510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · 2010

Modification to Cyberknife Robotic Radiosurgery System

K091146510(k) SpecialCleared May 1, 200911-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.5050Recalls 3

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Accuray, Inc. · MUJ System, Planning, Radiation Therapy Treatment

Cleared on May 1, 2009 after an 11-day review. The FDA summary names no predicate by number. It has been recalled 3 times.

Decided
May 1, 2009
Review
11 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MUJ
Recalls
3
Predicates
0

The FDA summary names no predicate by number.

FIG. 1 — Lineage of K091146Source: FDA 510(k) database · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MUJ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MUJ device

  1. #1 K232799 syngo.via RT Image Suitescore 18.6 · 19 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

The FDA summary names no predicate by number.

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Jul 6, 2010Not classifiedZ-0890-2011Device DesignLatches responsible for securing the cover to the device may come lose if not properly secured and the cover may unexpectedly drop off. A design change is planned.
Jan 15, 2010Not classifiedZ-1023-2011Software designWhen a user modified the align center of an existing plan during the treatment planning process the effective depths of each beam in the plan were not updated by the system. These depths were incorrect and led to an incorrect dose…
Dec 29, 2009Not classifiedZ-1008-2011Employee errorIf electron density values are left empty, the calculation of radiation dose in a patient will be modeled as air-like density material rather than correct density. A plan may be created and saved, thus creating the risk of mistreatment.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All MUJ devices

MUJ System, Planning, Radiation Therapy Treatment: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2009, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MUJ

10in 2025

2007: 42008: 92009: 162010: 112011: 92012: 82013: 52014: 92015: 132016: 52017: 72018: 72019: 92020: 92021: 112022: 82023: 102024: 92025: 102026 (partial year): 9
2007high 16 (2009) · low 4 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MUJ

186in 2025

2007: 67 days median2008: 63 days median2009: 84 days median2010: 56 days median2011: 103 days median2012: 59 days median2013: 64 days median2014: 108 days median2015: 78 days median2016: 80 days median2017: 30 days median2018: 53 days median2019: 56 days median2020: 104 days median2021: 87 days median2022: 168 days median2023: 140 days median2024: 122 days median2025: 186 days median2026 (partial year): 233 days median
2007high 233 (2026) · low 30 (2017)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MUJ

2in 2023

2007: 42008: 102009: 112010: 232011: 172012: 42013: 62014: 22015: 72016: 132017: 42018: 32019: 42020: 22021: 42022: 32023: 22026 (partial year): 2
2007high 23 (2010) · low 0 (2024)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MUJ

21in 2025

2007: 242008: 512009: 242010: 782011: 732012: 392013: 332014: 352015: 302016: 272017: 162018: 252019: 252020: 262021: 152022: 222023: 762024: 92025: 21
2007high 78 (2010) · low 9 (2024)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MUJ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007467424
20089631051
200916841124
201011562378
201191031773
2012859439
2013564633
20149108235
20151378730
20165801327
2017730416
2018753325
2019956425
20209104226
20211187415
20228168322
202310140276
2024912209
202510186021
202692332—

What is it indicated for?

The CyberKnife® Robotic Radiosurgery System is indicated for treatment

planning and image guided stereotactic radiosurgery and precision radiotherapy

for lesions, tumors and conditions anywhere in the body when radiation treatment

is indicated.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K091146: Modification to Cyberknife Robotic Radiosurgery System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K091146

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026