510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2012

Stingray Electrosurgical Forceps

K083162510(k) TraditionalCleared Jan 12, 200977-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.4400Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Stingray Surgical Products, Inc. · GEI Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories

Cleared on Jan 12, 2009 as substantially equivalent to K070997 (Pro-Med Instruments GmbH, 2007) after a 77-day review. Its family tree reaches back 5 generations to 1992. 13 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Jan 12, 2009
Review
77 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GEI
Recalls
1
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 5 generations to K923332 (1992). 7 ancestors in all. 13 later devices descend from it, 3 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 1998: 1 other ancestor1997: 1 other ancestor2010: 1 descendant cleared2011: 2 descendants cleared2013: 2 descendants cleared2015: 1 descendant cleared2012: 1 descendant cleared2022: 1 descendant cleared2016: 2 descendants cleared2014: 1 descendant cleared2020: 1 descendant cleared2017: 1 descendant clearedK923332 · Electrosurgical Electrodes · Premier Dental Products Co. · 1992K970987 · Electrosurgical Electrode · Fusion Medical Technologies, Inc. · 1997K992931 · Non-Stick Bipolar Forceps · Silverglide Surgical Technologies · 1999K051429 · Claris Non-Stick Bipolar Forceps · Guenter Bissinger Medizintechnik GmbH · 2005K070997 · Doro Non-Stick Bipolar Forceps, Model 5001-XX to 5012-XX, Doro Bipolar Reusable Cables, Model 5015-XX · Pro-Med Instruments GmbH · 20071990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 3 generations back: 1 other ancestor4 generations back: 1 other ancestor 1 generation forward: 3 descendants2 generations forward: 3 descendants3 generations forward: 3 descendants4 generations forward: 2 descendants5 generations forward: 2 descendants K070997 · Doro Non-Stick Bipolar Forceps, Model 5001-XX to 5012-XX, Doro Bipolar Reusable Cables, Model 5015-XX · Pro-Med Instruments GmbH · 2007K051429 · Claris Non-Stick Bipolar Forceps · Guenter Bissinger Medizintechnik GmbH · 2005K992931 · Non-Stick Bipolar Forceps · Silverglide Surgical Technologies · 1999K970987 · Electrosurgical Electrode · Fusion Medical Technologies, Inc. · 1997K923332 · Electrosurgical Electrodes · Premier Dental Products Co. · 1992−50+5
  1. Root · 5 generations backK923332 Electrosurgical ElectrodesPremier Dental Products Co. · 1992
  2. 4 generations backK970987 Electrosurgical ElectrodeFusion Medical Technologies, Inc. · 1997
  3. 3 generations backK992931 Non-Stick Bipolar ForcepsSilverglide Surgical Technologies · 1999
  4. 2 generations backK051429 Claris Non-Stick Bipolar ForcepsGuenter Bissinger Medizintechnik GmbH · 2005
  5. 1 generation backK070997 Doro Non-Stick Bipolar Forceps, Model 5001-XX to 5012-XX, Doro…Pro-Med Instruments GmbH · 2007
  6. This deviceK083162 Stingray Electrosurgical ForcepsStingray Surgical Products, Inc. · 2009
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 10 of its ownK093108 Stryker Bipolar ForcepsStryker Leibinger GmbH & Co KG · 2010
  8. Descendant · 2 generations on · 3 of its ownK152219 PK AIMGyrus Acmi, Inc. · 2015
  9. Descendant · 2 generations on · 3 of its ownK110143 Het Bipolar Electrocautery ForcepsHet Systems, LLC · 2011
  10. Descendant · 3 generations on · 2 of its ownK161825 PK AIMGyrus Acmi, Inc. · 2016
  11. Descendant · 3 generations on · 2 of its ownK121085 Het Bipolar Ligator SystemHet Systems, LLC · 2012

Showing 5 of 13 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2010: 12011: 22012: 12013: 22014: 12015: 12016: 22017: 12020: 12022: 1
2010high 2 (2011) · low 0 (2018)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 13 · See all
  • K093108Stryker Bipolar ForcepsStryker Leibinger GmbH & Co KG · 2010 · cites it directly10descendants
  • K152219PK AIMGyrus Acmi, Inc. · 2015 · 2 generations on3descendants
  • K110143Het Bipolar Electrocautery ForcepsHet Systems, LLC · 2011 · 2 generations on3descendants
  • K161825PK AIMGyrus Acmi, Inc. · 2016 · 3 generations on2descendants
  • K121085Het Bipolar Ligator SystemHet Systems, LLC · 2012 · 3 generations on2descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−5K923332Electrosurgical ElectrodesPremier Dental Products Co.1992—
−4K970987Electrosurgical ElectrodeFusion Medical Technologies, Inc.1997—
−3K992931Non-Stick Bipolar ForcepsSilverglide Surgical Technologies1999—
−2K051429Claris Non-Stick Bipolar ForcepsGuenter Bissinger Medizintechnik GmbH2005—
−1K070997Doro Non-Stick Bipolar Forceps, Model 5001-XX to 5012-XX, Doro Bipolar…Pro-Med Instruments GmbH2007—
0 (this device)K083162Stingray Electrosurgical ForcepsStingray Surgical Products, Inc.2009—
+1K093108Stryker Bipolar ForcepsStryker Leibinger GmbH & Co KG2010—
+2K152219PK AIMGyrus Acmi, Inc.2015—
+2K110143Het Bipolar Electrocautery ForcepsHet Systems, LLC2011—
+3K161825PK AIMGyrus Acmi, Inc.2016—
+3K121085Het Bipolar Ligator SystemHet Systems, LLC2012—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199710
199810

