510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2021

Powerport Duo M.R.I. Implanted Port with 9.5 FR. Dual Lumen Chronoflex Polyurethane Catheter

K090512510(k) SpecialCleared Mar 27, 200929-day reviewClass II21 CFR 880.5965Recalls 3

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

C.R. Bard, Inc. · LJT Port & Catheter, Implanted, Subcutaneous, Intravascular

Cleared on Mar 27, 2009 after a 29-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 3 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 3 times.

Decided
Mar 27, 2009
Review
29 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LJT
Recalls
3
Predicates
0

3 later devices descend from it, 3 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2019: 1 descendant cleared2016: 1 descendant cleared2025: 1 descendant cleared20052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK090512 Powerport Duo M.R.I. Implanted Port with 9.5 FR. Dual Lumen…C.R. Bard, Inc. · 2009
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK252478 Vaccess™ CT Low-Profile Power-Injectable Implantable Port; Vaccess™…Bard Access Systems, Inc. · 2025
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK181446 Bard Power-Injectable Implantable Ports (PowerPorts®)C.R. Bard, Inc. · 2019
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK153238 Dignity Dual PortMedcomp ( Medical Components) · 2016

Most influential descendants

Showing 3 of 3 · See all
  • K252478Vaccess™ CT Low-Profile Power-Injectable Implantable Port; Vaccess™ CT Power-Injectable…Bard Access Systems, Inc. · 2025 · cites it directly0descendants
  • K181446Bard Power-Injectable Implantable Ports (PowerPorts®)C.R. Bard, Inc. · 2019 · cites it directly0descendants
  • K153238Dignity Dual PortMedcomp ( Medical Components) · 2016 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K090512Powerport Duo M.R.I. Implanted Port with 9.5 FR. Dual Lumen Chronoflex…C.R. Bard, Inc.2009—
+1K252478Vaccess™ CT Low-Profile Power-Injectable Implantable Port; Vaccess™ CT…Bard Access Systems, Inc.2025—
+1K181446Bard Power-Injectable Implantable Ports (PowerPorts®)C.R. Bard, Inc.2019—
+1K153238Dignity Dual PortMedcomp ( Medical Components)2016—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201610
201910
202510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K090512, 2009–2025Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LJT? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LJT device

  1. #1 K251253 PowerPort™ isp Implantable Port; PowerPort™…score 14.9 · 9 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—PowerPort M.R.I. Implanted Port with 8.0 Fr. ChronoFlex Polyurethane Catheter
Named without a submission number
—
*—X-Port duo Implanted Port with 9.5 Fr. Dual Lumen (D/L) ChronoFlex Polyurethane Catheter
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (3)

3 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K252478Vaccess™ CT Low-Profile Power-Injectable Implantable Port; Vaccess™ CT Power-Injectable…Bard Access Systems, Inc.20250
K181446Bard Power-Injectable Implantable Ports (PowerPorts®)C.R. Bard, Inc.20190
K153238Dignity Dual PortMedcomp ( Medical Components)20160

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Mar 25, 2021Class IIZ-1550-2021Process controlCatheters may experience difficulty in flushing, infusion, and/or aspiration, and septum dislodgements.
Mar 25, 2021Class IIZ-1551-2021Process controlCatheters may experience difficulty in flushing, infusion, and/or aspiration, and septum dislodgements.
Mar 25, 2021Class IIZ-1552-2021Process controlCatheters may experience difficulty in flushing, infusion, and/or aspiration, and septum dislodgements.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K252478 (Bard Access Systems, Inc., 2025) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All LJT devices

LJT Port & Catheter, Implanted, Subcutaneous, Intravascular: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2009, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · LJT

2in 2025

2007: 112008: 72009: 22010: 22011: 52012: 22013: 72014: 22015: 42016: 32019: 12020: 12023: 12024: 12025: 22026 (partial year): 1
2007high 11 (2007) · low 0 (2017)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LJT

182in 2016

2007: 85 days median2008: 119 days median2011: 144 days median2013: 150 days median2015: 164 days median2016: 182 days median
2007high 182 (2016) · low 85 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LJT

1in 2022

2007: 12008: 22009: 22010: 192011: 12012: 22015: 12017: 12018: 12019: 72022: 12026 (partial year): 1, 1 Class I
2007high 19 (2010) · low 0 (2013)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LJT

4,308in 2025

2007: 2082008: 1612009: 1722010: 2072011: 2022012: 1532013: 1412014: 1432015: 1492016: 1352017: 2622018: 8782019: 7652020: 9592021: 1,2852022: 1,3342023: 1,2212024: 1,8962025: 4,308
2007high 4,308 (2025) · low 135 (2016)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LJT, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200711851208
200871192161
20092—2172
20102—19207
201151441202
20122—2153
201371500141
20142—0143
201541641149
201631820135
20170—1262
20180—1878
20191—7765
20201—0959
20210—01,285
20220—11,334
20231—01,221
20241—01,896
20252—04,308
20261—1 (1)—

What is it indicated for?

The PowerPort' Implanted Port is indicated for patient therapies requiring repeated access to the vascular system. The port system can be used for infusion of medications, I.V. fluids, parenteral nutrition solutions, blood products, and for the withdrawal of blood samples. When used with a PowerLoc' Safety Infusion Set, the PowerPort device is indicated for power injection of contrast media. For power injection of contrast media, the maximum recommended infusion rate is 5 ml/s.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K090512: Powerport Duo M.R.I. Implanted Port with 9.5 FR. Dual Lumen Chronoflex Polyurethane Catheter.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K090512

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026