1 other ancestor2011: 1 descendant cleared2013: 1 descendant cleared2024: 1 descendant clearedK950019 · Thermolase LT-100 ND:Yag Laser Hair Removal System; Thermolase LT-100;LT-100 · Thermolase Corp. · 1995K973719 · Medlite Q-Switched ND:Yag Laser, Medlite IV Q-Switched ND:Yag Laser · Continuum Biomedical, Inc. · 1997K983054 · Medlite Q-Switched ND:Yag Laser, Medlite IV Q-Switched ND: Yag Laser · Continuum Biomedical, Inc. · 1999K041011 · Ultralight II ND:Yag Laser System · Sandstone Medical Technologies, LLC · 20041995200020052010201520202025
  1. Root · 4 generations backK950019 Thermolase LT-100 ND:Yag Laser Hair Removal System; Thermolase…Thermolase Corp. · 1995
  2. 3 generations backK973719 Medlite Q-Switched ND:Yag Laser, Medlite IV Q-Switched ND:Yag LaserContinuum Biomedical, Inc. · 1997
  3. 2 generations backK983054 Medlite Q-Switched ND:Yag Laser, Medlite IV Q-Switched ND: Yag LaserContinuum Biomedical, Inc. · 1999
  4. 1 generation backK041011 Ultralight II ND:Yag Laser SystemSandstone Medical Technologies, LLC · 2004
  5. This deviceK082407 Modification to Ultralight II ND: Yag Laser SystemSandstone Medical Technologies, LLC · 2009
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 2 of its ownK110502 Triplex ER. Yag / ND: Yag SystemSandstone Medical Technologies, LLC · 2011
  7. Descendant · 2 generations on · 1 of its ownK123777 Multilaser SystemUltralight Laser Technologies, LLC · 2013
  8. Descendant · 3 generations on · 0 of its ownK233143 PiXel8-RevealRohrer Aesthetics · 2024

Most influential descendants

Showing 3 of 3 · See all
  • K110502Triplex ER. Yag / ND: Yag SystemSandstone Medical Technologies, LLC · 2011 · cites it directly2descendants
  • K123777Multilaser SystemUltralight Laser Technologies, LLC · 2013 · 2 generations on1descendant
  • K233143PiXel8-RevealRohrer Aesthetics · 2024 · 3 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−4K950019Thermolase LT-100 ND:Yag Laser Hair Removal System; Thermolase LT-100;LT-100Thermolase Corp.1995—
−3K973719Medlite Q-Switched ND:Yag Laser, Medlite IV Q-Switched ND:Yag LaserContinuum Biomedical, Inc.1997—
−2K983054Medlite Q-Switched ND:Yag Laser, Medlite IV Q-Switched ND: Yag LaserContinuum Biomedical, Inc.1999—
−1K041011Ultralight II ND:Yag Laser SystemSandstone Medical Technologies, LLC2004—
0 (this device)K082407Modification to Ultralight II ND: Yag Laser SystemSandstone Medical Technologies, LLC2009—
+1K110502Triplex ER. Yag / ND: Yag SystemSandstone Medical Technologies, LLC2011—
+2K123777Multilaser SystemUltralight Laser Technologies, LLC2013—
+3K233143PiXel8-RevealRohrer Aesthetics2024—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199510
199710
200120

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201110
201310
202410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K082407, 1995–2024Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GEX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new GEX device

  1. #1 K222064 The Alma Soprano Titaniumscore 38.1 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K041011Ultralight II ND:Yag Laser System
Summary page 1
…79-GEX, 21 CFR 878-48 Legally Marketed Predicate Device: UltraLight II Nd:YAG Laser System K041011 Description of the UltraLight H Nd:YAG The UltraLight II Nd:YAG Laser System consists of a power Laser System:…
Sandstone Medical Technologies, LLC2004—

Also cleared against K041011: 1 other device →

What descends from it? (3)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K110502Triplex ER. Yag / ND: Yag SystemSandstone Medical Technologies, LLC20112

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 14 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 4.1 years on median.
  • None of the 8 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K110502 (Sandstone Medical Technologies, LLC, 2011) has gone furthest, with 2 descendants of its own.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K041011.

How does its category compare?

All GEX devices

GEX Powered Laser Surgical Instrument: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2009, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · GEX

83in 2025

2007: 732008: 1072009: 692010: 502011: 412012: 452013: 462014: 612015: 472016: 512017: 672018: 512019: 412020: 522021: 532022: 602023: 522024: 822025: 832026 (partial year): 57
2007high 107 (2008) · low 41 (2011)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GEX

90in 2025

2007: 79 days median2008: 86 days median2009: 100 days median2010: 96 days median2011: 83 days median2012: 118 days median2013: 144 days median2014: 147 days median2015: 112 days median2016: 114 days median2017: 90 days median2018: 78 days median2019: 88 days median2020: 90 days median2021: 123 days median2022: 152 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 90 days median2025: 90 days median2026 (partial year): 90 days median
2007high 152 (2022) · low 78 (2018)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · GEX

3in 2024

2007: 92008: 22010: 42011: 182012: 52013: 32014: 62016: 12017: 5, 1 Class I2018: 52019: 62020: 12023: 62024: 32026 (partial year): 2
2007high 18 (2011) · low 0 (2009)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GEX

2,720in 2025

2007: 3422008: 2322009: 2092010: 1,7112011: 3,0242012: 2,0002013: 2,2362014: 2,0362015: 2,0992016: 2,5852017: 2,9772018: 3,5252019: 2,7092020: 2,1832021: 3,4652022: 2,2882023: 2,3372024: 2,1872025: 2,720
2007high 3,525 (2018) · low 209 (2009)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GEX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200773799342
2008107862232
2009691000209
2010509641,711
20114183183,024
20124511852,000
20134614432,236
20146114762,036
20154711202,099
20165111412,585
201767905 (1)2,977
2018517853,525
2019418862,709
2020529012,183
20215312303,465
20226015202,288
2023528762,337
2024829032,187
2025839002,720
202657902—

What is it indicated for?

At the 1064 unm wavelength - dark ink tattoo removal, removal of pigmented lesions and the removal or lightening of hair.

At the 532 unm wavelength - removal of red ink tattoos, treatment of vascular lesions including facial and leg veins, telangiectasias, angiomas, hemangiomas, port wine stains and most pigmented lesions (e.g. lentigies, ep~hildes)

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K082407: Modification to Ultralight II ND: Yag Laser System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K082407

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026