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201010
201120
201210
201320
201410
201510
201620
201710
202010
202210
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K083162, 1992–2022Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GEI? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new GEI device

  1. #1 K231790 The InMode System with the Morpheus8 Applicatorsscore 32.7 · 21 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K070997Doro Non-Stick Bipolar Forceps, Model 5001-XX to 5012-XX, Doro Bipolar Reusable Cables…
Summary page 1
…sories Product Codes Product Code GEI Common/Usual Name: Bipolar Forceps . Equivalent legally marketed devices: ProMed Instruments GmbH DORO® Non-Stick Bipolar Forceps K070997 . Indications for Use (intended use) Designed to grasp, manipulate and coagulate selected tissue for use in general surgical pro…
Pro-Med Instruments GmbH2007—

What descends from it? (13)

See all 13

3 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K093108Stryker Bipolar ForcepsStryker Leibinger GmbH & Co KG201010
K123478Stingray Bipolar ForcepsStingray Surgical Products20130
K102752Stingray Ultralite Disposable Irrigating Bipolar ForcepsStingray Surgical Products, Inc.20110

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
May 23, 2012Class IIZ-2011-2012PackagingOn 05/23/2012, Stingray Surgical Products, LLC., Boca Raton, FL initiated a recall initiated due to "Instructions For Use" of Bipolar Forceps not being cleared by FDA and incorrect "Instructions For Use" . The sterilization instructions…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 17 years and passes through 6 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.5 years on median.
  • 1 of the 7 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K093108 (Stryker Leibinger GmbH & Co KG, 2010) has gone furthest, with 10 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All GEI devices

GEI Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2009, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · GEI

52in 2025

2007: 502008: 612009: 422010: 462011: 352012: 392013: 482014: 492015: 472016: 642017: 522018: 472019: 482020: 592021: 462022: 552023: 652024: 592025: 522026 (partial year): 43
2007high 65 (2023) · low 35 (2011)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GEI

113in 2025

2007: 51 days median2008: 71 days median2009: 130 days median2010: 109 days median2011: 135 days median2012: 133 days median2013: 136 days median2014: 103 days median2015: 123 days median2016: 108 days median2017: 72 days median2018: 93 days median2019: 93 days median2020: 105 days median2021: 146 days median2022: 150 days median2023: 104 days median2024: 125 days median2025: 113 days median2026 (partial year): 183 days median
2007high 183 (2026) · low 51 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · GEI

4in 2025

2007: 212008: 192009: 272010: 512011: 322012: 302013: 132014: 32015: 42016: 32017: 22018: 62019: 52020: 12021: 62022: 492023: 27, 4 Class I2024: 22, 10 Class I2025: 42026 (partial year): 8
2007high 51 (2010) · low 1 (2020)2026

Class I (14 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GEI

7,592in 2025

2007: 2,7952008: 2,5562009: 3,5912010: 3,3772011: 4,4632012: 5,2162013: 4,8972014: 4,9082015: 4,9362016: 5,6162017: 6,0732018: 6,5452019: 7,0672020: 6,4902021: 6,3542022: 6,1032023: 7,1762024: 7,8972025: 7,592
2007high 7,897 (2024) · low 2,556 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GEI, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20075051212,795
20086171192,556
200942130273,591
201046109513,377
201135135324,463
201239133305,216
201348136134,897
20144910334,908
20154712344,936
20166410835,616
2017527226,073
2018479366,545
2019489357,067
20205910516,490
20214614666,354
202255150496,103
20236510427 (4)7,176
20245912522 (10)7,897
20255211347,592
2026431838—

What is it indicated for?

Designed to grasp, manipulate and coagulate selected tissue for use in general surgical procedures They are connected through a suitable bipolar cable with the bipolar output of an electrosurgical generator. Bipolar forceps must only be used with bipolar coagulation current. Coagulation is achieved using electrosurgical energy generated by the electro surgical generator unit and activated by a footswitch. The Stingray Forceps have not been shown to be effective for tubal sterilization or tubal coagulation for sterilization procedures and should not be used for these procedures.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K083162: Stingray Electrosurgical Forceps.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K083162

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026